Observations from the Saints win vs Seahawks

papz · 10-09-2022, 05:03 PM

Originally Posted by Saintsfan4ever

wait, how can this be? All the sports media experts and all the armchair coaching experts said Taysom Hill was not a QB. Yet he took about 10 snaps at QB today and single-handedly won the game. I'm so confused. Com' on sports talent experts, help me out here. Help me make sense of this strange anomaly.

And that is how you use him effectively. He’s not a starting quarterback. He’s a gadget player that’s effective when used properly.

Saintsfan4ever · 10-09-2022, 07:48 PM

Originally Posted by papz

And that is how you use him effectively. He’s not a starting quarterback. He’s a gadget player that’s effective when used properly.

I respect your opinion.
However, I'm of the opinion that he can be a starting QB if used properly, not Pete's vanilla play calling, but a dynamic offense designed for Taysom's strengths & run-threat.
The dude trained to be a TE this season and so far he's been our most effective QB, and still gets labeled as a gadget?... ok, whatever.

Rell&Gold · 10-13-2022, 04:21 PM

Originally Posted by Saintsfan4ever

I respect your opinion.
However, I'm of the opinion that he can be a starting QB if used properly, not Pete's vanilla play calling, but a dynamic offense designed for Taysom's strengths & run-threat.
The dude trained to be a TE this season and so far he's been our most effective QB, and still gets labeled as a gadget?... ok, whatever.

Andy has been the most effective QB. Taysom was Taysom Hill AK Olave did what they do as well as Trequan.

Boston Saint · 10-13-2022, 04:26 PM

Originally Posted by Rell&Gold

Andy has been the most effective QB. Taysom was Taysom Hill AK Olave did what they do as well as Trequan.

Even if an effective, lasting offense could be designed and implemented for Hill I don’t think he’d stay healthy enough to run it. He can be feature for 1/3 of the game, but won’t last full time under center.

Crusader · 10-09-2022, 11:36 PM

Originally Posted by papz

And that is how you use him effectively. He’s not a starting quarterback. He’s a gadget player that’s effective when used properly.

Agreed! And they finally let him throw one which is a must too keep the defences guessing when he is in.

10-09-2022, 05:03 PM	#1
papz Problem? Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: New Orleans Posts: 11,793	Re: Observations from the Saints win vs Seahawks Originally Posted by Saintsfan4ever wait, how can this be? All the sports media experts and all the armchair coaching experts said Taysom Hill was not a QB. Yet he took about 10 snaps at QB today and single-handedly won the game. I'm so confused. Com' on sports talent experts, help me out here. Help me make sense of this strange anomaly. And that is how you use him effectively. He’s not a starting quarterback. He’s a gadget player that’s effective when used properly. iceshack149, Rsanders24, Crusader and 5 others like this.

10-09-2022, 07:48 PM	#2
Saintsfan4ever 500th Post Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Moss Point, MS Posts: 612 Blog Entries: 1	Re: Observations from the Saints win vs Seahawks Originally Posted by papz And that is how you use him effectively. He’s not a starting quarterback. He’s a gadget player that’s effective when used properly. I respect your opinion. However, I'm of the opinion that he can be a starting QB if used properly, not Pete's vanilla play calling, but a dynamic offense designed for Taysom's strengths & run-threat. The dude trained to be a TE this season and so far he's been our most effective QB, and still gets labeled as a gadget?... ok, whatever. SmashMouth and Thirty3 like this.

10-13-2022, 04:21 PM	#3
Rell&Gold 1000 Posts + Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: Washington, D.C Posts: 2,891	Re: Observations from the Saints win vs Seahawks Originally Posted by Saintsfan4ever I respect your opinion. However, I'm of the opinion that he can be a starting QB if used properly, not Pete's vanilla play calling, but a dynamic offense designed for Taysom's strengths & run-threat. The dude trained to be a TE this season and so far he's been our most effective QB, and still gets labeled as a gadget?... ok, whatever. Andy has been the most effective QB. Taysom was Taysom Hill AK Olave did what they do as well as Trequan.

10-13-2022, 04:26 PM	#4
Boston Saint 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Nov 2020 Location: Massachusetts Posts: 5,137	Re: Observations from the Saints win vs Seahawks Originally Posted by Rell&Gold Andy has been the most effective QB. Taysom was Taysom Hill AK Olave did what they do as well as Trequan. Even if an effective, lasting offense could be designed and implemented for Hill I don’t think he’d stay healthy enough to run it. He can be feature for 1/3 of the game, but won’t last full time under center. Rugby Saint II likes this.

10-09-2022, 11:36 PM	#5
Crusader Resident Swede Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Märsta, Sweden Posts: 8,045	Re: Observations from the Saints win vs Seahawks Originally Posted by papz And that is how you use him effectively. He’s not a starting quarterback. He’s a gadget player that’s effective when used properly. Agreed! And they finally let him throw one which is a must too keep the defences guessing when he is in.