Mark Ingram rushes for career-high 172 yards in win over Packers

DrewDat · 10-28-2014, 11:04 PM

Well after heated debates with fellow Who Dats and being blocked by Ingram himself on twitter i can honestly say I was wrong. Maybe S.P. was holding Ingram back this whole time.....I say we make him the premiere back and spell him with PT and keep Cadet as the scat back....(similar to Bell, Bush & Thomas our championship season) and we should be in rare form.

saintsfan1976 · 10-29-2014, 02:32 PM

Blocked from Twitter by Mark Ingram? You may want to do some soul searching.

Choupique · 10-30-2014, 10:23 AM

i was glad to see ingram have a solid performance.
i wouldn't want to tackle the guy.

the coaches obviously have faith in him.

too bad so many disloyal, fair weather fans don't.

we need a bounty on those folks.

billyt81 · 11-05-2014, 01:33 AM

Could Ingram be the best back in the league? And can he carry us to a title?

Rell&Gold · 10-27-2014, 10:06 AM

Originally Posted by teddybarexxx

well well well who dats. i was told not start off by saying i told you so. i was told that 108 yrds and 170 something yards rushing was enough. well i'm gonna have to say this..."I TOLD YOU SO". didnt i tell you if you commit to the run game it will open things up for our passing attack. now some of you will say we still rushed for 178 (thaks to m ingram) which is true the point that i made is that the 108's, and 174's that someone brought up should be made by one back. we have 3 very capable and talented rb's. there were no reason why our rushing yards shouldnt be 200+ a game. once ingram started busting up the green bay defense what did you all see?...no pressure to drew brees and wide open receivers. now i saw an article (very briefly saw the title of the article) showing drew brees qb rating, but dont be fooled he had those stats because of the "EFFECTIVE" running of m. ingram. run run run the football and geaux saints!

Wait what?we committed to the running game all year we're in the top 5 rushing this year

Danno · 10-27-2014, 10:16 AM

Originally Posted by Rell&Gold

Wait what?we committed to the running game all year we're in the top 5 rushing this year

Forget it, he'll never understand.

|Mitch| · 10-27-2014, 11:19 AM

Originally Posted by Rell&Gold

Wait what?we committed to the running game all year we're in the top 5 rushing this year

I've found it easier to not argue with him, and ignore the blowing of his own horn...

Danno · 10-27-2014, 11:22 AM

Originally Posted by |Mitch|

I've found it easier to not argue with him, and ignore the blowing of his own horn...

Yep, I just updated my ignore list. Unfortunately you still see their nonsense when someone quotes them.

|Mitch| · 10-27-2014, 12:06 PM

Originally Posted by teddybarexxx

and i'm gonna keep blowing my own horn! because nothing absolutely nothing i've said is false. stop looking at stats people please. use your two eyes. look what's being done and not being done to win/lose games. until last night when was the last time we had a 100 yard rusher? i think m ingram came close in week one and that's when we collectively as a rb unit had approx 170+ yards rushing. since then we have 3 rb's going in and out of the game and we had 108, 129 yards rushing. between three backs. please bro. successful running teams have one back putting those numbers up. so keep ignoring me, idk. but i know what i'm talking about. you commit to the run and run effectively we're gonna win a lot more games.

170 yards rushing is 170 yards rushing; no matter who gets the yards and you act like you're the reason the run game was successful... And yes, you don't have a clue what you're talking about, but keep screaming run the ball

ikecomp · 10-27-2014, 04:07 PM

Originally Posted by teddybarexxx

mitch its not the 170 yards i'm talking about. its the 108's and 129's i'm talking about. i'm saying we as a team shouldnt be held to 108 and 129 yards if you have 3, count em 3 damn good rb's bro. how can anyone that knows football argue that point?

Dude, take a second and then take one good deep breath. No one here is disagreeing with you that the saints should "CONTINUE" to run the ball. They have been doing that all year but you're making it seem like they have some how just committed to the run because you told them to lol. Dallas has the best rush offense in the league and they are averaging 159 yards/game. We're averaging 133 yards/game. That's not bad. Unless the NFL outlaws passing nobody is going to be averaging 200+ yards a game regardless of how good your backs are because there are teams in the league that can actually play good rush defense. Having a balanced is attack is important but somehow saying we should be averaging 200+ yards a game is just silly.

10-28-2014, 11:04 PM	#1
DrewDat DOMEPATROL Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Jacksonville,Florida Due To Military Obligation Posts: 479	Re: Mark Ingram rushes for career-high 172 yards in win over Packers Well after heated debates with fellow Who Dats and being blocked by Ingram himself on twitter i can honestly say I was wrong. Maybe S.P. was holding Ingram back this whole time.....I say we make him the premiere back and spell him with PT and keep Cadet as the scat back....(similar to Bell, Bush & Thomas our championship season) and we should be in rare form.

10-29-2014, 02:32 PM	#2
saintsfan1976 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Atlanta Posts: 10,991 Blog Entries: 3	Re: Mark Ingram rushes for career-high 172 yards in win over Packers Blocked from Twitter by Mark Ingram? You may want to do some soul searching. Crusader likes this.

10-30-2014, 10:23 AM	#3
Choupique 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 2,594	Re: Mark Ingram rushes for career-high 172 yards in win over Packers i was glad to see ingram have a solid performance. i wouldn't want to tackle the guy. the coaches obviously have faith in him. too bad so many disloyal, fair weather fans don't. we need a bounty on those folks.
Choupique 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 2,594

11-05-2014, 01:33 AM	#4
billyt81 1000 Posts + Join Date: Feb 2013 Location: Metairie Posts: 1,129	Re: Mark Ingram rushes for career-high 172 yards in win over Packers Could Ingram be the best back in the league? And can he carry us to a title?

10-27-2014, 10:06 AM	#5
Rell&Gold 1000 Posts + Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: Washington, D.C Posts: 2,891	Re: Mark Ingram rushes for career-high 172 yards in win over Packers Originally Posted by teddybarexxx well well well who dats. i was told not start off by saying i told you so. i was told that 108 yrds and 170 something yards rushing was enough. well i'm gonna have to say this..."I TOLD YOU SO". didnt i tell you if you commit to the run game it will open things up for our passing attack. now some of you will say we still rushed for 178 (thaks to m ingram) which is true the point that i made is that the 108's, and 174's that someone brought up should be made by one back. we have 3 very capable and talented rb's. there were no reason why our rushing yards shouldnt be 200+ a game. once ingram started busting up the green bay defense what did you all see?...no pressure to drew brees and wide open receivers. now i saw an article (very briefly saw the title of the article) showing drew brees qb rating, but dont be fooled he had those stats because of the "EFFECTIVE" running of m. ingram. run run run the football and geaux saints! Wait what?we committed to the running game all year we're in the top 5 rushing this year

10-27-2014, 10:16 AM	#6
Danno Truth Addict Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R) Posts: 24,750	Re: Mark Ingram rushes for career-high 172 yards in win over Packers Originally Posted by Rell&Gold Wait what?we committed to the running game all year we're in the top 5 rushing this year Forget it, he'll never understand. jnormand, jlouhill, Rell&Gold and 1 others like this.

10-27-2014, 11:19 AM	#7
\|Mitch\| 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Alexandria, La Posts: 11,303	Re: Mark Ingram rushes for career-high 172 yards in win over Packers Originally Posted by Rell&Gold Wait what?we committed to the running game all year we're in the top 5 rushing this year I've found it easier to not argue with him, and ignore the blowing of his own horn... jnormand and jlouhill like this.

10-27-2014, 11:22 AM	#8
Danno Truth Addict Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R) Posts: 24,750	Re: Mark Ingram rushes for career-high 172 yards in win over Packers Originally Posted by \|Mitch\| I've found it easier to not argue with him, and ignore the blowing of his own horn... Yep, I just updated my ignore list. Unfortunately you still see their nonsense when someone quotes them. jnormand likes this.

10-27-2014, 12:06 PM	#9
\|Mitch\| 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Alexandria, La Posts: 11,303	Re: Mark Ingram rushes for career-high 172 yards in win over Packers Originally Posted by teddybarexxx and i'm gonna keep blowing my own horn! because nothing absolutely nothing i've said is false. stop looking at stats people please. use your two eyes. look what's being done and not being done to win/lose games. until last night when was the last time we had a 100 yard rusher? i think m ingram came close in week one and that's when we collectively as a rb unit had approx 170+ yards rushing. since then we have 3 rb's going in and out of the game and we had 108, 129 yards rushing. between three backs. please bro. successful running teams have one back putting those numbers up. so keep ignoring me, idk. but i know what i'm talking about. you commit to the run and run effectively we're gonna win a lot more games. 170 yards rushing is 170 yards rushing; no matter who gets the yards and you act like you're the reason the run game was successful... And yes, you don't have a clue what you're talking about, but keep screaming run the ball jnormand likes this.

10-27-2014, 04:07 PM	#10
ikecomp 100th Post Join Date: Sep 2013 Posts: 329	Re: Mark Ingram rushes for career-high 172 yards in win over Packers Originally Posted by teddybarexxx mitch its not the 170 yards i'm talking about. its the 108's and 129's i'm talking about. i'm saying we as a team shouldnt be held to 108 and 129 yards if you have 3, count em 3 damn good rb's bro. how can anyone that knows football argue that point? Dude, take a second and then take one good deep breath. No one here is disagreeing with you that the saints should "CONTINUE" to run the ball. They have been doing that all year but you're making it seem like they have some how just committed to the run because you told them to lol. Dallas has the best rush offense in the league and they are averaging 159 yards/game. We're averaging 133 yards/game. That's not bad. Unless the NFL outlaws passing nobody is going to be averaging 200+ yards a game regardless of how good your backs are because there are teams in the league that can actually play good rush defense. Having a balanced is attack is important but somehow saying we should be averaging 200+ yards a game is just silly. jnormand, Danno, \|Mitch\| and 2 others like this.
ikecomp 100th Post Join Date: Sep 2013 Posts: 329

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/69080-mark-ingram-rushes-career-high-172-yards-win-over-packers.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
The Latest New Orleans Saints News \| SportSpyder	This thread	Refback	10-27-2014 10:26 PM	1
Mark Ingram rushes for career-high 172 yards in win over Packers	This thread	Refback	10-27-2014 09:29 AM	4