Register All Albums FAQ Community Experience
Go Back   New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints

Film study: Reviewing Saints defense By Mike Triplett

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; My two biggest takeaways after reviewing the tape of the New Orleans Saints' defense: The tackling was just as bad as advertised, but the cornerback play wasn't as glaring a concern as one might expect. The Saints allowed a franchise-record ...

Like Tree9Likes

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-10-2014, 02:30 AM   #1
Threaded by hagan714
LB Mentallity
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 15,870

Blog Entries: 68
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Rating: (0 votes - average)

My two biggest takeaways after reviewing the tape of the New Orleans Saints' defense: The tackling was just as bad as advertised, but the cornerback play wasn't as glaring a concern as one might expect.

The Saints allowed a franchise-record 445 passing yards in a 37-34 overtime loss to the Atlanta Falcons Sunday. But they rarely got burned over the top by big-play threats Julio Jones and Roddy White. The only two times the Saints got beat deep were a 35-yard pass to Devin Hester and a 27-yarder to Jones, both against cornerback Patrick Robinson.

The bad news was that the Saints were repeatedly burned by the underneath stuff, and they didn't get enough pressure on quarterback Matt Ryan. Most of the Falcons' yardage came via those missed tackles, too many big cushions in zone coverage, pick plays and screen plays.

Here are some more observations:

Missed tackles: Yikes. Pro Football Focus credited the Saints with 16 missed tackles -- and many of them were costly.

Film study: Reviewing New Orleans Saints defense - ESPN

Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	fleur.jpg
Views:	0
Size:	8.2 KB
ID:	9808  

Beastmode likes this.

Last edited by Halo; 09-10-2014 at 05:12 PM..
Views: 4038
Old 09-10-2014, 07:16 AM   #2
Site Donor 2014
Truth Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,640
Re: Film study: Reviewing Saints defense By Mike Triplett

Tripp is right
Danno is offline  
Old 09-10-2014, 07:24 AM   #3
10000 POST CLUB
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 10,838
Re: Film study: Reviewing Saints defense By Mike Triplett

Patrick Robinson guesses too much in man coverage, when he guessed wrong he gets completely turned around and about 3 steps away from the receiver leaving him wide open

I really want the guy to do well, but if his technique in coverage doesn't improve this season I think he is gone
dizzle88 is offline  
Old 09-10-2014, 07:50 AM   #4
10000 POST CLUB
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cypress Tx.
Posts: 18,978
Re: Film study: Reviewing Saints defense By Mike Triplett

How could one possible get burned over the top playing 6 miles off the receiver?
TheOak is offline  
Old 09-10-2014, 08:06 AM   #5
Site Donor 2014
Truth Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,640
Re: Film study: Reviewing Saints defense By Mike Triplett

Originally Posted by TheOak View Post
How could one possible get burned over the top playing 6 miles off the receiver?
Because you let the WR get to full speed as you start to turn and run. You've lost the race two steps into it.

You only play that far off in zone, then you expect safety help after the WR leaves your zone.

Reminder: We suck at zone.
Danno is offline  
Old 09-10-2014, 08:09 AM   #6
500th Post
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 921
Re: Film study: Reviewing Saints defense By Mike Triplett

Originally Posted by Danno View Post
Reminder: We suck at zone.
And why Rob Ryan thought it would work when it didn't work for Spags is beyond me.
jeanpierre likes this.
NonieT is offline  
Old 09-10-2014, 08:44 AM   #7
Site Donor 2019
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 3,521
Re: Film study: Reviewing Saints defense By Mike Triplett

Originally Posted by NonieT View Post
And why Rob Ryan thought it would work when it didn't work for Spags is beyond me.
Probably because playing Julio Jones, Roddy White, Harry Douglas and Devin Hester man to man was asking too much so they played a lot of zone.

Luckily, there aren't many receiving corps in the NFL that are that deep.
Utah_Saint is offline  
Old 09-10-2014, 09:04 AM   #8
10000 POST CLUB
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cypress Tx.
Posts: 18,978
Re: Film study: Reviewing Saints defense By Mike Triplett

Originally Posted by NonieT View Post
And why Rob Ryan thought it would work when it didn't work for Spags is beyond me.
Well, that is when that whole insignificant tackling thingy comes into play.

195 yards after the catch.
MarchingOn likes this.
TheOak is offline  
Old 09-10-2014, 09:08 AM   #9
500th Post
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 921
Re: Film study: Reviewing Saints defense By Mike Triplett

Originally Posted by Utah_Saint View Post
Probably because playing Julio Jones, Roddy White, Harry Douglas and Devin Hester man to man was asking too much so they played a lot of zone.

Luckily, there aren't many receiving corps in the NFL that are that deep.
When we we play them again, what's gonna happen? NO MORE ZONE!!!

As someone already said: "We suck at zone."
NonieT is offline  
Old 09-10-2014, 09:17 AM   #10
Site Donor 2019
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 3,521
Re: Film study: Reviewing Saints defense By Mike Triplett

Originally Posted by NonieT View Post
When we we play them again, what's gonna happen? NO MORE ZONE!!!

As someone already said: "We suck at zone."
Yeah, I hope they chalk that up to a failed experiment.
Utah_Saint is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/68022-film-study-reviewing-saints-defense-mike-triplett.html
Posted By For Type Date Hits
Film study: Reviewing Saints defense By Mike Triplett This thread Refback 09-10-2014 06:51 AM 4
The Latest New Orleans Saints News | SportSpyder This thread Refback 09-10-2014 03:39 AM 1


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:06 AM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts