|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by TheOak It is difficult to tell if you are that myopic or if you think we are? That argument might fly on other boards but not here buddy lol. QBs have feet to go along with the ...
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#14 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bossier City, LA
Posts: 26,472
|
Re: Question about Saints losing to backup/rookie Qb’s
Originally Posted by TheOak
If our offense wasn't so anemic we could have won the game easily and Hurts' running would have simply been a side note. His passing attack was pedestrian, managing only a 83.6 rating. For comparison, Hill had a 102.0 rating. Hurts' "bad throw" rate was 23.1% (Hill's was 18.9%). His completed air yards per attempt was a miniscule 1.6 yards. However, they did have 120 yards after catch. We had only 113 on eleven more completions. Those numbers are not indicative of having "lit someone up".![]()
Our playing from behind the entire game put a ton of pressure on the defense. It created over-pursuit (we blitzed 12 times!) which resulted in those big plays on the ground. 40% of Hurts' rushing yards came on four scrambles. He had 14 other carries for the remainder. By the way, Miles Sanders had over 71% of his 115 yards on one play. He only averaged 2.4 YPC on the other 13. Hill's (and Payton's) inability to generate any offense in the first half is what allowed the Eagles' ground game to shred our tiring defense early on. Mistakes just compounded the problem. A few big plays, a bad interception, a bad fumble, and two missed FG's is what lit us up. |
“The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty.” — Winston Churchill
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|