![]() |
Re: Good bad ugly
-The Linebackers are good.
-The young CB's are ballin'. -Spiller looks healthy. -Special teams coverage was good. -Harper looks good. -Lewis and Manhertz have potential. -Kuhn is the FB. -The OLine is not good. -Peat is not good at either G or T. -The reserves are not good. -Allen is a holding machine. -Murphy just can't catch or hold onto the ball. -Coleman is too inconsistent. -Grayson has no touch. Not the QB of the future. -The commentator who said Payton is a master of the clock and timeouts. |
Re: Good bad ugly
How many drops did Coleman have against the Texans???
|
Re: Good bad ugly
Quote:
|
Re: Good bad ugly
Quote:
Nick Toon 2.0 |
Re: Good bad ugly
I saw a team that was flat. Good efforts and poor performances.I've seen some projections from media that I thought were somewhat underrated. I think that they are on the mark after watching this game. We can't run block and still can't rush the passer. These are fundamental aspects of the game. I think our talent level is improved. I always take preseason games with a grain of salt. Good bad and ugly. The third pre season game is always the truest example of a teams state of readiness. Pittsburgh is a good measuring stick. The turnovers are a huge concern.It was obvious that Thomas was held on Brees int.Murphy cost himself a spot with his fumbles. Given what I've seen so far I think that talk of playoffs is nonsense. Improvements of the other teams in our division is going to make our chances slim to none.
|
Re: Good bad ugly
Do we still "Trust In Mickey?"
|
Re: Good bad ugly
Quote:
|
Re: Good bad ugly
Quote:
:rolleyes: |
Re: Good bad ugly
Quote:
|
Re: Good bad ugly
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:25 AM. |
Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com