|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by BakoSaint When you go $80 million over the cap or whatever going into every season you often can’t afford to reward great play with a respectable offer or take the short term cap hit to cut underperformers. ...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bossier City, LA
Posts: 26,622
|
Re: Saints set to have first losing season since 2016; so, what went wrong?
Originally Posted by BakoSaint
They aren't going over the cap. They are storing it in easily convertible contract structures. It's there and just as tangible as any other team's caps.
![]()
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 2,385
|
Re: Saints set to have first losing season since 2016; so, what went wrong?
Originally Posted by AsylumGuido
The way its stored is such that whenever a star underperforms, we can never cut them, because the cap hit is always $20 million or more, and then in a couple years when its supposed to be the affordable year to finally part ways, the cap hit is still $20 million or more because the contract has been restructured twice in two years. ![]()
I get that the money is tangible. If it wasn’t tangible, Andrus Peat could not buy $15 million a year of twinkies and little debbie with it. I get thats its stores in easily convertible structures, much of it in lipids in Peats stomach. I get that its easily convertible, we can convert Michael Thomas to any position and he will be just as effective at long snapper or defensive tackle because he won’t see the fiekd there either. But the one conversion we cant do is converting cutting expensive players like Thomas into cap savings in the near term, because we are carrying bentley loans on pinto players with this wonderful system dreamed up by an ego mad accountant with no football iq. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|