|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by ChrisXVI Look, of course we looked awful today. Yes, the window most definitely looks closed. Who saw something positive today? Argue in other threads... This is for how we build off of what we saw today. SP ...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,850
|
Re: A Thread for the non-Chicken Little's
SP needs to go with Colston. The score was 17-16 at one point and we still refuse to run the ball. It's like the opposite of Les Miles. 50 passes compared to 20 runs is stupid. We are not Baylor or TCU. This is the pros. It's almost like he is strictly trying to get Brees records instead of wins. The young defense did appear to have talent and a bright future.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 13,145
|
Re: A Thread for the non-Chicken Little's
Originally Posted by voodooido
out of curiosity how many yards did we have from those 20 carries?
![]()
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,850
|
Re: A Thread for the non-Chicken Little's
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
failclownHunter
|
Re: A Thread for the non-Chicken Little's
We are missing coaching and heart. Running the ball so much for wasted downs was a mistake. We should have gone to pass to open the run, but never did. D kept us in the game because of bad play calling on offense, but D should have had 1 of 4 turnovers.
This was not a very good OL, and D could not get much pressure. Kicker was great. But realisically the Rams beat the Hawks. Watch that game, because we would have gotten our ass kicked bad. So we are worse than the Rams, because I am not seeing the heart either. I see a bunch of guys showing up for work on sunday, and not looking to win the Lombardy. Saints are now being seen as should wins, for other teams, thats how bad its gotten. |
Saints proved that pigs could fly in 2009.
Now its time for another miracle SuperBowl and go where no pig has gone before. ![]() Last edited by pherein; 09-13-2015 at 08:03 PM.. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 13,145
|
Re: A Thread for the non-Chicken Little's
coudnt help but think if we had spiller today and we hit him on the play that ingram went for 59 yards on he would have been gone.
we get healthy and we have a pretty good team. Cards were 8-1 when Palmer went down last year and finished 11-5. This team is seriously (if healthy) probably SB bound and we hung with them at their stadium. they had injuries to their d too, last year I am talking about |
Last edited by spkb25; 09-13-2015 at 08:20 PM.. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
1000 Posts +
|
Re: A Thread for the non-Chicken Little's
Originally Posted by spkb25
They were 8-1 before Palmer's injury, but it was still mostly on defense. Without Palmer they simply had zero offense with those highschool QB's.![]()
We made them look much better than they are, in my opinion. There was no better example of that than the lack of pass rush against that horrible offensive line they have. I can't really give our D a pass on this one. We didn't score many points, but we held the ball long enough to give them rest. Our offense failed consistently to finish. And I blame it on bad throws, bad drops and bad play-calling. I'm never a happy camper after a loss, but I usually stay off the boards til the next day to cool down. But the things I saw today can't be over-stated, regardless of how irritated I may be. It really was just a weak performance on every level. We'll get better, I think, but we look further off from contention than I originally thought. |
If I had a nickel for every time I heard that, the NFL would fine and suspend me.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 13,145
|
Re: A Thread for the non-Chicken Little's
Originally Posted by burningmetal
HA, so funny how we see things completely different. Last year we provided such a lack of effort I loved our fight. I didn't think we would be this good...![]()
Now everything has to be taken into account with that statement- it means if we continue giving the effort we gave today, Lewis comes back, and our d doesnt play like they did when they let up the first 2 td's. so we'll see, their oline isn't weak, but they had two rookies starting today and we couldnt get there..that does concern me too. we need lewis and swann starting, in my opin. Anyway we will see, but I thought we looked headed in the right direction, but we are definitely not heading to the sb, but i never thought we were. we can compete for the division though with everything i said above being taken into accunt |
Your team stinks
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
1000 Posts +
|
Re: A Thread for the non-Chicken Little's
Originally Posted by spkb25
Yeah I'm holding most of my hope on the return of Lewis, Spiller and maybe (huge maybe) Byrd. I just wonder how much even a healthy secondary will do if we can't get to the quarterback. I don't remember reacting so strongly to the first game of a season, but it was the knowledge coming in of how much trouble they've had protecting Palmer that had me thinking we'd get to him a few times. The end result really changed my outlook, but like you said, we'll see.
![]()
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baton Rouge, LA.
Posts: 1,493
|
Re: A Thread for the non-Chicken Little's
Positive:
Swann Anthony Unger Negatives: D line Safeties ENTIRE OFFENSE GAME PLAN |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 26
|
Re: A Thread for the non-Chicken Little's
Field goal kicking was stellar. This guy is good and he's cheap.
Breaux played well. I'm worried about our shots down the field. We can't dink it every play. |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/74074-thread-non-chicken-littles.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
A Thread for the non-Chicken Little's | This thread | Refback | 09-13-2015 07:35 PM | 5 |