04-10-2012, 12:09 PM
|
#14
|
100th Post
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Miami
Posts: 424
|
Originally Posted by Tobias-Reiper
Don't try to rationalize it in any other way than an action taken by a corporation with the intention of using it as evidence in their favor when the ex-player lawsuits go to court. No more, no less.
Sorry to nerd it up, but evidence of mitigation following the act can't be used in favor of or against in a lawsuit. But it WILL poison the jury pool. By the time it goes to trial, years from now, jurors won't remember that all this cracking down happened AFTER the lawsuit was filed.
|
|
|
|