Register All Albums FAQ Community Experience
Go Back   New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints

Saints could lose Jimmy Graham with non-exclusive tag

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; I like our backups. They will not put up JG numbers but they will not get JG money either. May just be time to cut him loose. 2 rd 1's from the right team would be awesome. We could resign ...

Like Tree41Likes

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-02-2014, 01:52 PM   #31
Threaded by voodooido
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,770

Show Printable Version Email this Page
Rating: (0 votes - average)

I like our backups. They will not put up JG numbers but they will not get JG money either. May just be time to cut him loose. 2 rd 1's from the right team would be awesome. We could resign Zach and DLP with money left over. This could be the start of multiple Superbowls.


I would not pay over 8.5 a year for him. He said before that as long as Drew is a Saint than he will be also. Lets call him on it.
Views: 12835
Old 03-02-2014, 02:22 PM   #32
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Kenner, LA
Posts: 7,935
Re: Saints could lose Jimmy Graham with non-exclusive tag

Originally Posted by ScottF View Post
I am not advocating paying him 12mill.
My point is everyone is saying he is crazy bc his is supposedly asking for $4mil more than he is worth, but no one had a problem when he made $4mil less than his worth
When he signed the contract nobody knew he'd produce the way he has. I watched him at Miami. Dropped pass after pass. I was pissed we drafted him. He proved me wrong in a lot of ways. I rather have Vernon Davis though. And I agree, nobody had anything to say when he was getting underpaid, but nobody would've been mad if we gave him $7 or $8 million last year or the year before. He knew the whole time he was going to wait until now and chase double figures. In no way do I believe we haven't offered him an extension before this year.

"The first need of a free people is to define their own terms.” - Stokely Carmichael
rezburna is offline  
Old 03-02-2014, 02:35 PM   #33
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Mandeville, LA
Posts: 38,201
Blog Entries: 29
Re: Saints could lose Jimmy Graham with non-exclusive tag

The Pats would not bulldoze their cap with a similar signing... Why should we?
|Mitch| and halloween 65 like this.
SmashMouth is offline  
Old 03-02-2014, 03:13 PM   #34
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 6,324
Re: Saints could lose Jimmy Graham with non-exclusive tag

Originally Posted by SmashMouth View Post
The Pats would not bulldoze their cap with a similar signing... Why should we?
The Pats currently have the highest paid TE in the NFL. The diff is they have significantly less money tied up at QB.
ScottF is offline  
Old 03-02-2014, 07:48 PM   #35
10000 POST CLUB
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 11,358
Re: Saints could lose Jimmy Graham with non-exclusive tag

I'd send his huge contract to another team for 1 more first round draft pick, if we got a top 10 pick and then pick at 27 I'd be happy to send him packing

we won a superbowl without him
dizzle88 is offline  
Old 03-02-2014, 11:48 PM   #36
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 9,050
Re: Saints could lose Jimmy Graham with non-exclusive tag

Sorry but if some team offers us two first rounders for him and the FO doesn't take it they are idiots.
The Dude is offline  
Old 03-03-2014, 07:26 AM   #37
10000 POST CLUB
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 13,101
Re: Saints could lose Jimmy Graham with non-exclusive tag

If there's no news create news, huh ESPN? Jimmy ain't going no where. plain and simple
spkb25 is offline  
Old 03-03-2014, 07:28 AM   #38
10000 POST CLUB
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cypress Tx.
Posts: 19,027
Re: Saints could lose Jimmy Graham with non-exclusive tag

Traditionally 2xFirst round draft picks would only go to an elite QB.

All this NEFT did was what it was intended to do. Buy Loomis some time, I believe we have until mid July to sign Kimmy to a long term deal.
The Dude likes this.
TheOak is offline  
Old 03-03-2014, 08:20 AM   #39
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,469
Re: Saints could lose Jimmy Graham with non-exclusive tag

All I can say to Jimmy is, did you see what happened to Robert Meachem? Do you see how relieved and happy he was to get back to NO? That'll be you in two years. You have to remember, Drew is a large part of JG's success. Going elsewhere doesn't guarantee continued success or a ring. I think the Saints are seeing if Graham is gonna go against his word and catch passes from another QB.
Marlboro Man is offline  
Old 03-03-2014, 09:05 AM   #40
10000 POST CLUB
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 11,358
Re: Saints could lose Jimmy Graham with non-exclusive tag

Jimmy benefits from paytons system and drews knowledge of the game

if he goes to another team and has to play TE, he will struggle because he can't block

he isn't worth 12 mil, talking all that BS shouting at seahawks players pregame and then wimped out when earl thomas hit him a couple times
dizzle88 is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/64578-saints-could-lose-jimmy-graham-non-exclusive-tag.html
Posted By For Type Date Hits
The Latest New Orleans Saints News | SportSpyder This thread Refback 03-01-2014 08:11 PM 10
Saints could lose Jimmy Graham with non-exclusive tag This thread Refback 03-01-2014 07:38 PM 129


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:22 AM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts