|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; BROOKS, GRANT HAVE MILE-HIGH FRACAS A league source tells us that Saints quarterback Aaron Brooks and defensive end Charles Grant got into a rumble on the flight back from the team's 34-10 pasting at the hands of the Arizona Cardinals. ...
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-04-2004, 03:57 PM | #1 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,020
|
And the Answer is :
BROOKS, GRANT HAVE MILE-HIGH FRACAS
A league source tells us that Saints quarterback Aaron Brooks and defensive end Charles Grant got into a rumble on the flight back from the team's 34-10 pasting at the hands of the Arizona Cardinals. Though we don't know who started it or whether any damage was done to either player (or to the plane), the thinking in Saints land is that the scrum might push the team toward maximizing its potential in 2004. Fortunately for the Saints, they'll go nearly three weeks without having to hop another flight. On Sunday, they face the Bucs at home. The following Sunday, they host the Vikings on ESPN. And their ability to sweep the coming home stand will go a long way toward proving whether the scuffle will make any difference for a team that went from promising to underachieving via a 3-hour stint in the desert on Sunday. http://www.profootballtalk.com/rumormill.htm Anyone wanna bet the arguement was not over the last chicken wing .... Saintfan ???? [Edited on 4/10/2004 by saintz08] |
Latest Blogs | |
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn
Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey
CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey |
10-04-2004, 04:01 PM | #2 |
Donated Plasma
|
And the Answer is :
|
10-04-2004, 04:01 PM | #3 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,020
|
And the Answer is :
The team is coming apart at the seams . Maybe Grant said \" J.T. should start cause he could lead the offense better then you against a worthless defense like Arizona \" .... |
10-04-2004, 04:02 PM | #4 |
Donated Plasma
|
And the Answer is :
|
10-04-2004, 04:05 PM | #5 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,020
|
And the Answer is :
[Edited on 4/10/2004 by saintz08] |
10-04-2004, 04:20 PM | #6 |
Donated Plasma
|
And the Answer is :
|
10-04-2004, 05:17 PM | #7 |
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 85
|
And the Answer is :
Well **** I don\'t blame him your gonna let a 36 year old run for 100 some yards what a joke. My Chaney Highshool squad of 96 could stop Emmit from rushing 100 yards. The current squad of 2004 could too.
GEAUX SAINTS. WHO DAT GONNA BEAT DEM SAINTS WHO DAT WHO DAT. WHO DAT GONNA CHUCK THAT THAT ROCK STECKER STECKER. I gotta layoff the crack lmao |
10-04-2004, 05:27 PM | #8 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,020
|
And the Answer is :
B . Repeat the snap count twice in the huddle at the end of the play call , Call cadence louder at the line . C. Make the read faster and lead the receivers with the ball . D. Take some heat off the ball , hands sweat in the desert heat . [Edited on 4/10/2004 by saintz08] |
10-04-2004, 05:38 PM | #9 |
Donated Plasma
|
And the Answer is :
I guess you missed the Non Call then. You know, the one where there was holding in the end zone. You know...the one where our guy was holding the moment the ball was snapped (there are several other similar examples you must have missed). I\'m sure you\'ll fail to acknowledge that many catchable passes (some right on the numbers) were just thrown too \"hot\" to handle. Uh huh. Your agenda is as clear as ever. LMAO |
C'mon Man...
|
|
10-04-2004, 06:50 PM | #10 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,762
|
And the Answer is :
08 you\'ve collided with the ABB standard for post game evaluation.
Under the Anything But Brooks standard. By that I mean, if there is a loss, under no circumstance can Brooks play any part of explainting what went wrong. :icon_eyesroll: The inverse principle works during a win. If we win, ignore any other explanation because it\'s plain as day that Brooks single-handedly won the game by himself. :icon_bs: :kerry: |