Register All Albums FAQ Community Experience
Go Back   New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints

Antonio Brown...should we?

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Just kidding. Wouldn't even want him for vet minimum...

Like Tree67Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-07-2019, 11:13 AM   #1
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 6,324
Antonio Brown...should we?

Just kidding. Wouldn't even want him for vet minimum
jnormand likes this.
ScottF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2019, 11:25 AM   #2
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,543
Re: Antonio Brown...should we?

The Panthers!! Two guys pouting on the bench with towels over their heads!!! Purrrrrrrrrrrrfict!!!
vpheughan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2019, 11:26 AM   #3
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hollywood, CA
Posts: 7,601
Blog Entries: 5
Re: Antonio Brown...should we?

actually we should be making phone calls... and see behind the scenes because what is going to happen is that NE is going to step in and sign him.

Whats wrong with a one year deal?
subguy, Crusader and rezburna like this.
Euphoria is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2019, 11:29 AM   #4
100% Blunt
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Saint Gabriel, La
Posts: 2,754
Re: Antonio Brown...should we?

Originally Posted by Euphoria View Post
actually we should be making phone calls... and see behind the scenes because what is going to happen is that NE is going to step in and sign him.

Whats wrong with a one year deal?
Idk if Belichick would even touch this guy with a ten foot pole.
Lord_Saint83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2019, 04:07 PM   #5
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hollywood, CA
Posts: 7,601
Blog Entries: 5
Re: Antonio Brown...should we?

Originally Posted by Lord_Saint83 View Post
Idk if Belichick would even touch this guy with a ten foot pole.
News flash he just signed with NE.
They did the same thing with Moss when Moss was a problem and Hayden... Its ok to take risks it only wins you SB's.
rezburna likes this.
Euphoria is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2019, 04:08 PM   #6
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Kenner, LA
Posts: 7,999
Re: Antonio Brown...should we?

Originally Posted by Euphoria View Post
News flash he just signed with NE.
They did the same thing with Moss when Moss was a problem and Hayden... Its ok to take risks it only wins you SB's.
If your locker room and organization can’t handle a bad boy then it’s not a winning franchise.
rezburna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2019, 05:35 PM   #7
10000 POST CLUB
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bossier City, LA
Posts: 26,489
Re: Antonio Brown...should we?

Originally Posted by rezburna View Post
If your locker room and organization can’t handle a bad boy then it’s not a winning franchise.


Exactly. I’m sure Belichick told him you toe our company line or you’re gone again. He’ll tell it like it is and stand behind it every step of the way. None of this placating the player and the press.
AsylumGuido is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2019, 11:34 AM   #8
Site Donor 2018
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: lafayette
Posts: 7,753
Re: Antonio Brown...should we?

Let NE have that clown. I believe he wanted out of raiders trash team when he saw what it really looked like. So stomp ur feet and cause crap to get out and he succeeded. He with go to Boston and behave. That is all.
jnormand likes this.
st thomas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2019, 11:35 AM   #9
Donated Plasma
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 18,556
Blog Entries: 5
Re: Antonio Brown...should we?

He'd call Loomis a 'cracker' one time, and one time only, and that'd be that.

It's almost like the guy never wanted to be in Oakland and he was trying to get himself fired.
jnormand likes this.
saintfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2019, 11:39 AM   #10
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,331
Re: Antonio Brown...should we?

Originally Posted by saintfan View Post
He'd call Loomis a 'cracker' one time, and one time only, and that'd be that.

It's almost like the guy never wanted to be in Oakland and he was trying to get himself fired.
I actually disagree with that. Loomis tries hard to remain neutral and let the locker room dynamics do their own thing. Mayock inserted himself into an issue that seemed like was already solved. Brown was was ready to play with a new helmet. Gruden was fine with him. Mayock is a douchebag. I don't like Brown, but this isn't entirely his fault imo. If the coach wanted the guy gone, then he should be gone. This was more about Mayock wanting to validate his authority or some ****.
rezburna likes this.
hitta is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:39 AM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts