Al Riveron explains why there was no OPI foul in final play of Saints-Vikings

WhoDat!656 · 01-05-2020, 05:58 PM

https://saintswire.usatoday.com/2020...-nfl-playoffs/

RefsRobbedUs · 01-05-2020, 06:00 PM

A straight extended arm to the defenders chest isn't a foul? Would two arms be a foul?
Hilarious

foreverfan · 01-05-2020, 06:07 PM

Total push off... When is the draft?

WillMacKenzie · 01-05-2020, 06:10 PM

Nearly knocking PJ Williams off his feet isn’t a foul — he must be thrown cleanly to the turf

saintfan · 01-05-2020, 06:11 PM

It was a deliberate non-call because Roger. It's not even up for debate.

Rsanders24 · 01-05-2020, 06:17 PM

There is too much subjectivity in the penalties. For years the league has said that they look for full extension of the arm. Well that was a clear extension and by a player with 6 inches of height advantage.

K Major · 01-05-2020, 06:21 PM

Obvious push off that should have been called. Even Dungy and Harrison agreed.

But this game was lost well before that play.

saintfan · 01-05-2020, 06:22 PM

Originally Posted by K Major

Obvious push off that should have been called. Even Dungy and Harrison agreed.

But this game was lost well before that play.

Yep. CLEARLY PI. The game wasn't lost. Once again the refs interfered to tip the scales. Roger has to go. Let's ban Roger and Dizzle and restore order to the universe.

neugey · 01-05-2020, 06:26 PM

Wasn't that flagrant of a push-off. Small potatoes compared to what Michael Irvin used to get away with. Don't want to see us focused on the league, we have draft and scout well and reload and put it behind us.

Vrillon82 · 01-05-2020, 06:27 PM

It was lost at the coin flip into OT. Viking fans can’t cry about not getting the ball in 2009 now.

01-05-2020, 05:58 PM	#1
WhoDat!656 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: Shreveport,Louisiana Posts: 16,062	Al Riveron explains why there was no OPI foul in final play of Saints-Vikings https://saintswire.usatoday.com/2020...-nfl-playoffs/

01-05-2020, 06:00 PM	#2
RefsRobbedUs 500th Post Join Date: Jan 2019 Posts: 659	Re: Al Riveron explains why there was no OPI foul in final play of Saints-Vikings A straight extended arm to the defenders chest isn't a foul? Would two arms be a foul? Hilarious OldMaid likes this.
RefsRobbedUs 500th Post Join Date: Jan 2019 Posts: 659

01-05-2020, 06:07 PM	#3
foreverfan 12,000 BS Posts Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Metairie, LA Posts: 13,457 Blog Entries: 5	Re: Al Riveron explains why there was no OPI foul in final play of Saints-Vikings Total push off... When is the draft? Rueben Mayes likes this.

01-05-2020, 06:10 PM	#4
WillMacKenzie 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 1,627	Re: Al Riveron explains why there was no OPI foul in final play of Saints-Vikings Nearly knocking PJ Williams off his feet isn’t a foul — he must be thrown cleanly to the turf OldMaid and Rueben Mayes like this.

01-05-2020, 06:11 PM	#5
saintfan Donated Plasma Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: San Francisco, CA Posts: 18,556 Blog Entries: 5	Re: Al Riveron explains why there was no OPI foul in final play of Saints-Vikings It was a deliberate non-call because Roger. It's not even up for debate. SmashMouth, OldMaid, WhoDat!656 and 1 others like this.

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

01-05-2020, 06:17 PM	#6
Rsanders24 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Baton Rouge, LA. Posts: 1,482	Re: Al Riveron explains why there was no OPI foul in final play of Saints-Vikings There is too much subjectivity in the penalties. For years the league has said that they look for full extension of the arm. Well that was a clear extension and by a player with 6 inches of height advantage. OldMaid likes this.

01-05-2020, 06:21 PM	#7
K Major Site Donor 2019 Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: Bedford, TX Posts: 24,622 Blog Entries: 3	Re: Al Riveron explains why there was no OPI foul in final play of Saints-Vikings Obvious push off that should have been called. Even Dungy and Harrison agreed. But this game was lost well before that play. SaintFanQ, saintsfan1976, SmashMouth and 3 others like this.

01-05-2020, 06:22 PM	#8
saintfan Donated Plasma Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: San Francisco, CA Posts: 18,556 Blog Entries: 5	Re: Al Riveron explains why there was no OPI foul in final play of Saints-Vikings Originally Posted by K Major Obvious push off that should have been called. Even Dungy and Harrison agreed. But this game was lost well before that play. Yep. CLEARLY PI. The game wasn't lost. Once again the refs interfered to tip the scales. Roger has to go. Let's ban Roger and Dizzle and restore order to the universe.

01-05-2020, 06:26 PM	#9
neugey Hu Dat! Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 6,715 Blog Entries: 13	Re: Al Riveron explains why there was no OPI foul in final play of Saints-Vikings Wasn't that flagrant of a push-off. Small potatoes compared to what Michael Irvin used to get away with. Don't want to see us focused on the league, we have draft and scout well and reload and put it behind us. SaintFanQ, saintsfan1976, Rueben Mayes and 1 others like this.

01-05-2020, 06:27 PM	#10
Vrillon82 1000 Posts + Join Date: Aug 2012 Posts: 1,127	Re: Al Riveron explains why there was no OPI foul in final play of Saints-Vikings It was lost at the coin flip into OT. Viking fans can’t cry about not getting the ball in 2009 now. OldMaid and Rell&Gold like this.
Vrillon82 1000 Posts + Join Date: Aug 2012 Posts: 1,127