|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; You're absolutely right, we'll see what Mendenhall does next year. Makes sense about Hester and Co., seeing as how Reggie Bush and Stecker was still starting on the Saints - even though Pierre Thomas was the better running back!...
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
05-09-2008, 03:58 PM | #51 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,627
|
Re: Do we need to address the RB position
You're absolutely right, we'll see what Mendenhall does next year.
Makes sense about Hester and Co., seeing as how Reggie Bush and Stecker was still starting on the Saints - even though Pierre Thomas was the better running back! |
Latest Blogs | |
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn
Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey
CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey |
05-09-2008, 04:08 PM | #52 |
Rookie
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Houma, LA
Posts: 27
|
Re: Do we need to address the RB position
[QUOTE=pakowitz;165966]
..let me explain it to you like this... jacob hester was the starting RB for LSU this past year as a SR.. is that b/c he is a better RB then TRUE SOPHOMORES Keiland Williams, Charles Scott, or Richard Murphy? NO! its b/c he had more experience and he knew the system better... any half descent LSU fan knows that a 3 of this years RBs have 10 times more talent then jacob hester.. WOW! Are you serious. There is absolutly NO WAY that any of those 3 backs could have made the hard yards Hester made last year. Hester is the reason that we won the overtime gams we won. He is definately the reason we beat Florida. Do you honestly believe that without Hester in there Miles would have attempted all those 4th downs. I would even trade Duece right now for Hester ( and I even loved Duece when he was at Ole Miss...and I hate Ole Miss) Hester has power a plenty, sleeper speed and a heart that I don't know how it fits in his chest it's so big. I'll take that anyday over a finess back. |
05-09-2008, 04:21 PM | #53 |
The Dark Overlord
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: dirty south
Posts: 3,450
|
Re: Do we need to address the RB position
yes i am serious.. hester is a good player but he doesnt have the talent that the other 3 players have.. you cant argue that.. he doesnt have the speed or athleticism of any of those guys.. which is my point.. he was starting b/c of the experience.. not b/c of the ability...
im a huge LSU fan but you really need to take off the purple n gold glasses |
Last edited by pakowitz; 05-09-2008 at 04:24 PM.. |
|
05-09-2008, 04:25 PM | #54 |
Rookie
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Houma, LA
Posts: 27
|
Re: Do we need to address the RB position
He runs a 4.5 40. That is pretty fast in my book and it was his talent that put him on the field.
|
05-09-2008, 04:30 PM | #55 |
The Dark Overlord
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: dirty south
Posts: 3,450
|
Re: Do we need to address the RB position
Jacob Hester
Combine Results Combine Invite: Yes Height: 5'10" Weight: 226 40 Yrd Dash: 4.61 20 Yrd Dash: 2.65 10 Yrd Dash: 1.50 225 Lb. Bench Reps: 23 Vertical Jump: 27 1/2 Broad Jump: 09'03" 20 Yrd Shuttle: 4.24 3-Cone Drill: 6.85 and i never said he didnt have talent.. i said that the other players are more talented yet less experienced... its really a simple concept... if you really honestly believe that hester has more talent than even 1 of the other 3, then i say u have a man crush on hester b/c he really isnt that athletic of a player, you just let your love for the way he plays influence u |
I Live In Beastmode!
|
|
05-10-2008, 04:50 AM | #56 |
1000 Posts +
|
Re: Do we need to address the RB position
jewagr, how can u say that duece is a finesse back?.....he has been there for years for us pulling out hard yards..catching passes...side stepping....he isnt finesse....he was great at doing it all....jacob hester didnt even come to us and to trade duece for a sub-par NFL back at best would be ridiculous...Duece will start this year when he is healthy....because he has earned it...now on the PT subject....i like PT and i hope he does turn out as everyone claims he is....i just dont see it like that right now...i think the depth chart at running back is unaltered from last year to this year....PT didnt prove ne thing to me that aaron stecker and duece didnt.....reggie is different...but thats a different topic...to say that PT should start over duece is absurd....i hope he turns out great tho because that would mean a top running game to go along with our top passing game....i may be mistaken but doesnt duece have the record for most games in a row with at least 100 yards rushing?....how can u sit that behind a 2nd year player with limited experience...PT will get his touches.....just dont expect him to be starting for us...at least this year
|
"deal with it or you can go play the saints and get trounced by 30 and you won't have to worry about it."-colin cowherd
|
|
05-10-2008, 04:01 PM | #57 |
Rookie
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Houma, LA
Posts: 27
|
Re: Do we need to address the RB position
Fist off...Canton...I was not refering to Duece. Duece is a machine. i would never talk bad about him in any way.
Next...Pakowitz....Talent is only as good as the sytem in which it is place allows it to be. Reggie Bush is a perfect example. He is a very talented back but he talent was worthless last year because we ran a system that was not the right fit for him. He is no good as an every down back. We all knew that when we signed him (at least most of us did). For the system that was being ran last year at LSU...Hester was the most talented back. The sytem needed a bruiser adn that is what Hester is...so yes...he was the most talented for the system. As far as letting the way he plays influence me...guilty...because at the end of the day...the way a player performs on the field is all that matters. Combine speed meens jack...field speed meens everything! |
Last edited by jewagr007; 05-10-2008 at 04:11 PM.. |
|
05-10-2008, 04:55 PM | #58 |
Problem?
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 11,744
|
Re: Do we need to address the RB position
1. Keiland Williams
2. Richard Murphy 3. Charles Scott 4. Jacob Hester That's how I rank them in talent. Hester was the least talented back but his heart, smarts, instinct, and experience made him the featured back last year. He's solid overall and didn't have a real weakness. Now I wouldn't say we wouldn't have tried all those 4th and 1's last year w/o Hester back there because Scott is a bruiser himself... but I certainly wouldn't have been as comfortable doing those plays w/o him. We don't know if the other backs could or could not do what Hester did because they weren't put into position to do so... that was Jacob's job. But, the other backs certainly were talented enough. |
Everyone is entitled to be stupid, but some abuse the privilege.
All little common sense goes a long way. |
|
05-12-2008, 04:30 PM | #59 |
Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Baton Rouge
Posts: 16
|
Re: Do we need to address the RB position
Jerry Rice didn't run the fastest 40 yd either. Game speed and track speed are two different things. Rice has a huge heart and a love for the game. A true warrior.
Does anyone ever remember that Hester only fumbled the ball one time the entire season? Ball security is huge. Additionally does anyone remember Hester running down the Bama CB after an INT? Hester also played special teams. I'm not taking anything away from Williams, Murphy or Scott nor will I compare them. They are all great backs and I look forward to watching them play next season. Obviously Miles knew what he was doing otherwise we would have not won the title. |
Forget Dominic Rhodes, bring in Alley Broussard!!
BiggieX |
|
05-13-2008, 02:58 PM | #60 |
Rookie
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Houma, LA
Posts: 27
|
Re: Do we need to address the RB position
Originally Posted by BiggieX
Thanks BiggeX. Finally someone gets it!
|