Register All Albums FAQ Community Experience
Go Back   New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints

Mark Ingram's Woes

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by Danno We didn't miss your point, we just disagree that he was a sure thing to play in 2011. And even so that gave us ONE RB to depend on, and there was no guarantee that he'd ...

Like Tree21Likes

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-28-2012, 06:04 PM   #1
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 3,923
Blog Entries: 3
Re: Mark Ingram's Woes

Originally Posted by Danno View Post
We didn't miss your point, we just disagree that he was a sure thing to play in 2011. And even so that gave us ONE RB to depend on, and there was no guarantee that he'd be fully healed.

So again, RB was a need.
Did you read the post I was replying to? He said we should discuss the fact that Pierre was in a contract year, but I had already mentioned that Pierre was signed before the draft. I was speaking directly to him.

Now you can disagree with me all you want, but look at the results. I said it then, and I'm still saying that he was a bad choice. The Saints under Sean Payton will always be a RB by committee, because that's how his system works. You don't waste a first round pick on a committee player when you are starving for a pass rusher or a linebacker who can actually run with TE's and RB's, as the Saints were.

That is my opinion, and I see nothing to suggest it isn't a valid one, but say what you will.

If I had a nickel for every time I heard that, the NFL would fine and suspend me.
burningmetal is offline  
Old 09-28-2012, 06:22 PM   #2
Truth Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,758
Re: Mark Ingram's Woes

Originally Posted by burningmetal View Post
Now you can disagree with me all you want, but look at the results.
Results have nothing to do with the fact that RB was a need when we picked him, but say what you will.
Danno is offline  
Old 09-30-2012, 05:49 AM   #3
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 3,923
Blog Entries: 3
Re: Mark Ingram's Woes

Originally Posted by Danno View Post
Results have nothing to do with the fact that RB was a need when we picked him, but say what you will.
The results show that we didn't need any RB's. You assumed it was a need. There were greater needs, it's very simple.

And don't misunderstand me, I totally get the whole 'you can never have too many RB's' line in theory. I get that there was at least a chance that these guys wouldn't come back fully healthy. But unfortunately there are only so many roster spots to be had, and we needed to upgrade the weakness of our team. Even with no RB's, our offense is better than most, usually. Not as good obviously, but still good enough to win if we could ever have a solid defense.

Right now we have all of our weapons and we still can't beat anybody because the whole team is in a funk. But that's a whole different story.

If I had a nickel for every time I heard that, the NFL would fine and suspend me.
burningmetal is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/51017-mark-ingrams-woes.html
Posted By For Type Date Hits
Mark Ingram's Woes This thread Refback 09-27-2012 08:22 AM 5


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:59 PM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts