|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Just like at tight end.....let's go with what we have for at least one more season. If it doesn't work out, then back to the drawing board on one or both of those positions....
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-28-2008, 05:27 PM | #11 |
Faqda Falcons
|
Re: Do we need to address the RB position
Just like at tight end.....let's go with what we have for at least one more season. If it doesn't work out, then back to the drawing board on one or both of those positions.
|
Latest Blogs | |
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn
Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey
CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey |
04-28-2008, 05:36 PM | #12 |
With an "E"
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Madisonville, LA
Posts: 429
|
Re: Do we need to address the RB position
Disagree. I think we need to address the TE position. Although Shockey had his baggage, he got us excited about upgrading that position. Another RB or two in camp would not hurt.
|
04-28-2008, 05:41 PM | #13 |
1000 Posts +
|
Re: Do we need to address the RB position
im kinda on the fence with u guys....i think that we could always bring in another RB cuz duece probly wont be back to his form...i like our TEs being able to block....they are much better blockers than shockey..but i think our spread offense that we run would utilize a recieving type better...shockey would step in and make pro bowl after pro bowl becoming drews favorite target
|
04-28-2008, 05:46 PM | #14 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,423
|
Re: Do we need to address the RB position
I think health concerns for the duration of the season are the biggest concern here. With Duece and Reggie spelling each other, we don't need Duece at 100%. As long as Duece can still pound the middle and fall forward on 2nd and 3rd down, we'll be ok - we'll use Reggie for big play potential. Of course, this will make our play calling more predicatble.
The problem is Reggie is a bit too small to be an every down back for a running team (he'll end up hurt), and Duece's durability is a serious question mark. I like Thomas, but he isn't a fanchise back. If I had to guess, by week 8 we'll be wishing we'd got ourselves an every down type back. Though we could do worse than Reggie and Thomas as our starting pair. |
"... I was beating them with my eyes the whole game..." - Aaron Brooks
|
|
04-28-2008, 05:54 PM | #15 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,137
|
Re: Do we need to address the RB position
Originally Posted by JKool
I still think Reggie can be an every down back. He is no smaller or less ripped than Brian Westbrook. He just needs to learn HOW to run at this level. Last year when Reggie really commited to a hole he had a couple of decent games. When he started dancing the jitter bug and seeing holes that weren't there thats when he got in trouble. We should do the Broncos running plan and limit him to one cut per run. |
04-28-2008, 05:56 PM | #16 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 6,324
|
Re: Do we need to address the RB position
Originally Posted by WhoDat205;16454 1
I know you are joking about throwing it that much, but 5-10 more attempts a game would not bother me. Reggie is more explosive on a swing pass, and Drew used a ton of different receivers last year.
As for Deuce, no, he won't be the same, but neither was Bettis, and he was still effective. 26 is now a good player in a new role |
04-28-2008, 06:00 PM | #17 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,423
|
Re: Do we need to address the RB position
Westbrook is a rarity (and maybe Reggie will be too), but I'd say the same thing about his size - too small for an every down back (on a running team). If we're going to pass primarily, maybe Reggie will be an every down guy - we're just going to have to emphasize the pass even a bit more.
I can't agree more with your idea of limiting cutbacks in our running schemes. However, forcing a player to change his style is no easy thing. |
04-28-2008, 06:06 PM | #19 |
Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 5
|
Re: Do we need to address the RB position
I am not sure if it was that he saw holes that were not there, to me it seemed like he would always outrun his blockers and wasn't patient enough to let the hole open up for him.
|
04-28-2008, 06:08 PM | #20 |
5000 POSTS! +
|
Re: Do we need to address the RB position
If you want to replace Deuce that is more of a long term problem we will have to fix. Alexander or Rhodes is a quick fix. At this point you go with Deuce. You wait and see what happens in camp and then you either go for the quick fix or not. You get anyone one of these players you'll be looking in the draft next year for a top RB to come in long term.
|