Saints Cut G Larry Warford

jeanpierre · 05-08-2020, 04:30 PM

Originally Posted by rezburna

I don’t understand choosing Peat over Warford. This is odd.

Warford was healthy and still sucked balls; got by while Ramczyk and McCoy carried the load; Peat probably earned some cred playing hurt like he had...

...And no, not saying I'd be happy with standing pat with Peat either - who'd better show up at camp and take Sean Payton to heart "in the best shape of your lives..."

blackangold · 05-08-2020, 04:51 PM

Originally Posted by jeanpierre

Warford was healthy and still sucked balls; got by while Ramczyk and McCoy carried the load; Peat probably earned some cred playing hurt like he had...

...And no, not saying I'd be happy with standing pat with Peat either - who'd better show up at camp and take Sean Payton to heart "in the best shape of your lives..."

Guy made the pro bowl and rated better than Peat by every site that maintains rating stats. Yet we pay Peat a boat load for being below average...

I don’t mind the Warford move, just don’t get the deal with peat.

rezburna · 05-08-2020, 05:42 PM

Originally Posted by jeanpierre

Warford was healthy and still sucked balls; got by while Ramczyk and McCoy carried the load; Peat probably earned some cred playing hurt like he had...

...And no, not saying I'd be happy with standing pat with Peat either - who'd better show up at camp and take Sean Payton to heart "in the best shape of your lives..."

Warford graded out decent though. Definitely overrated, but consistent average. I think it was personal.

lee909 · 05-08-2020, 05:48 PM

Originally Posted by rezburna

Warford graded out decent though. Definitely overrated, but consistent average. I think it was personal.

Turned up heavy last year didn't he. I think the opinion is he is on the slide and not as invested. The cap money was needed too.

Also the Brees fumble that lost the game was partly on him. Ramczyk gets beat but has nowhere to go with Warford being mauled backwards. Think that play was when it was decided. Think they just held on to make sure they got a player in the draft hence the bonus payment

voodooido · 05-08-2020, 05:51 PM

Originally Posted by rezburna

Warford graded out decent though. Definitely overrated, but consistent average. I think it was personal.

Well when you can save 7.75 million and have no drop off in production you tend to lean toward that.

ChrisXVI · 05-08-2020, 04:39 PM

Originally Posted by rezburna

I don’t understand choosing Peat over Warford. This is odd.

Sums it up...

iceshack149, saintsfan1976, SmashMouth and 1 others like this.

lee909 · 05-08-2020, 05:45 PM

Originally Posted by rezburna

I don’t understand choosing Peat over Warford. This is odd.

3 years younger and can slide out to tackle in a emergency.

Peats get out is in 3 years. It's not as bad as people thinking imho. Overpaid. Probably but after 3 years it's a 9ml saving and 5ml Dead money hit if he doesn't step up.

RefsRobbedUs · 05-08-2020, 04:35 PM

We probably will be in the same boat with Peat in a few years

jeanpierre · 05-08-2020, 05:45 PM

Originally Posted by RefsRobbedUs

We probably will be in the same boat with Peat in a few years

Nope, Peat will be gone next year, especially if we find a good swing tackle (Peat's Plus value) among the new kids...

lee909 · 05-08-2020, 05:53 PM

Originally Posted by jeanpierre

Nope, Peat will be gone next year, especially if we find a good swing tackle (Peat's Plus value) among the new kids...

The dead cap is 19ml next season. He's not going anywhere for at least 2(nearly 8ml season after) probably 3 years.

05-08-2020, 04:30 PM	#1
jeanpierre Site Donor 2018 Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Thibodaux Posts: 43,543 Blog Entries: 39	Re: Saints Cut G Larry Warford Originally Posted by rezburna I don’t understand choosing Peat over Warford. This is odd. Warford was healthy and still sucked balls; got by while Ramczyk and McCoy carried the load; Peat probably earned some cred playing hurt like he had... ...And no, not saying I'd be happy with standing pat with Peat either - who'd better show up at camp and take Sean Payton to heart "in the best shape of your lives..." saintfan and SmashMouth like this.

05-08-2020, 04:51 PM	#2
blackangold 1000 Posts + Join Date: Aug 2011 Posts: 3,422	Re: Saints Cut G Larry Warford Originally Posted by jeanpierre Warford was healthy and still sucked balls; got by while Ramczyk and McCoy carried the load; Peat probably earned some cred playing hurt like he had... ...And no, not saying I'd be happy with standing pat with Peat either - who'd better show up at camp and take Sean Payton to heart "in the best shape of your lives..." Guy made the pro bowl and rated better than Peat by every site that maintains rating stats. Yet we pay Peat a boat load for being below average... I don’t mind the Warford move, just don’t get the deal with peat.

05-08-2020, 05:42 PM	#3
rezburna 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Feb 2013 Location: Kenner, LA Posts: 7,999	Re: Saints Cut G Larry Warford Originally Posted by jeanpierre Warford was healthy and still sucked balls; got by while Ramczyk and McCoy carried the load; Peat probably earned some cred playing hurt like he had... ...And no, not saying I'd be happy with standing pat with Peat either - who'd better show up at camp and take Sean Payton to heart "in the best shape of your lives..." Warford graded out decent though. Definitely overrated, but consistent average. I think it was personal.

05-08-2020, 05:48 PM	#4
lee909 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: Watford England Posts: 8,855 Blog Entries: 1	Re: Saints Cut G Larry Warford Originally Posted by rezburna Warford graded out decent though. Definitely overrated, but consistent average. I think it was personal. Turned up heavy last year didn't he. I think the opinion is he is on the slide and not as invested. The cap money was needed too. Also the Brees fumble that lost the game was partly on him. Ramczyk gets beat but has nowhere to go with Warford being mauled backwards. Think that play was when it was decided. Think they just held on to make sure they got a player in the draft hence the bonus payment SmashMouth likes this.

05-08-2020, 05:51 PM	#5
voodooido 1000 Posts + Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 2,819	Re: Saints Cut G Larry Warford Originally Posted by rezburna Warford graded out decent though. Definitely overrated, but consistent average. I think it was personal. Well when you can save 7.75 million and have no drop off in production you tend to lean toward that. Rugby Saint II likes this.
voodooido 1000 Posts + Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 2,819

05-08-2020, 04:39 PM	#6
ChrisXVI 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: Madison, WI Posts: 11,482	Re: Saints Cut G Larry Warford Originally Posted by rezburna I don’t understand choosing Peat over Warford. This is odd. Sums it up... Twitter iceshack149, saintsfan1976, SmashMouth and 1 others like this.

05-08-2020, 05:45 PM	#7
lee909 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: Watford England Posts: 8,855 Blog Entries: 1	Re: Saints Cut G Larry Warford Originally Posted by rezburna I don’t understand choosing Peat over Warford. This is odd. 3 years younger and can slide out to tackle in a emergency. Peats get out is in 3 years. It's not as bad as people thinking imho. Overpaid. Probably but after 3 years it's a 9ml saving and 5ml Dead money hit if he doesn't step up.

05-08-2020, 04:35 PM	#8
RefsRobbedUs 500th Post Join Date: Jan 2019 Posts: 659	Re: Saints Cut G Larry Warford We probably will be in the same boat with Peat in a few years
RefsRobbedUs 500th Post Join Date: Jan 2019 Posts: 659

05-08-2020, 05:53 PM	#10
lee909 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: Watford England Posts: 8,855 Blog Entries: 1	Re: Saints Cut G Larry Warford Originally Posted by jeanpierre Nope, Peat will be gone next year, especially if we find a good swing tackle (Peat's Plus value) among the new kids... The dead cap is 19ml next season. He's not going anywhere for at least 2(nearly 8ml season after) probably 3 years.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode