|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; I was really excited about Ingram when we picked him but right now he needs to sit. Ain't much happening when he gets the ball. I'd prefer to see Ivory get 20-25 touches in a game and se what that ...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Resident Swede
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Märsta, Sweden
Posts: 8,049
|
Re: Mark Ingram's role becoming clear
I was really excited about Ingram when we picked him but right now he needs to sit. Ain't much happening when he gets the ball. I'd prefer to see Ivory get 20-25 touches in a game and se what that would do to our offense.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Site Donor 2015
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Land Mass between LA and AL
Posts: 4,375
|
Re: Mark Ingram's role becoming clear
And the screen game seems to have disappeared.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Newport News, VA
Posts: 1,583
|
Re: Mark Ingram's role becoming clear
My opinion on our running backs
1. PT 2. Sproles 3. Ivory 4. Cadet 5. Collins 10. Ingram = Showcase for trade |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
1000 Posts +
|
Re: Mark Ingram's role becoming clear
Pete decided to change everything for this game and he did. He changed the winning strategy to a losing strategy.
I hope he changes it back. I hate change. Alaska |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Grand Haven, Michigan by way of a little Mississippi River town in Louisiana
Posts: 5,893
|
Re: Mark Ingram's role becoming clear
Ivory looked like he was going to catch fire at times last night just to go sit down, I would have rode on his back the entire game then sub Ingram in for a breath or 2. In my opionion we have to many running backs and don't know what to do with them all, now someone can say thats not a bad thing but is it if you can't play them all properly, there are other positions that could definatly be addressed, I'm all for depth but damn!! I would play Sproles very sparingly, look, he's back and we get 60 yds, and when he's not 140 or so, figure it out, it's not working.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Bounty Money $$$
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 5800 Airline Dr. Metairie, LA.
Posts: 24,182
|
Re: Mark Ingram's role becoming clear
Simply put Ingram doen't fit the system and therefore he was a bad pick. According to Payton he drafted Ingram because he promised his son that he would. It's right there in his book.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
SaintSince67
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: PortCity
Posts: 2,044
|
Re: Mark Ingram's role becoming clear
Someone needs to tell Ingram to be decisive.
Year two, he is still running up peoples back and stopping his forward momentum. He won't get a 2nd chance in the NFL to get going again. Pick a gap, stick your head in it, and drive forward! Learn how to be happy with 3 or 4 until something breaks for him. Break it outside if it's all stacked up, but do it quickly. He still seams to be cutting his big boy teeth. I hope he gets there sooner rather than later. |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Katy, Tx a suburb of Houston
Posts: 2,089
|
Re: Mark Ingram's role becoming clear
Originally Posted by darstep
This offense stunts his growth as much as him just hitting the whole and getting the 2.2 yards per carry. Looks like Alabama backs need 20 touches per to notch good games. We don't have the carries for him to be a successful back, and we are all over the place with the backs we do have. ![]()
For me shipping 2 or even three backs wouldn't be out of the question if I could get one or two who I knew would be there healthy when I needed!!!! |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Site Donor
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: in line with my ridiculous CLEAR PLASTIC BAG
Posts: 3,650
Blog Entries: 3
|
Re: Mark Ingram's role becoming clear
Originally Posted by alleycat_126
We tried that already, it didn't work, maybe you don't remember '10? That's a huge part of why Ingram is here. That's basically why the "3-headed monster" of Thomas/Bush/Bell in '09 has become the "four headed monster" of today.![]()
Also, people tend to argue in circles about this stuff, I do like the discussion, it's fun. But I say, again and again, Mark Ingram is here for TOMORROW, not today. He is very likely going to be the guy who takes Pierre's place as workhorse back in 3-4 years. The same way Pierre was groomed to take the mantle over from Deuce. We're just not seeing it yet. |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
500th Post
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 843
|
Originally Posted by Danno
Ever the optimist. Haters just keep on hating. ![]()
His body of work extends long before this training camp and he has proven he can play pretty darn well. To me it's clear that we jumped on an opportunity to get Ingram in the draft so we took it and but now everyone is trying to post rationalize his credibility when the numbers don't merit it. |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/53148-mark-ingrams-role-becoming-clear.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
The Latest Chris Ivory News | SportSpyder | This thread | Refback | 11-23-2012 08:37 PM | 2 |
The Latest New Orleans Saints News | SportSpyder | This thread | Refback | 11-23-2012 07:59 PM | 7 |
The Latest Darren Sproles News | SportSpyder | This thread | Refback | 11-23-2012 06:55 PM | 1 |
Mark Ingram's role becoming clear | This thread | Refback | 11-23-2012 06:35 PM | 2 |