Official 2023 OFFSEASON Thread

AsylumGuido · 03-27-2023, 10:30 AM

Originally Posted by papz

Are you going to report your own post for calling people simple minded though?

Just curious.

Anyways, it's not simple minded to be concerned about how we operate. It's all about the circumstance that we're in. Now that we have a legitimate quarterback, "kicking the can" is just fine since we're competing and the cap going up year to year. Now if Dalton or Winston was the starting quarterback for the next couple of seasons, what we're doing doesn't as much sense. The key is being able to see both sides of the argument which some refuse to acknowledge. There's merit to both sides.

The success of the methodology being used by the Saints for the last decade plus depends upon it's being continued as long as the cap continues to skyrocket. To suddenly abandon the philosophy defeats that purpose. That is the simple-mindedness of the Twitter users to which Saunders was addressing in his post and of which I was agreeing.

Yes, there could be merit to both approaches but not when you consider dumping one approach for another in midstream. Correct?

03-27-2023, 10:30 AM	#10
AsylumGuido 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Bossier City, LA Posts: 26,622	Re: Official 2023 OFFSEASON Thread Originally Posted by papz Are you going to report your own post for calling people simple minded though? Just curious. Anyways, it's not simple minded to be concerned about how we operate. It's all about the circumstance that we're in. Now that we have a legitimate quarterback, "kicking the can" is just fine since we're competing and the cap going up year to year. Now if Dalton or Winston was the starting quarterback for the next couple of seasons, what we're doing doesn't as much sense. The key is being able to see both sides of the argument which some refuse to acknowledge. There's merit to both sides. The success of the methodology being used by the Saints for the last decade plus depends upon it's being continued as long as the cap continues to skyrocket. To suddenly abandon the philosophy defeats that purpose. That is the simple-mindedness of the Twitter users to which Saunders was addressing in his post and of which I was agreeing. Yes, there could be merit to both approaches but not when you consider dumping one approach for another in midstream. Correct?