Register All Albums FAQ Community Experience
Go Back   New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints

Savings if cut or traded

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; I've listed the 2015 cap and dead money figures for our 2015 team. If you look at the table, its obvious that we cannot trade several players that keep popping up in trade scenarios. Aint gonna happen Player....... Pos...... Cap ...

Like Tree14Likes

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-23-2014, 04:45 PM   #1
Truth Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,747
Savings if cut or traded

I've listed the 2015 cap and dead money figures for our 2015 team.

If you look at the table, its obvious that we cannot trade several players that keep popping up in trade scenarios. Aint gonna happen
Player.......Pos......Cap Figure........Dead Money........Savings if cut or traded
     
Drew BreesQB$26,400,000 ($14,800,000)$11,600,000
Junior GaletteOLB$15,450,000 ($16,200,000)($750,000)
Jimmy GrahamTE$11,000,000 ($11,900,000)($900,000)
Jahri EvansG$11,000,000 ($5,000,000)$6,000,000
Jairus ByrdS$10,300,000 ($8,800,000)$1,500,000
Marques ColstonWR$9,700,000 ($5,400,000)$4,300,000
Ben GrubbsG$9,600,000 ($6,000,000)$3,600,000
Curtis LoftonILB$9,000,000 ($5,000,000)$4,000,000
Cameron JordanDE$6,969,000  $6,969,000
Brodrick BunkleyDT$6,112,500 ($3,225,000)$2,887,500
David HawthorneOLB$6,010,000 ($3,020,000)$2,990,000
Keenan LewisCB$4,850,000 ($6,900,000)($2,050,000)
Thomas MorsteadP$3,400,000 ($2,150,000)$1,250,000
Zach StriefRT$3,200,000 ($6,400,000)($3,200,000)
Kenny VaccaroS$2,570,376 ($5,569,148)($2,998,772)
Pierre ThomasRB$2,565,000 ($830,000)$1,735,000
Rafael BushS$1,950,000  $1,950,000
Brandin CooksWR$1,905,330 ($6,077,589)($4,172,259)
Benjamin WatsonTE$1,900,000 ($400,000)$1,500,000
Erik LorigFB$1,050,000 ($750,000)$300,000
Justin DrescherLS$875,000 ($220,000)$655,000
Stanley Jean-BaptisteCB$826,530 ($1,149,822)($323,292)
Akiem HicksDE$808,225 ($135,725)$672,500
Terron ArmsteadLT$769,359 ($308,718)$460,641
Nick ToonWR$761,903 ($101,903)$660,000
John JenkinsDT$746,890 ($283,780)$463,110
Corey WhiteCB$704,125 ($44,125)$660,000
Kenny StillsWR$633,613 ($97,226)$536,387
Glenn FosterDE$587,334 ($2,334)$585,000
Josh HillTE$586,668 ($1,668)$585,000
Tim LelitoC$586,668 ($1,668)$585,000
Khiry RobinsonRB$585,334 ($334)$585,000
Vinnie SunseriS$554,125 ($132,375)$421,750
Ronald PowellOLB$552,215 ($126,645)$425,570
Marcus BallS$512,000 ($4,000)$508,000
Ty ZimmermanS$511,500  $511,500
Brian DixonCB$510,000  $510,000
Kasim EdebaliDE$510,000  $510,000
Austin JohnsonFB$510,000  $510,000
Seantavius JonesWR$510,000  $510,000
Kyle KnoxOLB$510,000  $510,000
Jalen SaundersWR$510,000  $510,000
Andy TannerWR$510,000  $510,000
Lawrence VirgilDE$510,000  $510,000
For those not familiar with the term dead money, its the money that would still count against our cap if we cut or traded a player.
Danno is offline  
Old 12-23-2014, 04:58 PM   #2
10000 POST CLUB
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 11,518
Re: Savings if cut or traded

Nice work danno

In some instances I think we need to take a hit with the dead money to release or trade guys like David Hawthorne or Jahri Evans, however we are already quite far up the creak due to the back loaded contracts

I wouldn't be completely shocked if Colston was let go, although 5 Mil in dead money is a lot for someone that SP probably still values quite a bit
dizzle88 is offline  
Old 12-23-2014, 05:31 PM   #3
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,254
Re: Savings if cut or traded

Originally Posted by dizzle88 View Post
Nice work danno

In some instances I think we need to take a hit with the dead money to release or trade guys like David Hawthorne or Jahri Evans, however we are already quite far up the creak due to the back loaded contracts

I wouldn't be completely shocked if Colston was let go, although 5 Mil in dead money is a lot for someone that SP probably still values quite a bit
I think people misunderstand the whole dead money thing. The actual cap savings is much more important. A lot of dead money is inefficient, but it doesn't impact the overall cap number if you are replacing the dead money player with someone of comparable skill and a cheaper salary.

A simple example: For instance, if we cut Colston, we would take 9.7 million overall off the cap. We still have to pay Colston 5.4 million in dead money. But we have 4.3 million left to sign a wide receiver.

And that's the big question when it comes to these moves. Could we find a $4.3 million dollar player in free agency to replace him? It seems likely we could, considering how badly he has played as of late.

The Colts ate a ton of dead money contracts in 2012 and rebuilt that team from the ground up and have now made the playoffs three straight years. It's do-able.
Jack Vegas is offline  
Old 12-23-2014, 05:39 PM   #4
10000 POST CLUB
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 11,518
Re: Savings if cut or traded

Originally Posted by Jack Vegas View Post
I think people misunderstand the whole dead money thing. The actual cap savings is much more important. A lot of dead money is inefficient, but it doesn't impact the overall cap number if you are replacing the dead money player with someone of comparable skill and a cheaper salary.

A simple example: For instance, if we cut Colston, we would take 9.7 million overall off the cap. We still have to pay Colston 5.4 million in dead money. But we have 4.3 million left to sign a wide receiver.

And that's the big question when it comes to these moves. Could we find a $4.3 million dollar player in free agency to replace him? It seems likely we could, considering how badly he has played as of late.

The Colts ate a ton of dead money contracts in 2012 and rebuilt that team from the ground up and have now made the playoffs three straight years. It's do-able.
Ahh right thanks JV, that's actually helped a bunch because I think I misunderstood the dead money thing quite a bit

So we do have an opportunity to free up quite a bit of money and get rid of any underachievers at the same time.
dizzle88 is offline  
Old 12-23-2014, 05:53 PM   #5
Truth Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,747
Re: Savings if cut or traded

Originally Posted by Jack Vegas View Post
I think people misunderstand the whole dead money thing. The actual cap savings is much more important. A lot of dead money is inefficient, but it doesn't impact the overall cap number if you are replacing the dead money player with someone of comparable skill and a cheaper salary.

A simple example: For instance, if we cut Colston, we would take 9.7 million overall off the cap. We still have to pay Colston 5.4 million in dead money. But we have 4.3 million left to sign a wide receiver.

And that's the big question when it comes to these moves. Could we find a $4.3 million dollar player in free agency to replace him? It seems likely we could, considering how badly he has played as of late.

The Colts ate a ton of dead money contracts in 2012 and rebuilt that team from the ground up and have now made the playoffs three straight years. It's do-able.
Exactly.

Consider Curtis Lofton. He's way overpaid at 9 Million, but if we cut him could we find a better ILB for 4 million?
Danno is offline  
Old 12-23-2014, 08:46 PM   #6
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,254
Re: Savings if cut or traded

Originally Posted by Danno View Post
Exactly.

Consider Curtis Lofton. He's way overpaid at 9 Million, but if we cut him could we find a better ILB for 4 million?
Obviously anyone who advocates cutting Lofton is nuts. You're not going to find a LB of his caliber in the draft.

But Hawthorne, Bunkley, Evans and Colston are all easily replaceable by mid-level free agent signings and a good draft pick or two. Loomis may not be a football expert, but he's no fool. He can see the guys who are not pulling their weight just like we can.

Originally Posted by halloween 65 View Post
Lelito is servicable but far from a stud.
Lelito has played like a stud though, just about every time he steps on the field - except for the first half of the Cardinals game last year when he got thrown in the fire. Since then, he's been money.
Jack Vegas is offline  
Old 12-24-2014, 06:19 AM   #7
100th Post
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 292
Re: Savings if cut or traded

Originally Posted by Jack Vegas View Post
Obviously anyone who advocates cutting Lofton is nuts. You're not going to find a LB of his caliber in the draft.

But Hawthorne, Bunkley, Evans and Colston are all easily replaceable by mid-level free agent signings and a good draft pick or two. Loomis may not be a football expert, but he's no fool. He can see the guys who are not pulling their weight just like we can.



Lelito has played like a stud though, just about every time he steps on the field - except for the first half of the Cardinals game last year when he got thrown in the fire. Since then, he's been money.
Lol kinda like advocating trading Graham for O line help?? Im glad you see that now Jack ha. We're in a tite space but hoping theres a quick turnover this offseason, bc next years schedule is lookin pretty darn favorable. Hopefully emotion & loyalty doesnt outweigh what has to be done to save this team.
Sarik is offline  
Old 12-23-2014, 05:24 PM   #8
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,254
Re: Savings if cut or traded

IMO the big cuts are Hawthorne, Bunkley and Evans. That, combined with a Brees restructure, gets you in the black easily, and let's be honest those players won't be missed that much.

I hate to say that about Evans, I really do. But he is about 1/3rd the player he was when he was good.

Loomis will manage the cap masterfully as he always does.
Jack Vegas is offline  
Old 12-23-2014, 05:41 PM   #9
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 9,055
Re: Savings if cut or traded

Originally Posted by Jack Vegas View Post
IMO the big cuts are Hawthorne, Bunkley and Evans. That, combined with a Brees restructure, gets you in the black easily, and let's be honest those players won't be missed that much.

I hate to say that about Evans, I really do. But he is about 1/3rd the player he was when he was good.

Loomis will manage the cap masterfully as he always does.
Evans had the benefit of another pro bowl guard right next to him. I believe due to the way Brees plays it is more important for us to have strong guards than tackles. If we got a strong guard to play next to Evans I think we can still get enough solid play out of him to protect Brees for the rest of Brees career. When Brees is done we switch our focus more to left tackle.
The Dude is offline  
Old 12-23-2014, 08:05 PM   #10
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Grand Haven, Michigan by way of a little Mississippi River town in Louisiana
Posts: 5,893
Re: Savings if cut or traded

Originally Posted by The Dude View Post
Evans had the benefit of another pro bowl guard right next to him. I believe due to the way Brees plays it is more important for us to have strong guards than tackles. If we got a strong guard to play next to Evans I think we can still get enough solid play out of him to protect Brees for the rest of Brees career. When Brees is done we switch our focus more to left tackle.
I would like a stud C and a strong G with Grubbs. If your going to protect Brees. Lelito is servicable but far from a stud. I think Evans may be done.
halloween 65 is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/70285-savings-if-cut-traded.html
Posted By For Type Date Hits
The Latest Ty Zimmerman News | SportSpyder This thread Refback 01-01-2015 02:04 PM 3
The Latest Tim Lelito News | SportSpyder This thread Refback 12-23-2014 06:25 PM 1
The Latest Keenan Lewis News | SportSpyder This thread Refback 12-23-2014 05:33 PM 7
The Latest New Orleans Saints News | SportSpyder This thread Refback 12-23-2014 05:09 PM 7
Savings if cut or traded This thread Refback 12-23-2014 04:49 PM 16


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:43 PM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts