Loomis: No deadline for Graham deal

Utah_Saint · 04-10-2014, 01:58 PM

Originally Posted by TheOak

What you are missing about lee's post is that "slot receiver" is not a Wide Receiver position, it is not a position of any sort, it is a role that multiple positions line up in TE, RB, WR.

Similar to holder for the place kicker... Scat back is not a position either.

Graham didnt line up as a tackle which is a position, he lined up in a role.

The CBA outlines the positions, if a guard plays tackle then that is a position, not a role.

I didn't miss it. As a matter of fact, that's the whole point.

Graham lined up as a wide out more than any of those players. Why would they be any more of a wideout than Graham.

04-10-2014, 01:58 PM	#7
Utah_Saint Site Donor 2019 Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: Salt Lake City, Utah Posts: 3,521	Re: Loomis: No deadline for Graham deal Originally Posted by TheOak What you are missing about lee's post is that "slot receiver" is not a Wide Receiver position, it is not a position of any sort, it is a role that multiple positions line up in TE, RB, WR. Similar to holder for the place kicker... Scat back is not a position either. Graham didnt line up as a tackle which is a position, he lined up in a role. The CBA outlines the positions, if a guard plays tackle then that is a position, not a role. I didn't miss it. As a matter of fact, that's the whole point. Graham lined up as a wide out more than any of those players. Why would they be any more of a wideout than Graham.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/65424-loomis-no-deadline-graham-deal.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
Loomis: No deadline for Graham deal	This thread	Refback	04-10-2014 10:15 AM	5