Loomis: No deadline for Graham deal

TheOak · 04-10-2014, 01:43 PM

Originally Posted by Utah_Saint

Brandon Gibson

Randell Cobb

Eddie Royal

Wes Welker

Tavon Austin

Jericho Cotchery

all lined up at the wide out position LESS than Graham did.

Jason Avant

Danny Amendola

Santana Moss

lined up wide about the same percentage of the time as Graham.

Wouldn't they all have be designated as Tight Ends?

What you are missing about lee's post is that "slot receiver" is not a Wide Receiver position, it is not a position of any sort, it is a role that multiple positions line up in TE, RB, WR.

Similar to holder for the place kicker... Scat back is not a position either.

Graham didnt line up as a tackle which is a position, he lined up in a role.

The CBA outlines the positions, if a guard plays tackle then that is a position, not a role.

04-10-2014, 01:43 PM	#6
TheOak 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Cypress Tx. Posts: 19,051	Loomis: No deadline for Graham deal Originally Posted by Utah_Saint Brandon Gibson Randell Cobb Eddie Royal Wes Welker Tavon Austin Jericho Cotchery all lined up at the wide out position LESS than Graham did. Jason Avant Danny Amendola Santana Moss lined up wide about the same percentage of the time as Graham. Wouldn't they all have be designated as Tight Ends? What you are missing about lee's post is that "slot receiver" is not a Wide Receiver position, it is not a position of any sort, it is a role that multiple positions line up in TE, RB, WR. Similar to holder for the place kicker... Scat back is not a position either. Graham didnt line up as a tackle which is a position, he lined up in a role. The CBA outlines the positions, if a guard plays tackle then that is a position, not a role.
	Last edited by TheOak; 04-10-2014 at 01:52 PM..

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/65424-loomis-no-deadline-graham-deal.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
Loomis: No deadline for Graham deal	This thread	Refback	04-10-2014 10:15 AM	5