Go Back   New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints

Mark Ingram musing

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; I don't think we should do ONE THING to change our offense. NOT ONE THING. I would like to see more of Joe Morgan, though. If we lose a receiver. Alaska...

Like Tree15Likes

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-23-2012, 09:14 PM   #1
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Anchorage, AK
Posts: 2,484
Blog Entries: 2
I don't think we should do ONE THING to change our offense. NOT ONE THING.

I would like to see more of Joe Morgan, though. If we lose a receiver.

Alaska
AlaskaSaints is offline  
Old 02-23-2012, 09:42 PM   #2
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,469
Personally I'm not impressed. While healthy I saw Ingram missing some holes and not showing very good vision for a RB. The easiest position in football by most pundits is the RB spot, and Ingram to me left a lot to be desired. I don't think we needed him, I think it was a luxury pick and it's gonna come back to haunt us in this up coming draft.
Marlboro Man is offline  
Old 02-23-2012, 10:00 PM   #3
Truth Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,758
Originally Posted by Marlboro Man View Post
Personally I'm not impressed. While healthy I saw Ingram missing some holes and not showing very good vision for a RB. The easiest position in football by most pundits is the RB spot, and Ingram to me left a lot to be desired. I don't think we needed him, I think it was a luxury pick and it's gonna come back to haunt us in this up coming draft.
We didn't have a healthy RB on the roster. It wasn't a luxury pick at all.
Danno is offline  
Old 02-23-2012, 11:11 PM   #4
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 9,126
Originally Posted by Danno View Post
We didn't have a healthy RB on the roster. It wasn't a luxury pick at all.
True, but there were solid RB's in the late rounds. Look at Stevan Ridley. I do think it was a good move though, Ingram likely dropped about 5 spots from where he would have been in most drafts. I believe Payton went and did it thinking this year's 1st he would likely get a RB anyway so why not.
Beastmode is offline  
Old 02-24-2012, 01:14 AM   #5
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 2,729
Overall, the only thing I was disappointed with Ingram was the injuries, but in the NFL those things do happen. For the most part, he did his job. One thing to remember is he did not have an ideal situation to work with. Playing on a team that is pass first, and uses 3 running backs in a rotation, pretty difficult to get a grove on.
MatthewT is offline  
Old 02-24-2012, 02:26 AM   #6
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Anchorage, AK
Posts: 2,484
Blog Entries: 2
God forbid he'd have been the only back to groove on...

But I'm with you, Matt. In a way. Because I'm hoping for more than the best.

Alaska
AlaskaSaints is offline  
Old 02-24-2012, 10:43 AM   #7
Pink Nightmare
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 3,028
Blog Entries: 7
Here are some Rookie stats:

I will leave AP out of this, because he's a freak.

MJD: 941 yards, 5.7 average, 13 TD's (More than AP)

McFadden: 499 yrds, 4.4 avg, 4 TD's

PT (Rookie): 252 yrds, 4.8 avg, 5 TD's

PT (2011): 562 yrds, 5.1 avg, 5 TD's

MI: 474 yrds, 3.9 avg, 5 TD's

Is what we expect from rookies too much? If we take what rookies do their first season, PT would be gone. I think stats can be misleading sometimes. Lets look at Darren Sproles' numbers...

DS (career): Rushing: 1,757 yrds (603 with Saints), 5.2 avg, 8 TD's

Recieving: 2,110 (710 with Saints), 9.1 avg, 18 TD's

Now those are not really impressive numbers. But who wants Darren off this team?

The Saints are not a rushing juggernaut team. We have 4 RB's that are great. That is a very good problem to have. None of our RB's are gonna have 1,000 yrd years. Our offense isn't set up to do that. I was very happy with Mark this year. Hate he had the toe injury. I really think he would have finished with 600 yrds this year. I understand your disappointment, but again, don't we expect too much from our rookies?

I would compare College guys going into the NFL; like expecting a person who has been driving a car for 20 years to getting in a NASCAR racecar and saying, "Win or else".

"We are number one. All others are number two, or lower."
-The Sphinx
http://blackandgold.com/groups/28-ou...tsman-s-corner
SapperSaint is offline  
Old 02-24-2012, 10:49 AM   #8
Truth Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,758
"The only thing keeping Mark Ingram from being Rookie of the Year is me". -Sean Payton
SapperSaint and st thomas like this.
Danno is offline  
Old 02-24-2012, 10:56 AM   #9
Pink Nightmare
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 3,028
Blog Entries: 7
Originally Posted by Danno View Post
"The only thing keeping Mark Ingram from being Rookie of the Year is me". -Sean Payton
and Chuck Norris
SapperSaint is offline  
Old 02-24-2012, 12:13 PM   #10
Site Donor 2018
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: lafayette
Posts: 7,753
Originally Posted by Danno View Post
"The only thing keeping Mark Ingram from being Rookie of the Year is me". -Sean Payton
i'm glad u brought that up danno.payton believed, i were not disappointed at all with ingram give him 25 plus carries a game with this (passing offense)and see where this thread goes. its not fair to grade him when he was sharing lots of carries.
SapperSaint likes this.
st thomas is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/41421-mark-ingram-musing.html
Posted By For Type Date Hits
Mark Ingram musing This thread Refback 02-23-2012 01:08 PM 7


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:41 AM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts