|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by Rugby Saint II I understand your thinking. I thought so myself initially. However, after some reflection I realized that giving Davison and Onyamata extra reps should increase their situational awareness and make them much more effective under ...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 13,145
|
Re: Sheldon Rankins has chance to be more effective than Nick Fairley
Originally Posted by Rugby Saint II
But that is like saying how beneficial it would be for Chase Daniel if Drew went down because he'd get extra reps. I mean yeah it would be really good for Chase, I guess, but is it better for the team?
![]()
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bossier City, LA
Posts: 26,676
|
Re: Sheldon Rankins has chance to be more effective than Nick Fairley
No. There is a big difference. Chase Daniel was signed to be nothing more than a backup with no plan for him to ever have to play a meaningful snap. Rankins and Onyemata are hopefully future starters and any playing time will get them closer to that goal. The same can be said for the Ramczyk/Armstead situation. And nobody said losing either Armstead or Fairley was better for the team. We simply said given the situation at least there can be positive ramifications.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/83341-sheldon-rankins-has-chance-more-effective-than-nick-fairley.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
Article Sheldon Rankins has chance to be more e... | SportSpyder | This thread | Refback | 07-07-2017 09:25 PM | 1 |
Sheldon Rankins has chance to be more effective than Nick Fairley | This thread | Refback | 07-07-2017 02:02 PM | 2 |