Refs: Home Cooking?

SloMotion · 10-14-2013, 09:20 AM

Originally Posted by exile

Mike PereiraVerified account ‏@MikePereira

Some questioning the hit across the middle in New England, It was a shoulder to the chest. No head or neck contact. Not a foul.

Yeah, but there was shoulder-to-helmet contact/defenseless player and I see why they called it, though I vehemently disagree with them calling that one,

... it was so obvious Bush was doing everything in his power not to put a flagrant hit on the guy but still do the job the Saints sent him out there to do ... poor judgment and erring on the side of caution by the refs, IMO.

TheOak · 10-14-2013, 09:22 AM

Originally Posted by SloMotion

Yeah, but there was shoulder-to-helmet contact/defenseless player and I see why they called it, though I vehemently disagree with them calling that one, ... it was so obvious Bush was doing everything in his power not to put a flagrant hit on the guy but still do the job the Saints sent him out there to do ... poor judgment and erring on the side of caution by the refs, IMO.

The shoulder to helmet contact was not from a shoulder going into the side of the helmet, it was from the helmet going into the shoulder as the defender was right in front of him. There is a difference there.

SloMotion · 10-14-2013, 09:26 AM

Originally Posted by TheOak

The shoulder to helmet contact was not from a shoulder going into the side of the helmet, it was from the helmet going into the shoulder as the defender was right in front of him. There is a difference there.

Oh, sort of like the "tell your boobs to stop staring at my eyes" argument?

TheOak · 10-14-2013, 11:44 AM

Originally Posted by SloMotion

Oh, sort of like the "tell your boobs to stop staring at my eyes" argument?

There is a lot of sassy floating around here for a Monday.

SloMotion · 10-14-2013, 11:49 AM

Originally Posted by TheOak

There is a lot of sassy floating around here for a Monday.

I know, Caddieman even showed up and took a poke at me,

... appropriately in the Ultimate Smack Talk forum and according to board policy, I might add,

.

http://blackandgold.com/showthread.p...355#post538355

xan · 10-16-2013, 09:00 AM

Originally Posted by SloMotion

Oh, sort of like the "tell your boobs to stop staring at my eyes" argument?

hehe

exile · 10-14-2013, 09:22 AM

Originally Posted by SloMotion

poor judgment and erring on the side of caution by the refs, IMO.

Or just inept at their jobs.

10-14-2013, 09:20 AM	#1
SloMotion 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Jan 2012 Posts: 6,776 Blog Entries: 15	Re: Refs: Home Cooking? Originally Posted by exile Mike PereiraVerified account ‏@MikePereira Some questioning the hit across the middle in New England, It was a shoulder to the chest. No head or neck contact. Not a foul. Yeah, but there was shoulder-to-helmet contact/defenseless player and I see why they called it, though I vehemently disagree with them calling that one, ... it was so obvious Bush was doing everything in his power not to put a flagrant hit on the guy but still do the job the Saints sent him out there to do ... poor judgment and erring on the side of caution by the refs, IMO.

10-14-2013, 09:22 AM	#2
TheOak 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Cypress Tx. Posts: 19,039	Re: Refs: Home Cooking? Originally Posted by SloMotion Yeah, but there was shoulder-to-helmet contact/defenseless player and I see why they called it, though I vehemently disagree with them calling that one, ... it was so obvious Bush was doing everything in his power not to put a flagrant hit on the guy but still do the job the Saints sent him out there to do ... poor judgment and erring on the side of caution by the refs, IMO. The shoulder to helmet contact was not from a shoulder going into the side of the helmet, it was from the helmet going into the shoulder as the defender was right in front of him. There is a difference there.

10-14-2013, 09:26 AM	#3
SloMotion 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Jan 2012 Posts: 6,776 Blog Entries: 15	Re: Refs: Home Cooking? Originally Posted by TheOak The shoulder to helmet contact was not from a shoulder going into the side of the helmet, it was from the helmet going into the shoulder as the defender was right in front of him. There is a difference there. Oh, sort of like the "tell your boobs to stop staring at my eyes" argument? xan and hagan714 like this.

10-14-2013, 11:44 AM	#4
TheOak 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Cypress Tx. Posts: 19,039	Re: Refs: Home Cooking? Originally Posted by SloMotion Oh, sort of like the "tell your boobs to stop staring at my eyes" argument? There is a lot of sassy floating around here for a Monday. SloMotion likes this.

10-14-2013, 11:49 AM	#5
SloMotion 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Jan 2012 Posts: 6,776 Blog Entries: 15	Re: Refs: Home Cooking? Originally Posted by TheOak There is a lot of sassy floating around here for a Monday. I know, Caddieman even showed up and took a poke at me, ... appropriately in the Ultimate Smack Talk forum and according to board policy, I might add, . http://blackandgold.com/showthread.p...355#post538355

10-16-2013, 09:00 AM	#6
xan Professor Crab and Site Donor 2014 Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Princeton Posts: 3,372 Blog Entries: 34	Re: Refs: Home Cooking? Originally Posted by SloMotion Oh, sort of like the "tell your boobs to stop staring at my eyes" argument? hehe SloMotion likes this.

10-14-2013, 09:22 AM	#7
exile Cake or Death? Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 3,608	Re: Refs: Home Cooking? Originally Posted by SloMotion poor judgment and erring on the side of caution by the refs, IMO. Or just inept at their jobs. onebyone likes this.
exile Cake or Death? Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 3,608

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/61132-refs-home-cooking.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
The Latest New Orleans Saints News \| SportSpyder	This thread	Refback	10-11-2013 05:05 PM	2
Refs: Home Cooking?	This thread	Refback	10-11-2013 04:46 PM	9