|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by ScottF Exactly my thought. What do we OWE Jimmy Graham? Yes, HE signed his rookie contract, and who would know how unbelievably great he would turn out? Well, maybe Loomis, who 'gambled' on a 3rd round pick ...
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-02-2014, 10:06 AM | #21 |
Threaded by Danno
Truth Addict
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,723
Rating:
(0 votes - average)
Originally Posted by ScottF
Doesn't work that way, unless all the busts are also forced to give the owner back all the money they didn't earn.
Rookie contracts are for earning what the owner/GM think you'll be worth. You 2nd/3rd/4th contract is based on what the owner/GM think you'll be worth. The only way to make that a bit more fair is to go to one year contracts for everyone, or base each players pay on what they did the previous season. Play 1st, then get paid for how well you did. |
|
Views: 12830
|
Latest Blogs | |
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn
Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey
CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey |
03-02-2014, 10:36 AM | #22 |
1000 Posts +
|
Re: Saints could lose Jimmy Graham with non-exclusive tag
Honestly guys, what team in their right mind would give a first round pick this year and next year plus take on his salary??? They made this deal so outrageous that I cant possibly see any team with 1/2 a brain take this offer.
Seriously, play GM here for a minute, would you give a first rounder this year, next year and 12 mil for one player? No way in hell. They will ink out a deal but this will linger most of the offseason. |
03-02-2014, 10:42 AM | #23 |
1000 Posts +
|
Re: Saints could lose Jimmy Graham with non-exclusive tag
Hold up your end of the bargin hommie.
New Orleans Saints' Jimmy Graham says he'll retire when Drew Brees retires - Video | NOLA.com |
03-02-2014, 11:34 AM | #24 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 6,324
|
Re: Saints could lose Jimmy Graham with non-exclusive tag
Originally Posted by Danno
Yeah, I know it doesn't... just wanted to give some perspective with all the Graham indignation going on.
I like your line of thinking...Can we get Jimmy a signing bonus check with the names Sullivan, Smith or Ellis on the signature line? |
03-02-2014, 12:08 PM | #25 |
Bounty Money $$$
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 5800 Airline Dr. Metairie, LA.
Posts: 24,073
|
Re: Saints could lose Jimmy Graham with non-exclusive tag
It is looking less and less like we can afford him.
|
03-02-2014, 12:14 PM | #26 |
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 60
|
Re: Saints could lose Jimmy Graham with non-exclusive tag
Originally Posted by B_Dub_Saint
Expanding on this a bit...the more I think about it, the more I realize it was a GENIUS move with some nice potential. IF a team makes him an offer, it's probably going to be discounted because they are also having to give up two first rounders in addition to his salary (my whole analysis is dependent on this - if someone throws huge money at him then my argument fails lol)...So let's say someone does make him a offer. It will most likely be less than the WR tag we will have to pay without them making him an offer and even less than what he is looking for in a long term deal. It sets us up for a potential DISCOUNT. Then instead of matching their lowball offer, we turn round and ink him for a better long term deal than he was offered (but still lower than what we would have paid without letting other teams make offers) and become the saving grace. Everyone is happy.
Am I delusional or does this make perfect sense? |
03-02-2014, 12:42 PM | #27 |
5000 POSTS! +
|
Re: Saints could lose Jimmy Graham with non-exclusive tag
Originally Posted by FeelTheBrees
They have to better the offer he is currently under. I can't see a team pulling the trigger on a deal like this. About half of them could with the cap space but giving up two 1st rounders??? yikes.
|
03-02-2014, 12:42 PM | #28 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,524
|
Re: Saints could lose Jimmy Graham with non-exclusive tag
The Saints have had 15 TE's in the Payton era, what's one more?
|
03-02-2014, 01:17 PM | #29 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Kenner, LA
Posts: 7,935
|
Re: Saints could lose Jimmy Graham with non-exclusive tag
Originally Posted by ScottF
Consider 8-8 and 9-7 or one and done in the playoffs the residual effect of giving a TE $12 million a year.
|
03-02-2014, 01:37 PM | #30 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 6,324
|
Re: Saints could lose Jimmy Graham with non-exclusive tag
Originally Posted by rezburna
I am not advocating paying him 12mill.
My point is everyone is saying he is crazy bc his is supposedly asking for $4mil more than he is worth, but no one had a problem when he made $4mil less than his worth |
|
|
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/64578-saints-could-lose-jimmy-graham-non-exclusive-tag.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
The Latest New Orleans Saints News | SportSpyder | This thread | Refback | 03-01-2014 08:11 PM | 10 |
Saints could lose Jimmy Graham with non-exclusive tag | This thread | Refback | 03-01-2014 07:38 PM | 129 |