03-15-2010, 02:35 PM
|
#11
|
Faqda Falcons
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ruston, Louisiana
Posts: 3,465
|
Re: Back-up QB options?
Originally Posted by CantonLegend
sure...we could pick them up, but they are retired
there is a reason i didnt include age.....because age isnt as big a deal as talent or intelligence
if a guy can still play then it doesnt matter how old or young he is
brunell is 39.....brett favre is 40.....kurt warner is 38.....jeff garcia is 40
there are lots of older QBs that played and can play.....we dont need a backup QB that can take over for drew right now because drew is still in his prime.....we need a QB who can fill in short term and win a few games if drew goes down.....thats what brunell is
then on the other hand.....we have chase daniel who is young enough to learn and be groomed for the long term replacement if drew retires or goes down for an extended period of time
we dont need a backup at the same age as drew because they will be asking for starting money as a backup
You really didn't just put Brunell in the same category as Warner, Favre, and Garcia, did you? The only thing similar about them IS the age. Brunell hasn't played a full season as a starter in what? 4 years? Those other guys are and were still playing at high levels for their age. The same cannot be said for Brunell. Do you honestly think the Saints could win a few games with him behind center if something happens to Brees? If you do, you are probably one of the few. I'll admit that I liked the signing of Brunell two years ago, but since I've seen him on the field, not so much anymore. Brunell looked God awful in that game against Carolina. It was painful to watch. Just because he has a decent resume, doesn't mean he is not replaceable. I will agree with you that Brunell is intelligent, but talent has left him long ago. I would much rather see what Chase Daniel can bring to the table over Brunell.
|
|
|
|