|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by papz And that is how you use him effectively. He’s not a starting quarterback. He’s a gadget player that’s effective when used properly. I respect your opinion. However, I'm of the opinion that he can be a ...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
500th Post
|
Re: Observations from the Saints win vs Seahawks
Originally Posted by papz
I respect your opinion.![]()
However, I'm of the opinion that he can be a starting QB if used properly, not Pete's vanilla play calling, but a dynamic offense designed for Taysom's strengths & run-threat. The dude trained to be a TE this season and so far he's been our most effective QB, and still gets labeled as a gadget?... ok, whatever. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Washington, D.C
Posts: 2,891
|
Re: Observations from the Saints win vs Seahawks
Originally Posted by Saintsfan4ever
Andy has been the most effective QB. Taysom was Taysom Hill AK Olave did what they do as well as Trequan.
![]()
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 5,137
|
Re: Observations from the Saints win vs Seahawks
Even if an effective, lasting offense could be designed and implemented for Hill I don’t think he’d stay healthy enough to run it. He can be feature for 1/3 of the game, but won’t last full time under center.
|
![]() |
![]() |