|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Here's another one that supposedly didn't have a strong arm: Joe Montana...
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-24-2006, 08:21 AM | #101 |
Part Time Pimp
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,967
|
Here's another one that supposedly didn't have a strong arm:
Joe Montana |
Latest Blogs | |
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn
Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey
CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey |
02-24-2006, 09:24 AM | #102 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 6,941
|
Originally Posted by BlackandBlue
Again, to place the blame for the offensive woe's on McCarthy. Someone had to be the scapegoat. It's quite possible to me. Brooks is McCarthy's golden boy and Haz tied his fate to him as well, and they both went to bat for the guy getting a huge raise. Now, if this same guy isn't picking up the playbook as well as he should, would YOU announce that? You have just tied your career to this guy, would you be telling the media you had to scale back the playbook? BUT, if the OC leaves, and you need a person to blame for offensive woes, the terminology was too much and there were too many plays and we were holding it in the huddle too long and yatta yatta yatta. I am willing to bet, if we had gotten rid of Brooks last year, you would have heard the team mention all his negatives and place the balme on him. It just so happens McCarthy was the one who left, so he took the blame.
|
02-24-2006, 05:07 PM | #103 |
Kinder, gentler
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: dirty south
Posts: 3,889
|
I understand announcing it after McCarthy leaves, to use him as the scapegoat, I get that.
But it was announced a year before McCarthy left. And as if that wasn't enough, it had to be further dumbed down the year he left. Ehh, not even sure what the point is anymore, other than he was too stupid to pick it up after several changes throughout the past few years. But, it didn't happen while Turley was here, so I don't know how he can comment on it. |
02-25-2006, 02:42 PM | #104 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 6,941
|
And all I am saying is, you don't KNOW it didn't happen when Turley was here. All you can say is you didn't hear about it. Right?
|
02-25-2006, 03:40 PM | #105 |
Kinder, gentler
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: dirty south
Posts: 3,889
|
It is of my opinion that it didn't happen. Tweaked, yes, dummied up, no.
|
02-26-2006, 05:08 AM | #107 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 6,941
|
Originally Posted by BlackandBlue
Ok then. So neither of us know, so we can't really knock the guy can we? :P
|
02-26-2006, 08:43 AM | #108 |
500th Post
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Belleview, FL
Posts: 526
|
|
02-26-2006, 10:16 AM | #109 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,928
|
|
02-26-2006, 12:04 PM | #110 |
500th Post
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Belleview, FL
Posts: 526
|
the leinart haters have to come up with an excuse not to draft him. all their arguments fail.
trade down to draft hawk or brick-why when we can get a solid lb with our early 2nd rounder, and OT isn't as big as a need as a qb or lb. draft young-dumb, but fast...sounds great come on haters...give me some more arguments to smash. haha |