Go Back   New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints

Graham is not better than Gronkowski

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Stats definitely don't tell the whole story, but even if they did, c'mon... Jimmy broke Kellen Winslow's record and then Gronkowski Passed him by about what, 10 yards later that day? The only area where Gronk was fairly significantly ahead ...

Like Tree21Likes

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-25-2012, 05:18 AM   #1
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 3,923
Blog Entries: 3
Stats definitely don't tell the whole story, but even if they did, c'mon... Jimmy broke Kellen Winslow's record and then Gronkowski Passed him by about what, 10 yards later that day? The only area where Gronk was fairly significantly ahead was in TD's. That's only because every time the Patriots got in the red zone, or near it, they were throwing to him. You never had to wonder who the first target was. It was always going to be him, and if someone else ended up with a TD it was only because Gronk was probably triple teamed. The beauty of our offense is we have so many polished weapons, Brees can pick and choose.

But all stats aside, the most dynamic playmaking TE I saw last year was Jimmy Graham. He might not be a polished blocker, but he now has just three combined years of playing football in his entire life. Give him a break, he'll get there. Though I think Gronkowski is a total moron, he's a good player, I'll give him that. But he unquestionably benefits from a TE oriented system, whereas we're more wide open and thus get more out of everyone.

If I had a nickel for every time I heard that, the NFL would fine and suspend me.
burningmetal is offline  
Old 06-25-2012, 05:18 AM   #2
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: West Monroe
Posts: 57

Bout 30 seconds in is just one reason graham is better. That and his 4.5 speed compared to gronks 4.65-4.7
rdanderson91 is offline  
Old 06-25-2012, 05:41 AM   #3
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 3,923
Blog Entries: 3
Originally Posted by rdanderson91 View Post
Jump at the NFL Combine feat. Glee - YouTube

Bout 30 seconds in is just one reason graham is better. That and his 4.5 speed compared to gronks 4.65-4.7
Yeah, Jimmy is freakishly athletic. The only TE perhaps in the history of the league who remotely compares is Vernon Davis. But even he takes a back seat to Graham, in my opinion. Davis is very fast for a TE but he doesn't consistently make plays, and he's been playing the game a lot longer than Jimmy.

I predict a couple years from now this subject will not be worth discussing. Jimmy Graham is going to be light years ahead of everyone else.


Edit: Want to clarify that I think Davis is the only TE who compares athletically, not in overall play. Obviously Gronkowski, Gates (when healthy), Tony Gonzalez in his prime and many others are, or were, better than Davis. Jimmy is in that upper echelon, but Vernon (except against us) just doesn't bring it enough.
Rell&Gold likes this.

If I had a nickel for every time I heard that, the NFL would fine and suspend me.
burningmetal is offline  
Old 06-25-2012, 06:58 AM   #4
failclownHunter
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: N.O. and V.A.
Posts: 2,260
Blog Entries: 3
Graham and Gronk are pretty even.

Gronk is a better runner after the catch, and run blocker. Graham is faster but lacks some running skills. Gronk runs like a power RB,
Kind of a TE/RB hybrid.

Graham is a better pass catcher, and pass blocker. Gronk can't make the one handed grabs or athletic dives Graham does.
A TE/WR hybrid.

depending on what your offense needs take your pick, but they are pretty even to me.

Last edited by pherein; 06-25-2012 at 07:03 AM..
pherein is offline  
Old 06-25-2012, 07:01 AM   #5
Truth Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,756
Originally Posted by pherein View Post
Graham and Gronk are pretty even.

Gronk is a better runner after the catch, and run blocker. Graham is faster but lacks some running skills. Gronk runs like a power RB,
Kind of a TE/RB hybrid.

Graham is a better pass catcher, and pass blocker. Gronk can't make the one handed grabs or athletic dives Graham does.
A TE/WR hybrid.

depending on what your offense needs take your pick, but they are pretty even to me.
Agreed. Jimmy needs some work on breaking tackles. I'm sure he'll improve but if you had to pick a weakness, thats his.
pherein likes this.
Danno is offline  
Old 06-25-2012, 07:27 AM   #6
10000 POST CLUB
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cypress Tx.
Posts: 19,047
Originally Posted by Danno View Post
Agreed. Jimmy needs some work on breaking tackles. I'm sure he'll improve but if you had to pick a weakness, thats his.
That needs to be taught... Not just to Jimmy. Coleston goes down pretty quick also... On the other hand Lance Moore put in 200% after the catch.

Interesting though is that Graham is 17th in the league for YAC.

Sproles is second and Thomas is fifteenth.
2011 NFL Player Receiving Stats - National Football League - ESPN
TheOak is offline  
Old 06-25-2012, 07:13 AM   #7
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 3,923
Blog Entries: 3
Originally Posted by pherein View Post
Graham and Gronk are pretty even.

Gronk is a better runner after the catch, and run blocker. Graham is faster but lacks some running skills. Gronk runs like a power RB,
Kind of a TE/RB hybrid.

Graham is a better pass catcher, and pass blocker. Gronk can't make the one handed grabs or athletic dives Graham does.
A TE/WR hybrid.

depending on what your offense needs take your pick, but they are pretty even to me.
I agree that they are fairly even for now. Don't think it will take long for Graham to surpass him in most every phase. I don't quite agree that Gronk is a better runner after the catch. Remember that play he made against the Texans last year, where he dragged defenders on his back for about 20 yards? Also the long TD against the 49ers in the playoffs, that was an incredible play. Those are the big one's that immediately come to mind, but I've seen him make plenty of nice, if not spectacular runs after the catch. I think YAC yards can be a very misleading stat. A lot of it, not all, but a lot has to do with where you catch the ball. If you're getting it in space, you stand to get a lot of extra yardage. The Patriots being an offense built around their tight ends, seemed to take more shots down field to those guys then the Saints did with Graham.

When we've given Jimmy some space to work with down field he's done his best work, but he's also great on the intermediate stuff. I didn't notice where Gronk was any better at breaking loose, but maybe that's just me. If he does need to improve, I am very confident he will.

If I had a nickel for every time I heard that, the NFL would fine and suspend me.
burningmetal is offline  
Old 06-25-2012, 07:27 AM   #8
failclownHunter
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: N.O. and V.A.
Posts: 2,260
Blog Entries: 3
Originally Posted by burningmetal View Post
I don't quite agree that Gronk is a better runner after the catch. Remember that play he made against the Texans last year, where he dragged defenders on his back for about 20 yards? Also the long TD against the 49ers in the playoffs, that was an incredible play. Those are the big one's that immediately come to mind, but I've seen him make plenty of nice, if not spectacular runs after the catch. I think YAC yards can be a very misleading stat. A lot of it, not all, but a lot has to with where you catch the ball. If you're getting it in space, you stand to get a lot of extra yardage. The Patriots being an offense built around their tight ends, seemed to take more shots down field to those guys then the Saints did with Graham When we've given Jimmy some space to work with down field he's done his best work, but he's also great on the intermediate stuff. I didn't notice where Gronk was any better at breaking loose, but maybe that's just me. If he does need to improve, I am very confident he will.

Yeah, that was a great play , but if you watch Gronk he drags guys down the field every week,makes defenders look silly after the catch.
Graham has been tackled by 1 5'10 CB or safety way more than he gets away.

Graham was targeted 30 more times than Gronk last season. I think the YAC is valid in Gronks case. He is never as open as Graham is. Your right YAC is overrated in a lot of cases, but not is this case I believe.
Graham needs to improve in this area, and even if he never does, I don't think it matters.
In the end what really matters is who can catch better for a TE, and thats clearly Graham. He catches things only Colston could.

Rushing/Receiving TD
1. LeSean McCoy*+ · PHI 20
2. Rob Gronkowski*+ · NWE 18
3. Calvin Johnson*+ · DET 16
4. Jordy Nelson · GNB 15
Ray Rice* · BAL 15
6. Cam Newton · CAR 14
7. Marshawn Lynch · SEA 13
Adrian Peterson · MIN 13
9. Arian Foster* · HOU 12
10. Ahmad Bradshaw · NYG 11
Maurice Jones-Drew*+ · JAX 11
Jimmy Graham* · NOR 11
BenJarvus Green-Ellis · NWE 11
Laurent Robinson · DAL 11
Michael Turner · ATL 11
Rugby Saint II likes this.

Saints proved that pigs could fly in 2009.
Now its time for another miracle SuperBowl and go where no pig has gone before.


Last edited by pherein; 06-25-2012 at 07:32 AM..
pherein is offline  
Old 06-25-2012, 07:33 AM   #9
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 3,923
Blog Entries: 3
[quote=pherein;414338]"Yeah, that was a great play , but if you watch Gronk he drags guys down the field every week,makes defenders look silly after the catch.
Graham has been tackled by 1 5'10 CB or safety way more than he gets away.

Graham was targeted 30 more times than Gronk last season. I think the YAC is valid in Gronks case. He is never as open as Graham is. Your right YAC is overrated in a lot of cases, but not is this case I believe.
Graham needs to improve in this area, and even if he never does, I don't think it matters.
In the end what really matters is who can catch better for a TE, and thats clearly Graham. He catches things only Colston could".


Fair enough. A lot of that is Jimmy still trying to bulk up, after being a basketball player for so long. I don't suspect they'll try to add much more weight to him though, because at some point it starts to slow your foot speed.
pherein likes this.

If I had a nickel for every time I heard that, the NFL would fine and suspend me.
burningmetal is offline  
Old 06-25-2012, 07:46 AM   #10
failclownHunter
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: N.O. and V.A.
Posts: 2,260
Blog Entries: 3
Originally Posted by burningmetal View Post

Fair enough. A lot of that is Jimmy still trying to bulk up, after being a basketball player for so long. I don't suspect they'll try to add much more weight to him though, because at some point it starts to slow your foot speed.
Thats a Very good point. He might have been a little clumsy last season with all the added weight, that never occurred to me.
pherein is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/44864-graham-not-better-than-gronkowski.html
Posted By For Type Date Hits
Graham is not better than Gronkowski This thread Refback 06-24-2012 07:09 PM 11


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:26 AM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts