mitch its not the 170 yards i'm talking about. its the 108's and 129's i'm talking about. i'm saying we as a team shouldnt be held to 108 and 129 yards if you have 3, count em 3 damn good rb's bro. how can anyone that knows football argue that point?

i'm not bragging, nor boasting, nor am i this narcisist. i thought this was a website where you post what and how you see and feel about the saints. i read post on here all the times i dont necessary agree with the person that makes the post(s). the only reason why i would say anyone would say those things about me is because you were one those individuals that
"debated" with me when i said our offense looks stagnant and you all said i was crazy, but when we played the vikes then everyone saw the stagnant offesne or when i said runningj the ball "effectively" was the key to this year's success and everyone said we're top this and that but all i'm was saying hey look at how we're winning and losing games and to me we had a problem running the ball. now anyone on here reading just this post can you honestly say i was wrong. honestly. my only debate was, i felt 108 and 129 yards rushing between 3 backs wasnt enough balance. that we wasnt "effectively" running the football. if you disagree with me thats's cool, for me it wasnt enough. when everyone was downing the defense i said yes our defense has it woes but our offense has theirs as well. where in my post is that being a narcisist? yes i taunted you all this morning out of fun but i see you guys take everything soo serious, geesh.

Mark Ingram was he best football player in that entire draft , problem is we stashed him on the sideline with Sproles , Ivory , Thomas , Cadet , all taking snaps away from him. Add the fact that we pass 45+ times a game , and his history with being knicked up and you get what we got.

People screamed bust from the top of the Superdome , not even giving the kid his fair due.

I want to keep him , problem is he's probably performing this way because he know this is the only way the salvage his reputation in hopes to sign somewhere else because lord knows between Byrd Graham Brees and Jordan's upcoming date for an extension we probably won't have the resources to sign him to an effective deal.

His career would be unbelievable in Seattle where they I bet you are licking their chops on him with their lynch situation going sour.

We have to restructure somewhere or cut a back to make room for him. He not only wants the contract , he wants the carries.

Can we give that to him ?

2011 NFL Draft Results and Analysis: Round 1 - National Football League - ESPN

What? You can't really say that with a straight face?

JJ Watt, AJ Green, Patrick Peterson, Von Miller, Tyron Smith, etc? That was a deep and really really good draft.

Now Ingram throughout his career here has had an unfair shake, but that wasn't just on the Saints. He had trouble reading blocks and it was evident the game was too fast for him when he made the initial transition. He didn't get the snaps because he wasn't ready for them and the players you mentioned were either all on par with him or better. You really think they wanted to trade up into the first round and just sit the former Heisman trophy winner? You can't just expect players to make the jump and be the exact same player they were in college. He wasn't prepared. You could tell in the preseason he was a completely different player this year. He worked harder, studied harder, focused harder, and now both parties are reaping the benefits.

If we decided to finally have a bell cow back, I would ove for us to retain him somehow. It looks like he's over that college to pro transition curve and ready to take the bull by the horns.

Wait what?we committed to the running game all year we're in the top 5 rushing this year