BakoSaint |
02-25-2023 11:13 AM |
Re: Official 2023 OFFSEASON Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmashMouth
(Post 970304)
|
I don't think Underhill's comment is the whole truth. I think its more accurate to say you can keep pushing money forward as long as you keep the player the money is attached to on the roster. To keep them on the roster indefinitely, you do need to add money, as they require base salaries and rarely except veteran minimum numbers long term if they have been paid much more before. When they leave the roster, all that money comes due for that league year or split 50/50 with the next league year. So if humans did not age, it would be a great strategy. But when you are one of the oldest NFL rosters and you are talking about restructuring contracts to push money far out into the future for your oldest players, and you start every league year the most over the cap in the league, it becomes a big problem. I am not confident that Andrus Peat, Taysom Hill, Tyrann Mathieu, or even Cameron Jordan or Demario Davis will be productive players in their 40's or especially 50's. If we wanted to blow up the cap, it would have been smarter to do it during the latter years of Drew's prime to add high dollar free agent oline depth, TE, corners, etc. But Loomis did not need rings to keep his job, he just needed 7-10 or 9-7 or whatever, so we didn't. Now we are blowing up the cap to win 7, 8, 9 games because Loomis does not care about rings, he cares about minimum standards for job security.
|