|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Joe Horn and Jerry Rice have very simular stats over a 4 year period. I think Joe Horn is just as good as Jerry Rice. And I\'ve got STATS to prove it. Don\'t make me bust out my stats. This ...
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-23-2005, 01:25 PM | #31 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,616
|
Attention Horn bashers
Joe Horn and Jerry Rice have very simular stats over a 4 year period. I think Joe Horn is just as good as Jerry Rice.
And I\'ve got STATS to prove it. Don\'t make me bust out my stats. This ridiculous post is brought to the board to combat the popular logic of the Joe Horn LOVERS... [Edited on 23/3/2005 by GumboBC] |
Latest Blogs | |
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn
Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey
CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey |
03-23-2005, 01:53 PM | #32 |
100th Post
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 122
|
Attention Horn bashers
Shadow you misunderstood. I meant lost it as in he\'s lost his mind, not his ability. I mean he\'s crazy for asking for top 3 money. I know he\'s one of the top receivers, just not one of the top 2 or 3 in the league.
I\'m not saying stats are useless in discussion. They are needed to compare players as far as production. But you can\'t base an argument about who\'s a better player on stats alone. For example, Muhsin Muhammad had better numbers than Horn, Moss, T.O., Harrison and every other receiver in the NFL. So by your logic one could assume that Muhammad is the best receiver in the league. And don\'t give me any BS about \"well you can\'t go by just last years stats\". If you want to determine who\'s a better player based on numbers alone then you can\'t make up new rules as you go. Here\'s another example, Marty Booker. A few years ago Marty was putting up great numbers. I guess back then you would call him GREAT because of his numbers. Now what is he? A freaking bum. Was he a great WR? No, but he was the only option in the passing attack so he put up some numbers. But if you go by your logic Marty was a great WR because of his stats. Once again I have proven that stats can be misleading. Numbers should be handled with care. Sometimes if you use them to much they get turned around on you and blow up in your face. |
We are the music makers, And we are the dreamers of dreams
|
|
03-23-2005, 01:58 PM | #33 |
Merces Letifer
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,161
|
Attention Horn bashers
I love you, man.... ...and Stokley is better than Porter |
03-23-2005, 02:21 PM | #34 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,631
|
Attention Horn bashers
|
03-23-2005, 02:23 PM | #35 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,616
|
Attention Horn bashers
WhoDat
Joe Horn is just as good as Jerry Rice. Just look at the damn stats. Don\'t be telling me I\'m a fool for saying it either. LOOK AT THE DAMN STATS. NUFF SAID!! |
03-23-2005, 02:32 PM | #36 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,631
|
Attention Horn bashers
What\'s wrong Billy? Lose the goggle? Run out of Tang? I\'m sure by tomorrow your passion for unbridled and unfounded optimism will return. Fear not, you\'ll be predicting 13-3 in no time!
|
03-23-2005, 02:36 PM | #37 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,616
|
Attention Horn bashers
NUFF SAID! NUFF SAID! NUFF SAID! NUFF SAID! NUFF SAID! |
03-23-2005, 02:44 PM | #38 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 517
|
Attention Horn bashers
hahahaha
|
03-23-2005, 02:48 PM | #39 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,631
|
Attention Horn bashers
Amazingly, this isn\'t much different than how you normally argue.
|
03-23-2005, 02:51 PM | #40 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,616
|
Attention Horn bashers
Why can\'t I use the SAME stats to prove Joe Horn is just as good as Jerry Rice.? |