Reading this post again, I’m gonna respond…since it’s what you wanted to hear from me..

You are a dishonest Guido (putting it mildly).

Going back to post 43 of this thread in a discussion about what is driving the recent trends regarding the multi facets of injuries and how they are being handled throughout the league I said:

“In other words there isn’t someone on the Saints telling Thomas he can’t play. It’s Thomas saying he’s not ready.

Maybe I’m wrong.”

You respond with a post that starts..

“Totally disagree.”


Ok, fair enough. I admitted I could be wrong (mainly because the topic was about an opinion that can’t be proven). So you go on to stake an “argument” that emotionally goes into the specifics of his injury. It was NOT the point I was making, nor was it the topic of discussion. You take two clear statements I make :

“ I do not believe the Saints staff is telling Thomas to sit while Thomas is saying, “No, I can play!”.”

AND

“In other words there isn’t someone on the Saints telling Thomas he can’t play. It’s Thomas saying he’s not ready.”

And you twist those statements to accuse me of saying Thomas “refuses” to play (along with a little emoji that is meant to be cute I guess). Then say you contacted some hacks to back up your point.

That is clear manipulation and your usual MO.