What point? You have made no point. Are you trying to convince yourself that not dwelling on the past is some sort of character flaw? Or trying to convince others?

Or are you trying to make a point that looking for everything that you can possibly criticize makes one a greater fan?

You're incapable of giving an honest, non-bias'd assessment, and that goes to the bigger point you refuse to admit when you're wrong...

I have admitted to be wrong both times. And talk about bias. We all have bias's. That is basic human nature. You yourself have a well known bias against the Saints front office and Sean Payton. Others have a bias against Jamies Winston. Others have had one against Drew Brees.

And again with being wrong, how many time have you admitted to being wrong?

Have been critical of their moves, yes. Makes me and others no less a Saints fan for doing so. In fact, it shows objectivity...

Now when have you admitted to being wrong? Not the wrong part, which is often, but the admission of it? Was it since the last Ice Age?

Point out any specific instances where I have been wrong. I'm sure you'll try to list times I have had viewpoints differing from yours. In those instances have you considered that you may have been wrong?

Well, waiting.

And I never said you were less of a Saints fan for your criticism. Nor am I any less of a Saints fan because I see very little to criticize these last 15 years or so. Anything I have seen is so trivial it has faded away.

I must say though, the white Nike shoes with the white tuxedo by Payton was not a good look.

Still waiting for you demonstrate one instance of objectivity and to name one time you have been critical of Payton...

#Waiting

Why would I want to be objective? What do I have to gain from that? The fact that I do not search for things to displease me about my Saints is something negative?