Register All Albums FAQ Community Experience
Go Back   New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints

Do we need to address the RB position

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Just like at tight end.....let's go with what we have for at least one more season. If it doesn't work out, then back to the drawing board on one or both of those positions....

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-28-2008, 05:27 PM   #11
Faqda Falcons
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ruston, Louisiana
Posts: 3,465
Blog Entries: 3
Re: Do we need to address the RB position

Just like at tight end.....let's go with what we have for at least one more season. If it doesn't work out, then back to the drawing board on one or both of those positions.
D_it_up is offline  
Old 04-28-2008, 05:36 PM   #12
With an "E"
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Madisonville, LA
Posts: 429
Re: Do we need to address the RB position

Disagree. I think we need to address the TE position. Although Shockey had his baggage, he got us excited about upgrading that position. Another RB or two in camp would not hurt.
andersen is offline  
Old 04-28-2008, 05:41 PM   #13
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Canton, Ohio
Posts: 2,685
Blog Entries: 2
Re: Do we need to address the RB position

im kinda on the fence with u guys....i think that we could always bring in another RB cuz duece probly wont be back to his form...i like our TEs being able to block....they are much better blockers than shockey..but i think our spread offense that we run would utilize a recieving type better...shockey would step in and make pro bowl after pro bowl becoming drews favorite target
CantonLegend is offline  
Old 04-28-2008, 05:46 PM   #14
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,423
Re: Do we need to address the RB position

I think health concerns for the duration of the season are the biggest concern here. With Duece and Reggie spelling each other, we don't need Duece at 100%. As long as Duece can still pound the middle and fall forward on 2nd and 3rd down, we'll be ok - we'll use Reggie for big play potential. Of course, this will make our play calling more predicatble.

The problem is Reggie is a bit too small to be an every down back for a running team (he'll end up hurt), and Duece's durability is a serious question mark. I like Thomas, but he isn't a fanchise back.

If I had to guess, by week 8 we'll be wishing we'd got ourselves an every down type back. Though we could do worse than Reggie and Thomas as our starting pair.

"... I was beating them with my eyes the whole game..." - Aaron Brooks
JKool is offline  
Old 04-28-2008, 05:54 PM   #15
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,137
Re: Do we need to address the RB position

Originally Posted by JKool View Post
I think health concerns for the duration of the season are the biggest concern here. With Duece and Reggie spelling each other, we don't need Duece at 100%. As long as Duece can still pound the middle and fall forward on 2nd and 3rd down, we'll be ok - we'll use Reggie for big play potential. Of course, this will make our play calling more predicatble.

The problem is Reggie is a bit too small to be an every down back for a running team (he'll end up hurt), and Duece's durability is a serious question mark. I like Thomas, but he isn't a fanchise back.

If I had to guess, by week 8 we'll be wishing we'd got ourselves an every down type back. Though we could do worse than Reggie and Thomas as our starting pair.

I still think Reggie can be an every down back. He is no smaller or less ripped than Brian Westbrook. He just needs to learn HOW to run at this level. Last year when Reggie really commited to a hole he had a couple of decent games. When he started dancing the jitter bug and seeing holes that weren't there thats when he got in trouble. We should do the Broncos running plan and limit him to one cut per run.
stockman311 is offline  
Old 04-28-2008, 05:56 PM   #16
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 6,324
Re: Do we need to address the RB position

Originally Posted by WhoDat205;16454 1
I don't expect Deuce to ever be 100% again. If he does, that will be a monumental blessing for us.

That said, I have no problems with us passing 50-60 times a game.
I know you are joking about throwing it that much, but 5-10 more attempts a game would not bother me. Reggie is more explosive on a swing pass, and Drew used a ton of different receivers last year.

As for Deuce, no, he won't be the same, but neither was Bettis, and he was still effective. 26 is now a good player in a new role
ScottF is offline  
Old 04-28-2008, 06:00 PM   #17
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,423
Re: Do we need to address the RB position

Westbrook is a rarity (and maybe Reggie will be too), but I'd say the same thing about his size - too small for an every down back (on a running team). If we're going to pass primarily, maybe Reggie will be an every down guy - we're just going to have to emphasize the pass even a bit more.

I can't agree more with your idea of limiting cutbacks in our running schemes. However, forcing a player to change his style is no easy thing.
JKool is offline  
Old 04-28-2008, 06:03 PM   #18
LB Mentallity
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 15,870
Blog Entries: 68
Re: Do we need to address the RB position

I say run with PT till he shows he can not handle it.
hagan714 is offline  
Old 04-28-2008, 06:06 PM   #19
Rookie
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 5
Re: Do we need to address the RB position

I am not sure if it was that he saw holes that were not there, to me it seemed like he would always outrun his blockers and wasn't patient enough to let the hole open up for him.
Taedoc is offline  
Old 04-28-2008, 06:08 PM   #20
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hollywood, CA
Posts: 7,601
Blog Entries: 5
Re: Do we need to address the RB position

If you want to replace Deuce that is more of a long term problem we will have to fix. Alexander or Rhodes is a quick fix. At this point you go with Deuce. You wait and see what happens in camp and then you either go for the quick fix or not. You get anyone one of these players you'll be looking in the draft next year for a top RB to come in long term.
Euphoria is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:45 PM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts