![]() |
Re: Reasons To Be Positive
Quote:
|
Re: Reasons To Be Positive
Quote:
You guys are so blind with hate for the current regime you are not even making sense anymore. SFIAH” If NOT WINNING the abysmal NFC SOUTH last year is being equated to having a winning season, “blind with love” is as serious an affliction as blinded by hate. |
Re: Reasons To Be Positive
Quote:
“hasn’t quickly happened again” … since 2010. That’s FOURTEEN YEARS. But then again, the above quote is coming from a guy who is quoted as saying, “Winning championships is not the goal”… |
Re: Reasons To Be Positive
Quote:
The bottom line is that you a disruptive here. There cannot be a single solitary post about anything going on with the Saints without you coming on and crapping all over it because you are pissed. So, instead of getting what you want, which is for everyone to be pissed with the Saints administration, all you get is everyone being pissed with you. We are not going to redirect our anger at how you treat this site. You are causing it because you won't shut up, and you won't leave. So, my only frustration is with you personally. I really don't care if you are pissed or not. And dealing with you from now on is calling you out on every post you make until you, personally, outline how the Saints are going to meet your vision. You're not going to be able to come here, spew your hatred, and then hide you hands behind "It's not my job to figure it out. I'm pissed and somebody needs to fix it." So, until you can give a set of concrete steps that the organization needs to take to fix this to your satisfaction with specific personnel to get the job done, I will keep asking the question. Who replaces the people you want gone? Name names. Explain their vision. Show how that vision gets it done. There are a couple of teams recently that have done what you want. The 49ers brought in John Lynch and Kyle Shannahan. Or the Detroit Lions bringing in Brad Holmes and Dan Campbell. Both have made progress. But there are zero championships between them since the Saints won in 2009. The inept front office of the Saints clearly cannot make the moves you want to get the championship you are so desperate for. So, help them out and outline exactly who nees to get hired to get this done. You're not just a fan, you are a complainer. You can see the problem. You complain about the problem. So, you need to fix the problem. Take all the time you need. I'll wait. SFIAH |
Re: Reasons To Be Positive
Quote:
Not "blind with love". Just using the factual definition of a winning season. And that applies to the 2023 Saints. SFIAH |
Re: Reasons To Be Positive
Quote:
If my complaining bothers you more than us not even being able to win the NFC SOUTH, you best set me to IGNORE. It worked wonders for Quido. 😜 |
Re: Reasons To Be Positive
Quote:
And you well know that setting you to ignore is a complete waste of time. Every time anyone posts here, you follow it up. And someone is going to quote you. You are everywhere and that's the problem. I gave you a suggestion a while ago. Have one single hateraid/fire allen/loomis thread where you can complain to your heart's content and anyone who truly wants to ignore you can simply not read the thread. Of course you rejected the idea because your objective is to inflict maximum damage upon every user of this site because the Saints can't satisfy you. BTW note that I identified a problem and proposed a solution, which is more than you have ever attempted. The name of this thread is "Reasons to be positive." You have exactly zero positive thoughts about the Saints as currently constructed. And yet, here you are. And that's because you don't want anyone anywhere on this site to say anything other than the Saints are terrible and Allen needs to be fired. And that's now why me doing me is following up after you. You've identified the problem. Now fix it. Who do you put in these positions so that the Saints can be the team you want them to be? A list of candidates for GM/HC/Owner/President of Football operations/QB/OC and DC would be a good start. Still waiting on that list. And I'm not taking your lame excuse that you are just a fan and fixing it isn't your problem. I'm not going into Training Camp, Preseason, and the Regular Season for another year with these truckfulls of horse manure from you in every thread. So, you just don't get to do you here anymore unchecked. I want to have civil conversations here about the team I follow with people who at least hope that the team can make some progress this year. You are an impediment to that. So, add that to your list of things you need to fix. SFIAH |
Re: Reasons To Be Positive
Quote:
|
Re: Reasons To Be Positive
Quote:
That isn't Kumbaya. That's reality. Whether I can deal with another year of Dennis Allen on the sidelines is irrelevant. Dennis Allen is going to be the head coach of the Saints for 2024. He is going to be on the sidelines. I think you misunderstand where I'm coming from. I'm not saying that your complaints are not valid. If the goal is to field a squad that has a realistic chance of winning a championship in it's current form, the Saints fall significantly short of that goal. And you are probably right that a change in leadership at multiple levels is likely necessary for that to be accomplished. But none of those changes are going to happen now. The cake for 2024 is baked. If you don't like, at this point all you can do is choose not to eat it. I'm not asking you not to be angry. I'm not asking you not to complain. All I'm asking is that you put all that vitriol in a single spot on this forum so that the rest of us who have in fact come to the acceptance phase of whatever the 2024 Saints are going to be can at least talk about it. But as I already said, that's not your objective. Your objective is to make everyone else as angry with the Saints as you are by screaming at anyone who dares to say anything about the current construction of the team other than it needs to be blown up. Guess what? Talking about this team, in it's current form, is the entire purpose of this site. Which means that every post, every thread is a target for you. That doesn't work. And so, since you're going to complain, I'm just going to keep asking you how do you fix it. Who do you get in here after you've blown up the team? It's the only constructive conversation I can have with you, so I will have that. There are at least 6 leadership positions in the Saints organization that you want changed. Pick any one of them at start discussing who can fill those positions and what changes they should make. Since it isn't reality, you are free to speculate. There are a lot of football people out in the world. Talk about how some of those football people can make the Saints better instead of just complaining that the current football people in place are not good enough. SFIAH |
Re: Reasons To Be Positive
Good people,
I've been spending so much time dealing with Sinner, that I have not posted anything about this thread. Here are my Reasons to be positive: 1. The Saints No fly Zone secondary is back in full effect. The team is smart to continue to reload in this area. 2. The tackle position has been upgraded. It'll be interesting to see how KK's scheme functions with this O-line. 3. TH7 seems poised to be the Ultimate Weapon in this new offense. I hope that we see him on the field a lot more than in Carmichael's scattered scheme. 4. While the first 6 games are front loaded with the Cowgirls, Eagles, and Chiefs, it also has 3 division games which if the Saints can dominate like they did the last 3 division games of last season, would put them in a good position with a much lighter 11 games on the backend. SFIAH |
Re: Reasons To Be Positive
Quote:
|
Re: Reasons To Be Positive
Quote:
It will make your B&G life better because he is just Troll looking for opportunity to add “clicks/posts” with his repeated passive aggressive positions. A little bit of self preservation goes a long way SFIAH. |
Re: Reasons To Be Positive
Quote:
🙏🏻 |
Re: Reasons To Be Positive
If I'm ranking my positives, highest to lowest (but still positive)
1. Kubiak 2. Carr improvement (end of season + new OC) 3. Secondary 4. Veteran starters 5. Potential of O Line 6. Potential of D Line |
Re: Reasons To Be Positive
My reason to be positive about this season is that it's a new year. It's that simple. I don't have any expectations to be honest so I'm hoping to be pleasantly surprised. Nothing has changed in regards to having the talent to here to win games. Hopefully we can remain relatively healthy and make something happen.
|
Re: Reasons To Be Positive
Quote:
Your complaining is unproductive because absolutely nothing comes of it. At least make it productive by telling us how the Saints turn this around to your satisfaction. Who out there is our Brad Veach and Andy Reid. What can a new GM do that Loomis isn't doing now, which is obviously keeping Dennis Allen instead of getting rid of him and bringing someone else in. Who is that someone else? Look at the 2024 coaching class. Anyone there you would have replaced Allen for? Who would have a good fit here. My brother wanted Jim Harbaugh in the worst way. Here a list of 2025 HC prospects. Can any of them turn the franchise around in your mind? Ben Johnson, Lions OC. Pete Carroll, former Seahawks HC. ... Ejiro Evero, Panthers DC. ... Aaron Glenn, Lions DC. ... Shane Waldron, Bears OC. ... Brian Flores, Vikings DC. ... Frank Smith, Dolphins OC. ... Al Harris, Cowboys assistant. ... Mike Vrable Bill Belechik BTW this isn't just for Sinner. Everyone is free to join in. SFIAH |
Re: Reasons To Be Positive
Quote:
As for the o-line, I'm expecting Jordan to be back to more like his old self. He struggled with that bum ankle all season long. That affected his play far more than an additional trip around the sun. |
Re: Reasons To Be Positive
Quote:
Every season hangs on a bunch of ifs. Health first and foremost. The Saints defense generally keeps them in games. What will be interesting is if the offense can deliver when the chips are down. SFIAH |
Re: Reasons To Be Positive
Quote:
|
Re: Reasons To Be Positive
Quote:
So, it's time to hold him accountable. He complains about what he doesn't like. He screams that the Saints needs a complete reorganization from the owner down. But he has no clue as to how to actually do that. And there are other NFL organizations (Panthers, Commanders) that have gone that route which are now in shambles. I do apologize because I know this is annoying as hell. But this season will be even worse if he goes unchallenged on this because it'll just be all complaints, no potential solutions, and in each and every thread that is posted. It has got to stop. This is now year 3. It has got to stop. SFIAH |
Re: Reasons To Be Positive
Quote:
|
Re: Reasons To Be Positive
Quote:
For example, it's clear that the Saints transition from Sean Payton was to keep the boat steady, transition without drowning after Brees' exit, and continue to be playoff level contenders in the NFL. Allen has so far fallen short of that vision. Of course, some fans believe it's an unmitigated disaster being 3 years out of the playoffs. Many want Allen changed out. Some want Loomis replaced. If this happens, then what vision will a replacement bring that will elevate the team beyond it's current status. Our friend Sinner has no clue what that is. Just giving him some choices so that he can tell us how some of these folks could possibly fill the vision that he really really wants. There's no need for you or I to entertain this. We can actually talk about Allen, Kubiak, and the 60 or so players that have a realistic chance of making the 2024 squad. We can talk about the fact that in the first 6 games if the Saints can win the 3 division games plus at least one against Dallas, Philly, or KC, that would essentially be in control of the division after 6 games with a much lighter schedule for the last 11. We can talk about how a new offensive scheme can maximize the talent that we have. Of course in Sinners eyes any or all of these makes you a rose colored glasses, Kumbaya, mediocre accepting wannabe Saints fan. So, Sinner can't talk about any of that. He is blocked by the fact that Loomis is still the GM and Allen is still the head coach and that there is no chance of that changing before January 2025. So, prospects for replacement is something he can focus on. So, let him have at it. SFIAH |
Re: Reasons To Be Positive
Quote:
SFIAH |
Re: Reasons To Be Positive
Quote:
If you want to shut me up, then answer my question. Who do you replace Allen, Loomis, or even Mrs. Benson in this organization with in order to have the team that you want? You are going to keep complaining that the Saints need to change. I am going to keep asking you what those changes need to be. That's our new reality. Get used to it. SFIAH |
Re: Reasons To Be Positive
Quote:
I am not asking you to let me complain in peace. There will not be peace until my Saints put a championship team on the field. |
Re: Reasons To Be Positive
Quote:
:dead: I wish there was some way to mute the loser completely. |
Re: Reasons To Be Positive
Quote:
|
Re: Reasons To Be Positive
Quote:
SFIAH |
Re: Reasons To Be Positive
Quote:
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/78/1e...2726bf3873.jpg |
Re: Reasons To Be Positive
Quote:
|
Re: Reasons To Be Positive
Quote:
I don’t answer to you. The Saints do… or don’t. We’ll see. |
Re: Reasons To Be Positive
|
Re: Reasons To Be Positive
Quote:
You’re a grown @ss man who is supposed to be IGNORING me. |
Re: Reasons To Be Positive
Quote:
I mean none of this is magic. It's work. You are asking the Saints to do the work. And that's fine. But you must have an idea of what you are looking for in order to fix it. It's clear that the gold standard right now is KC. Other than the obvious, what are the GM, HC, and QB over there doing that puts them in the championship competition virtually every year that you don't see with the Saints? And who out there other than those guys do you see similar traits? SFIAH |
Re: Reasons To Be Positive
Quote:
So, the constructive conversation in this area has two parts. First is to clear out the current regime at some level. And Saints fans all over have been calling for that for a while now. But no one seems to want to address the pretty obvious second part: then who do you replace them with? And that's the question that I'm asking. So, I would hope that unless you want to participate in that conversation, which I don't think you do, that it would be best if you just stay out of it. Training camp is starting in a couple of weeks. There's a whole bunch of things that can be discussed about that, the team, the preseason, and the outlook for the regular season. There's no need for you to throw stones in this conversation. SFIAH |
Re: Reasons To Be Positive
Quote:
You keep asking me questions, when you know I’m only going to complain until THEY speculate on how to fix their own (mis) management. So you’re laying down a troll-chow banquet for me to feast on, and then complaining about me complaining. Gonna be a lonnnnnnnnng season bro. WHODAT!!! |
Re: Reasons To Be Positive
Quote:
|
Re: Reasons To Be Positive
Quote:
Fans speculate about stuff all the time. What players they may get. What record the team may have. But just as you've done is this post you're pointing out the problems. So, you must have some idea about how to go about turning the ship around. It cost absolutely nothing. And the Saints are not going to listen to any of us anyway. You call Allen a limp-d*ck (real surprised that the bad word filter didn't filter this one). So, who out there isn't. Who is a coach that you admire? Would you take CSP if he were willing to come back? Just because you're a fan doesn't mean that you don't have a brain. You must have thoughts about how the Saints can get back into the winners circle. All I'm asking is for you to share your thoughts on it. Even go back to the decline that you saw. How could the Saints have mitigated that at the time? Should the Saints have drafted/traded for a legit successor while Brees was still here? I think many of us thought that the Saints were still in a championship window and that spending resources for Brees' replacement when the team still had a chance to win another SB with Brees may have been premature. In hindsight that may have been shortsighted. We have 4-6 years of a track record now. Other than the obvious (Mahommes) who else would have panned out for the team? As for Allen, you definitely think it was a poor choice. Who should they have choosen instead. Did the Saints even get that person in the building at the time? Who would you choose now? I just don't understand why you don't want to talk about any of this. These are questions that have to be answered to make the changes that you are looking for. Since this is going to be such a long season for you, why not talk about what the Saints could do moving forward to get back to winners circle? I don't think that's troll fodder. SFIAH |
Re: Reasons To Be Positive
Quote:
And you also write, “the Saints are not going to listen to any of us anyway.” I complain until THEY work this sh*t out. |
Re: Reasons To Be Positive
Quote:
You already know the truth. The Saints are not going to work this out to your satisfaction. They have had 3 off ramps with Dennis Allen already and chose not to take any of them. If the Saints go 10-7, win the South, and win a home playoff game in 2024 before exiting without a real sniff of a championship, like the Succs did last season, then Allen won't be going anywhere. You can best believe in Loomis' mind that there's nothing to work out if that happens. I keep telling you that if the Saints could work out what you are looking for, they would have done so. So, you are waiting for an event that will never happen. So, that's why I ask you how you would work it out. Clearly you are more clued into the impediments that are keeping the organization from another championship. So, who would you like to see in place at the head of the organization who can actually fix this? The Saints brass are just people. Football people with some experience. But just people like you and I. And with the interwebs we have a lot more access than fans in the past. Let me throw out a name as an example: Michael Borgonzi - KC Chief Assistant GM. Clearly part of the organizational planning of a championship team. Also as director of Pro and College scouting has a plan for putting together a championship roster. How might he turn the ship around? SFIAH |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:24 AM. |
Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com