Who to cut (cap hits included)

jeanpierre · 01-30-2014, 07:16 PM

Originally Posted by TheOak

"If" I were the 32 owners I would change the way the league pays and go to a structured pay scale. Let them make the lions share in endorsements, which would also clean the league up a good bit...EG - A starting QB would make 10m a year salary period. He gets a bonus for perfect record, playoffs, SB etc... It does away with all the over and under paid BS. Each and every position would have a price tag, and the salary would be paid out weekly per game so if the QB went to crap and got benched he would receive BU money the next week. But thats a pipe dream...

Wow, just had this very conversation, debate with some friends...

A couple of the problems we discovered were...

(1) Situation, Terrell and Keyshawn on the same team arguing who got the ball threw to him more and in better situations...

One Remedy was to put the Lion Share of the money in bonus pac for W-L record, Division Title, Conference Title, Lombardi...

(2) Situation, What happens to the innovators and the innovations to the game?!? Not many TE's are used like Jimmy Graham; so should his earning power be limited because he's far and away from most of the pack of TE's as a receiver? If it had been a preset salary, would Coach Payton still have gotten same effort, commitment from an equally talented Tight End not name Jimmy Graham?!?

Remedy suggested was like the Salary Cap, the individual positions, both salaries and actual position descriptions would be subject to a sliding scale...

(2a) How do you compare ILB in a 34 to an ILB in a 43; or better still, how do you get a 34 NT or DE to focus on occupying Olinemen when his counter part in a 43 is racking up the stats...

Remedy was that sacks are also a team effort and that the Team Sacks would only be used to calculate related bonuses - well that didn't fly...

(3) Would there be Anti-Trust Exposure Ramifications by "limiting earning power" at a position?

While the counter argument would be that the emphasis is on the performance (winning) and the players have a pool of 60%-65% of the revenues to divide; point of law may say you're still limited an individual's earning power in a monopolized market...

It's an ambitious idea; the devil will be in the details...

TheOak · 01-30-2014, 08:22 PM

Originally Posted by jeanpierre

Wow, just had this very conversation, debate with some friends...

A couple of the problems we discovered were...

(1) Situation, Terrell and Keyshawn on the same team arguing who got the ball threw to him more and in better situations...

One Remedy was to put the Lion Share of the money in bonus pac for W-L record, Division Title, Conference Title, Lombardi...

(2) Situation, What happens to the innovators and the innovations to the game?!? Not many TE's are used like Jimmy Graham; so should his earning power be limited because he's far and away from most of the pack of TE's as a receiver? If it had been a preset salary, would Coach Payton still have gotten same effort, commitment from an equally talented Tight End not name Jimmy Graham?!?

Remedy suggested was like the Salary Cap, the individual positions, both salaries and actual position descriptions would be subject to a sliding scale...

(2a) How do you compare ILB in a 34 to an ILB in a 43; or better still, how do you get a 34 NT or DE to focus on occupying Olinemen when his counter part in a 43 is racking up the stats...

Remedy was that sacks are also a team effort and that the Team Sacks would only be used to calculate related bonuses - well that didn't fly...

(3) Would there be Anti-Trust Exposure Ramifications by "limiting earning power" at a position?

While the counter argument would be that the emphasis is on the performance (winning) and the players have a pool of 60%-65% of the revenues to divide; point of law may say you're still limited an individual's earning power in a monopolized market...

It's an ambitious idea; the devil will be in the details...

I think you may be over thinking the anti-trust concern. Nearly all companies have pay bands for each job description they have, salary is salary.

Example: QBs pay band is (500k-1m for non starters)
(3m - 10m for starters)
Team decides where they fall in that pay band.

I wouldn't delve into a performance incentive bonus program as the whole ocean of ambiguous accountability that is the NFL as we presently know it would defiantly implode if a wrong call by a referee cost a player a bonus.

Where is the motivation? Certainly a player that will play for 10 million a year will play just as hard for 2 million a year. If not, there is the CFL or they are welcome to test the job market with their unused degree in whatever field they chose to study. Good luck pulling 6 figures with a Physical Education degree, or a Marketing degree and zero experience.

Remember.... There was a time when players played till they broke and bled for less than 100k/year.

If all fk that doesn't work there is a sizable delta between the QB pay bands, big enough to play your best or the next week when you don't start your check reflects the lower pay band.

Personally I have a freakin issue with something called "work out bonus". It's their job.

As I see it the league is responsible for healthcare and a salary within the pay-band. The onus for all other income a player wants or feels he needs falls on that player. He can go out and seek enforcements.

An 18 year old soldier has the burden of staying alive and keeping his buddies alive. These college educated 23+ year olds can't balance their own check book and manage their own urges.

jeanpierre · 02-02-2014, 12:42 AM

Originally Posted by TheOak

I think you may be over thinking the anti-trust concern. Nearly all companies have pay bands for each job description they have, salary is salary.

Few companies have anti-trust status, whole different set of rules...

Originally Posted by TheOak

These college educated 23+ year olds can't balance their own check book and manage their own urges.

LOL - not laughing at you, laughing at the hypocrisy of these players and their "college educations"...

They're some that truly improve themselves - applaud that and that's the way it should be; most have study hall with tutors as well as "special assistance" when taking examinations...

Then, there's the ever challenging curriculum with examples such as Urban Planning Engineering, Hotel Business Management, Sub-Continental Studies, or my personal favorite, Kinesiological Exercise Science (formerly Phys-Ed)...

TheOak · 02-02-2014, 04:35 AM

Originally Posted by jeanpierre

Few companies have anti-trust status, whole different set of rules.

Antitrust for the NFL centers more around collusion, conduct, and market. Antitrust in the NFL's case is why there are no games on Friday or Saturday because that would infringe on College and HS Football... College football viewership is the biggest concern.

Obviously any ideas you or I have would never float past the NFLPA unless there is hefty comp beyond salary and bonus. However, after that was done you could do away with the NFLPA.

Also, if you can cap rookies you can implement paybands.

If pay bands were implemented you put Condon back in jeans because it would severely strip his income.

01-30-2014, 07:16 PM	#1
jeanpierre Site Donor 2018 Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Thibodaux Posts: 43,543 Blog Entries: 39	Re: Who to cut (cap hits included) Originally Posted by TheOak "If" I were the 32 owners I would change the way the league pays and go to a structured pay scale. Let them make the lions share in endorsements, which would also clean the league up a good bit...EG - A starting QB would make 10m a year salary period. He gets a bonus for perfect record, playoffs, SB etc... It does away with all the over and under paid BS. Each and every position would have a price tag, and the salary would be paid out weekly per game so if the QB went to crap and got benched he would receive BU money the next week. But thats a pipe dream... Wow, just had this very conversation, debate with some friends... A couple of the problems we discovered were... (1) Situation, Terrell and Keyshawn on the same team arguing who got the ball threw to him more and in better situations... One Remedy was to put the Lion Share of the money in bonus pac for W-L record, Division Title, Conference Title, Lombardi... (2) Situation, What happens to the innovators and the innovations to the game?!? Not many TE's are used like Jimmy Graham; so should his earning power be limited because he's far and away from most of the pack of TE's as a receiver? If it had been a preset salary, would Coach Payton still have gotten same effort, commitment from an equally talented Tight End not name Jimmy Graham?!? Remedy suggested was like the Salary Cap, the individual positions, both salaries and actual position descriptions would be subject to a sliding scale... (2a) How do you compare ILB in a 34 to an ILB in a 43; or better still, how do you get a 34 NT or DE to focus on occupying Olinemen when his counter part in a 43 is racking up the stats... Remedy was that sacks are also a team effort and that the Team Sacks would only be used to calculate related bonuses - well that didn't fly... (3) Would there be Anti-Trust Exposure Ramifications by "limiting earning power" at a position? While the counter argument would be that the emphasis is on the performance (winning) and the players have a pool of 60%-65% of the revenues to divide; point of law may say you're still limited an individual's earning power in a monopolized market... It's an ambitious idea; the devil will be in the details... hagan714 likes this.
	It's not that my way is the right way, I just make the right way my way...

01-30-2014, 08:22 PM	#2
TheOak 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Cypress Tx. Posts: 19,047	Re: Who to cut (cap hits included) Originally Posted by jeanpierre Wow, just had this very conversation, debate with some friends... A couple of the problems we discovered were... (1) Situation, Terrell and Keyshawn on the same team arguing who got the ball threw to him more and in better situations... One Remedy was to put the Lion Share of the money in bonus pac for W-L record, Division Title, Conference Title, Lombardi... (2) Situation, What happens to the innovators and the innovations to the game?!? Not many TE's are used like Jimmy Graham; so should his earning power be limited because he's far and away from most of the pack of TE's as a receiver? If it had been a preset salary, would Coach Payton still have gotten same effort, commitment from an equally talented Tight End not name Jimmy Graham?!? Remedy suggested was like the Salary Cap, the individual positions, both salaries and actual position descriptions would be subject to a sliding scale... (2a) How do you compare ILB in a 34 to an ILB in a 43; or better still, how do you get a 34 NT or DE to focus on occupying Olinemen when his counter part in a 43 is racking up the stats... Remedy was that sacks are also a team effort and that the Team Sacks would only be used to calculate related bonuses - well that didn't fly... (3) Would there be Anti-Trust Exposure Ramifications by "limiting earning power" at a position? While the counter argument would be that the emphasis is on the performance (winning) and the players have a pool of 60%-65% of the revenues to divide; point of law may say you're still limited an individual's earning power in a monopolized market... It's an ambitious idea; the devil will be in the details... I think you may be over thinking the anti-trust concern. Nearly all companies have pay bands for each job description they have, salary is salary. Example: QBs pay band is (500k-1m for non starters) (3m - 10m for starters) Team decides where they fall in that pay band. I wouldn't delve into a performance incentive bonus program as the whole ocean of ambiguous accountability that is the NFL as we presently know it would defiantly implode if a wrong call by a referee cost a player a bonus. Where is the motivation? Certainly a player that will play for 10 million a year will play just as hard for 2 million a year. If not, there is the CFL or they are welcome to test the job market with their unused degree in whatever field they chose to study. Good luck pulling 6 figures with a Physical Education degree, or a Marketing degree and zero experience. Remember.... There was a time when players played till they broke and bled for less than 100k/year. If all fk that doesn't work there is a sizable delta between the QB pay bands, big enough to play your best or the next week when you don't start your check reflects the lower pay band. Personally I have a freakin issue with something called "work out bonus". It's their job. As I see it the league is responsible for healthcare and a salary within the pay-band. The onus for all other income a player wants or feels he needs falls on that player. He can go out and seek enforcements. An 18 year old soldier has the burden of staying alive and keeping his buddies alive. These college educated 23+ year olds can't balance their own check book and manage their own urges. hagan714 likes this.
	It's not what you look at that matters, it's what you see. ~ Henry David Thoreau

02-02-2014, 12:42 AM	#3
jeanpierre Site Donor 2018 Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Thibodaux Posts: 43,543 Blog Entries: 39	Re: Who to cut (cap hits included) Originally Posted by TheOak I think you may be over thinking the anti-trust concern. Nearly all companies have pay bands for each job description they have, salary is salary. Few companies have anti-trust status, whole different set of rules... Originally Posted by TheOak These college educated 23+ year olds can't balance their own check book and manage their own urges. LOL - not laughing at you, laughing at the hypocrisy of these players and their "college educations"... They're some that truly improve themselves - applaud that and that's the way it should be; most have study hall with tutors as well as "special assistance" when taking examinations... Then, there's the ever challenging curriculum with examples such as Urban Planning Engineering, Hotel Business Management, Sub-Continental Studies, or my personal favorite, Kinesiological Exercise Science (formerly Phys-Ed)...
	Last edited by jeanpierre; 02-02-2014 at 12:53 AM..

02-02-2014, 04:35 AM	#4
TheOak 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Cypress Tx. Posts: 19,047	Re: Who to cut (cap hits included) Originally Posted by jeanpierre Few companies have anti-trust status, whole different set of rules. Antitrust for the NFL centers more around collusion, conduct, and market. Antitrust in the NFL's case is why there are no games on Friday or Saturday because that would infringe on College and HS Football... College football viewership is the biggest concern. Obviously any ideas you or I have would never float past the NFLPA unless there is hefty comp beyond salary and bonus. However, after that was done you could do away with the NFLPA. Also, if you can cap rookies you can implement paybands. If pay bands were implemented you put Condon back in jeans because it would severely strip his income.
	It's not what you look at that matters, it's what you see. ~ Henry David Thoreau

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/64032-who-cut-cap-hits-included.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
The Latest New Orleans Saints News \| SportSpyder	This thread	Refback	01-24-2014 04:25 PM	9
Who to cut (cap hits included)	This thread	Refback	01-24-2014 03:29 PM	74