|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by SloMotion Really guy? 'crack coated pubic hair covering his eyes' , I expect that kind of garbage on a Detroit board or an Atlanta board, but not on B&G. You disappoint me ... the stats I'm reading ...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 9,060
|
Originally Posted by SloMotion
I would rather have someone that actually gets yards all year round than a guy who may have a higher "rushing average" for 8 games. This is about real production not stats. Stats do not matter one bit it just gives nerds something to argue about when they are wrong. Winning and producing is what counts not stats.
![]()
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Truth Addict
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,756
|
Rushing- I'll take Sproles
Receiving - Sproles Kick Returns - Sproles Punt returns - Sproles 40 yard dash in shorts - Gotta go with Bush. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Professor Crab and
Site Donor 2014 |
Sproles didn't have Reggie's numbers? Is this guy misreading the statistics because crack coated pubic hair are covering his eyes?
Why was this even published? Are people that desperate? |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Truth Addict
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,756
|
Rushing average
Reggie - 4.3 per carry Sproles -5.2 per carry Receiving Average Reggie - 7.2 per rec Sproles -9.1 per rec Punt Return Average Reggie - 7.9 per return Sproles -8.6 per return Why is this even a debate? |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Site Donor
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Bayou Bayfield CO
Posts: 4,722
|
It'll be interesting to compare these two in a couple of years. I will say this right now: don't know about the Fin's fans, but we Who Dats sure aren't feelin' cheated by this particular exchange.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Professor Crab and
Site Donor 2014 |
Sorry SloMo, I mistakenly thought you were quoting the article written, not giving your opinion. And, btw, I was agreeing with you that Sproles is superior, it should not be an issue, and someone getting paid to write such drivel had the metaphorical visual distortion.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cypress Tx.
Posts: 19,047
|
Sproles = Weapon.
Bush - tool |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Deuce
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,894
|
I would agree that on the surface it would appear that this is not even a debate...Sproles hands down. However, if I speculate...
Reggie was so good coming out of college. It's like someone said, "Sproles did everything we expected Reggie to do!" Is it possible, though, that Reggie has been heavily accounted for ever since he came into the league? Is it possible that with everybody paying so much attention to Reggie, other players were allowed to flourish, like Colston as an example. To take it a step further, is it really stretching to say that once people started paying attention to the other guys after Reggie left that they were able to do some of the things they always wanted to do with Reggie but couldn't because they were paying so much attention to him being on the field. I think that another poster said that we might have a clearer view a couple of years later, but since RB's have such a short career expectancy...we just may never know. |
Whether you think you can or think you can't...you're right!
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/46127-darren-sproles-vs-reggie-bush-whos-superior-weapon.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
Darren Sproles vs. Reggie Bush: Who's the superior weapon? | This thread | Refback | 07-17-2012 09:39 PM | 1 |