|
View Poll Results: Why didn't the Saints have more success in the Mora years? | |||
Coaching; Had a good enough team to make a serious Super Bowl run | 8 | 21.62% | |
Players; the Saints needed a better QB, WRs or RB, etc? | 25 | 67.57% | |
The Saints just weren't good enough back then? | 6 | 16.22% | |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 37. You may not vote on this poll |
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Jim Finks! The front office was taken from the same group who built the '84 Bears. Finks left the Bears in 1982 before that monster gelled, but it was his handiwork that brought those players together. Finks resigned when the ...
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
07-16-2014, 04:45 PM | #31 |
Site Donor MONTHLY
|
Re: Why didn't the Saints have more success during the Mora years?
Jim Finks!
The front office was taken from the same group who built the '84 Bears. Finks left the Bears in 1982 before that monster gelled, but it was his handiwork that brought those players together. Finks resigned when the organization didn't consult him when they hired Ditka, someone Finks didn't like so much. The Bears were a limp wrist through the 70's until Finks went in and acquired players. Then they ran playoffs for years. His style of team was old school - build a nasty defense and spend your money on monster offensive linemen, and the rest will take care of itself. Although he was the architect of teams, Finks lacked "pizzazz" or magic needed to make a Superbowl winner. Someone like Ditka was able to spark a fire to build one of the more memorable teams in NFL history using Finks talent pool he left with the Bears (yes it takes an insane idiot like Coach Ditka to create an earth shattering miracle). It also took Ditka a short few years to mostly dismantle that team, so it was practically a one hit wonder. Finks was no frills, and so was the Saints offense just like Finks - old school, unimaginative, down and distance, playoff bound but never Superbowl material. |
Last edited by Halo; 07-16-2014 at 04:48 PM.. |
|
Latest Blogs | |
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn
Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey
CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey |
07-16-2014, 05:09 PM | #32 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,254
|
Re: Why didn't the Saints have more success during the Mora years?
Originally Posted by WhoDat!656
Eric Martin and Quinn Early were both good, starting-quality receivers. So was Lonzell Hill for a few years. Floyd Turner and Brett Perriman were good #3 types. In the later years of Mora when Everett was QB, Michael Haynes and Torrance Small were putting up good numbers too. We always had a revolving door of WR's but they were always productive for the most part.
If you could send Brees back in time to those teams I bet the offense wouldn't look much different, with Martin in the Colston role, Early as Lance Moore and Turner as the Henderson/Meachem field-stretcher. We had all the parts on offense then, just not a QB. Now when Ditka took over, that was when we were devoid of talent on offense. |
07-16-2014, 05:35 PM | #33 |
Mmm That Smell!
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Metairie Terrace
Posts: 3,073
|
Re: Why didn't the Saints have more success during the Mora years?
Carl Smith
|
07-16-2014, 10:52 PM | #34 |
Site Donor 2014
|
Re: Why didn't the Saints have more success during the Mora years?
1-Mora was a bit conservative at times.
2-Thus relying on Anderson for the 3pts over and over and so on. 3-You really did not have a QB in Bobby Herbert and backup, Fourcade. LA boys which were most important for fans then to have rather a really strong QB. 4-O-line was ok. 5-YES, D-line was tops and that and Anderson put up points by D-line shutting down the other team and Anderson 3pts again, aain and so on. |
07-17-2014, 04:42 AM | #35 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Newport News, VA
Posts: 1,583
|
Re: Why didn't the Saints have more success during the Mora years?
I remember one game at the start of the 4th 21-21.
Other team 3 TD's Saint's 7 field goals. I remember the announcer mentioning how the Saints got there the other way. |
07-17-2014, 10:25 AM | #36 |
Site Donor 2018
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: lafayette
Posts: 7,753
|
Re: Why didn't the Saints have more success during the Mora years?
Carl smith, carl smith, carl smith and a few prevent defenses when u have one of the defenses ever
Sent from my GT-P1010 using Tapatalk 2 |
07-17-2014, 04:28 PM | #37 |
Deuce
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,894
|
Re: Why didn't the Saints have more success during the Mora years?
...because Mora didn't like Fourcade and gave up on him too early...because Bobby took his ball and stayed home when Johnny was named starter...and when they gave up on John F they went out and mortgaged the farm for a noodle arm QB named Steve Walsh.
|
07-19-2014, 10:32 AM | #38 |
LB Mentallity
|
Re: Why didn't the Saints have more success during the Mora years?
coaching end of story
Mora inherited quarterback Bobby Hebert so that does not hold water Plenty of solid talent in the backfield. Wr were pretty solid. OL was well above average also he gutted the NFL best defensive coaching staff to keep the OC Carl Smith. It was Mora love for Carl Smith that killed the team. I forgot his name for a reason but it has resurfaced here. Mora never did the right thing with his offensive coaching staff. Replace Carl Smith. We always were waiting for those two come out of the closet. that would be the reason we could think of for this love affair to go on I never understood his loyalty to the OC Carl Smith at all. Mora has to thank Bum for building the core of the team that made him a winner. blame rest with Mora. |
"We may have lost the game, but you'll be hurting tomorrow." Doug Atkins
Last edited by hagan714; 07-19-2014 at 10:38 AM.. |
|
07-19-2014, 10:51 AM | #39 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,127
|
Re: Why didn't the Saints have more success during the Mora years?
This is something I could never figure out given that the Ravens won purely off defense and no offense and where built in similar fashion to the Mora Saints teams back then.
But it could of been when some teams win the SB these days, theirs a lack of competition to. Which I believe we are nearing an era right now where any team can win it as Brees, Brady, and Manning get older, hence why teams like Baltimore and Seattle have both won. |
07-20-2014, 05:11 AM | #40 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Metairie
Posts: 1,129
|
Re: Why didn't the Saints have more success during the Mora years?
The Saints were 12-3 one year 92 I think. Unfortunately Moras teams folded in the playoffs. Why didn't Moras teams beat Dallas San Fransisco or Philadelphia in pre salary cap days? Duh? That'd have been like the As winning the World Series. The 49ers had Montana Rice Craig Rathman Taylor Lott Sanders. The Saints had Hilliard Martin Hebert Hill Brenner and of course the Done Patrol. But compared to the 49ers Hall of Fame riddled roster. And don't get me started on the Cowboys in the 90s with Aikman Smith Irving and the best O-line in history.
|
|
|
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/66838-why-didnt-saints-have-more-success-during-mora-years.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
Why didn't the Saints have more success during the Mora years? | This thread | Refback | 07-15-2014 04:12 PM | 19 |