Mark Ingram rushes for career-high 172 yards in win over Packers

10-27-2014, 12:44 PM

It doesn't hurt that GB is the worse rushing D in the league...

Lets keep things in perspective.

Rell&Gold · 10-27-2014, 12:47 PM

Originally Posted by Euphoria

It doesn't hurt that GB is the worse rushing D in the league...

Lets keep things in perspective.

That I didn't know until today, but still good to see though

|Mitch| · 10-27-2014, 01:06 PM

Originally Posted by teddybarexxx

and i'm gonna keep blowing my own horn! because nothing absolutely nothing i've said is false. stop looking at stats people please. use your two eyes. look what's being done and not being done to win/lose games. until last night when was the last time we had a 100 yard rusher? i think m ingram came close in week one and that's when we collectively as a rb unit had approx 170+ yards rushing. since then we have 3 rb's going in and out of the game and we had 108, 129 yards rushing. between three backs. please bro. successful running teams have one back putting those numbers up. so keep ignoring me, idk. but i know what i'm talking about. you commit to the run and run effectively we're gonna win a lot more games.

170 yards rushing is 170 yards rushing; no matter who gets the yards and you act like you're the reason the run game was successful... And yes, you don't have a clue what you're talking about, but keep screaming run the ball

Danno · 10-27-2014, 02:15 PM

I gotta give some love to Cadet also. When called upon he delivered. He'll likely never be a Sproles or Thomas but he's fine for that 4th RB special teams guy.

jnormand · 10-27-2014, 03:07 PM

Originally Posted by teddybarexxx

well well well who dats. i was told not start off by saying i told you so. i was told that 108 yrds and 170 something yards rushing was enough. well i'm gonna have to say this..."I TOLD YOU SO". didnt i tell you if you commit to the run game it will open things up for our passing attack. now some of you will say we still rushed for 178 (thaks to m ingram) which is true the point that i made is that the 108's, and 174's that someone brought up should be made by one back. we have 3 very capable and talented rb's. there were no reason why our rushing yards shouldnt be 200+ a game. once ingram started busting up the green bay defense what did you all see?...no pressure to drew brees and wide open receivers. now i saw an article (very briefly saw the title of the article) showing drew brees qb rating, but dont be fooled he had those stats because of the "EFFECTIVE" running of m. ingram. run run run the football and geaux saints!

You've got to be one of the most narcissistic posters I've seen on this sight in the last 10 years. Your posts are some of the most blatent, self righteous and ignorant of any that I've seen. I have no idea how a person can make a very vague comment like "run the ball effectively and we'll win" and pretend that when the team does do so that you've looked through a crystal ball.

That's like me saying "If we win the turnover battle we should win 90% of our games". Then gloating about it after it happens like I'm some sort of football god.

I understand that everyone on this sight has opinion. Most of time they are debatable or at least relevant. But your chest thumping, gloating and painfully obvious "opinions" show you're blissfully unaware of your own narcissistic tendencies.

I've never called someone out on this sight. Never really argued with someone. I have never put anyone on my ignore list. You're the first. Congrats. From this point on I will be able to go to a thread without having to scroll through avoiding your ridiculously annoying posts that show all you want is a pat on the back or a "holy cow man! You were totally right!"

You're so full of yourself its annoying.

Jack Vegas · 10-27-2014, 03:17 PM

He beasted. Good to see him playing well. I hope we can afford to keep him.

Jack Vegas · 10-27-2014, 03:19 PM

Originally Posted by Danno

I gotta give some love to Cadet also. When called upon he delivered. He'll likely never be a Sproles or Thomas but he's fine for that 4th RB special teams guy.

Cadet has not been a popular player on the message board, but we saw last night when he gets a chance he can be pretty productive. He'll never be Darren Sproles but he can be a poor man's PT. That's not bad when he's your fourth option.

rezburna · 10-27-2014, 03:27 PM

I'd like to see us limit the carried of Robinson and Thomas when they return, and keep it as the Ingram show.

spkb25 · 10-27-2014, 03:33 PM

Originally Posted by blackangold

Keep it in perspective; Packers D is not very good. I do think Ingram needs to see more 20+ carry games, he gets rolling and is no doubt the best RB we have. Might not be a bad idea to get away from the RBBC for awhile.

I mean I don't know of why people do this, and you are right. You attack the defenses weakness. It is true that running opens everything up, but if you are not successful at it, like we weren't against Detroit you have to pass and use the run just to keep them honest. Like you said- everything in context

dizzle88 · 10-27-2014, 04:37 PM

Originally Posted by Danno

I gotta give some love to Cadet also. When called upon he delivered. He'll likely never be a Sproles or Thomas but he's fine for that 4th RB special teams guy.

Agreed, I haven't been a fan of cadet but when called upon last night he made the plays and extended some key drives for us. Deserves some credit.
All round great team win.

10-27-2014, 12:44 PM	#21
Threaded by Euphoria 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Hollywood, CA Posts: 7,601 Blog Entries: 5 Rating: (0 votes - average) It doesn't hurt that GB is the worse rushing D in the league... Lets keep things in perspective.
Views: 14515

10-27-2014, 12:47 PM	#22
Rell&Gold 1000 Posts + Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: Washington, D.C Posts: 2,887	Re: Mark Ingram rushes for career-high 172 yards in win over Packers Originally Posted by Euphoria It doesn't hurt that GB is the worse rushing D in the league... Lets keep things in perspective. That I didn't know until today, but still good to see though

10-27-2014, 01:06 PM	#23
\|Mitch\| 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Alexandria, La Posts: 11,303	Re: Mark Ingram rushes for career-high 172 yards in win over Packers Originally Posted by teddybarexxx and i'm gonna keep blowing my own horn! because nothing absolutely nothing i've said is false. stop looking at stats people please. use your two eyes. look what's being done and not being done to win/lose games. until last night when was the last time we had a 100 yard rusher? i think m ingram came close in week one and that's when we collectively as a rb unit had approx 170+ yards rushing. since then we have 3 rb's going in and out of the game and we had 108, 129 yards rushing. between three backs. please bro. successful running teams have one back putting those numbers up. so keep ignoring me, idk. but i know what i'm talking about. you commit to the run and run effectively we're gonna win a lot more games. 170 yards rushing is 170 yards rushing; no matter who gets the yards and you act like you're the reason the run game was successful... And yes, you don't have a clue what you're talking about, but keep screaming run the ball jnormand likes this.

10-27-2014, 02:15 PM	#24
Danno Truth Addict Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R) Posts: 24,720	Re: Mark Ingram rushes for career-high 172 yards in win over Packers I gotta give some love to Cadet also. When called upon he delivered. He'll likely never be a Sproles or Thomas but he's fine for that 4th RB special teams guy. nola_swammi, dizzle88, teddybarexxx and 1 others like this.

10-27-2014, 03:07 PM	#25
jnormand 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: The Free State of Idaho Posts: 5,662	Re: Mark Ingram rushes for career-high 172 yards in win over Packers Originally Posted by teddybarexxx well well well who dats. i was told not start off by saying i told you so. i was told that 108 yrds and 170 something yards rushing was enough. well i'm gonna have to say this..."I TOLD YOU SO". didnt i tell you if you commit to the run game it will open things up for our passing attack. now some of you will say we still rushed for 178 (thaks to m ingram) which is true the point that i made is that the 108's, and 174's that someone brought up should be made by one back. we have 3 very capable and talented rb's. there were no reason why our rushing yards shouldnt be 200+ a game. once ingram started busting up the green bay defense what did you all see?...no pressure to drew brees and wide open receivers. now i saw an article (very briefly saw the title of the article) showing drew brees qb rating, but dont be fooled he had those stats because of the "EFFECTIVE" running of m. ingram. run run run the football and geaux saints! You've got to be one of the most narcissistic posters I've seen on this sight in the last 10 years. Your posts are some of the most blatent, self righteous and ignorant of any that I've seen. I have no idea how a person can make a very vague comment like "run the ball effectively and we'll win" and pretend that when the team does do so that you've looked through a crystal ball. That's like me saying "If we win the turnover battle we should win 90% of our games". Then gloating about it after it happens like I'm some sort of football god. I understand that everyone on this sight has opinion. Most of time they are debatable or at least relevant. But your chest thumping, gloating and painfully obvious "opinions" show you're blissfully unaware of your own narcissistic tendencies. I've never called someone out on this sight. Never really argued with someone. I have never put anyone on my ignore list. You're the first. Congrats. From this point on I will be able to go to a thread without having to scroll through avoiding your ridiculously annoying posts that show all you want is a pat on the back or a "holy cow man! You were totally right!" You're so full of yourself its annoying. spkb25, CharityMike and Utah_Saint like this.

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

10-27-2014, 03:17 PM	#26
Jack Vegas 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 2,254	Re: Mark Ingram rushes for career-high 172 yards in win over Packers He beasted. Good to see him playing well. I hope we can afford to keep him.
Jack Vegas 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 2,254

10-27-2014, 03:19 PM	#27
Jack Vegas 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 2,254	Re: Mark Ingram rushes for career-high 172 yards in win over Packers Originally Posted by Danno I gotta give some love to Cadet also. When called upon he delivered. He'll likely never be a Sproles or Thomas but he's fine for that 4th RB special teams guy. Cadet has not been a popular player on the message board, but we saw last night when he gets a chance he can be pretty productive. He'll never be Darren Sproles but he can be a poor man's PT. That's not bad when he's your fourth option.
Jack Vegas 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 2,254

10-27-2014, 03:27 PM	#28
rezburna 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Feb 2013 Location: Kenner, LA Posts: 7,903	Re: Mark Ingram rushes for career-high 172 yards in win over Packers I'd like to see us limit the carried of Robinson and Thomas when they return, and keep it as the Ingram show. jnormand and CharityMike like this.

10-27-2014, 03:33 PM	#29
spkb25 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Baltimore, MD Posts: 13,097	Re: Mark Ingram rushes for career-high 172 yards in win over Packers Originally Posted by blackangold Keep it in perspective; Packers D is not very good. I do think Ingram needs to see more 20+ carry games, he gets rolling and is no doubt the best RB we have. Might not be a bad idea to get away from the RBBC for awhile. I mean I don't know of why people do this, and you are right. You attack the defenses weakness. It is true that running opens everything up, but if you are not successful at it, like we weren't against Detroit you have to pass and use the run just to keep them honest. Like you said- everything in context

10-27-2014, 04:37 PM	#30
dizzle88 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 11,208	Re: Mark Ingram rushes for career-high 172 yards in win over Packers Originally Posted by Danno I gotta give some love to Cadet also. When called upon he delivered. He'll likely never be a Sproles or Thomas but he's fine for that 4th RB special teams guy. Agreed, I haven't been a fan of cadet but when called upon last night he made the plays and extended some key drives for us. Deserves some credit. All round great team win. hagan714 likes this.

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/69080-mark-ingram-rushes-career-high-172-yards-win-over-packers.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
The Latest New Orleans Saints News \| SportSpyder	This thread	Refback	10-27-2014 11:26 PM	1
Mark Ingram rushes for career-high 172 yards in win over Packers	This thread	Refback	10-27-2014 10:29 AM	4