Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32

Seer1 · 04-28-2017, 10:42 AM

Originally Posted by Papa Voodoo

Warford, Ramczyk, AP. Kept Kuhn. We're going to be running plenty this year. Armstead-Peat-Unger-Warford-Streif is as much BEEF as we've had since Nicks left.

I was wondering about that last night. Is Sean considering keeping it on the ground more? All he would need to do is figure out the other side of the ball. A strong ground game needs a strong D.

A strong run game with nuclear strike capabilities would be awesome!

Championship!

Seer1 · 04-28-2017, 09:47 AM

To me, it seemed like a buy a great one (on sale) and get another great one for free deal last night. Of course, I've thought all along that Cooks was far from irreplaceable and our 32 was a gift that we used quite well. Plus, how many of us have been screaming, SCREAMING for better OL representation in our drafts for years now? Stay tuned folks, there's plenty of really good stuff to come these next couple of days.

Cruize · 04-28-2017, 10:00 AM

I get both picks. I would have rather had Reddick and Willis. Two players you could have plugged and played on defense and got a CB later. But, they are two top players

K Major · 04-28-2017, 10:17 AM

Who you got at #42 JP?

Bowser? Willis? Tim Williams?

jeanpierre · 04-28-2017, 10:24 AM

Originally Posted by K Major

Who you got at #42 JP?

Bowser? Willis? Tim Williams?

Who I have at 42 or my highest rated player?

Man, thanks to Da Bears, KC Minute Steaks, Planet Houston, Detroit Lion-o's, and other dumbasses we've got some terrific talent no one saw falling...

And I'd consider trading some players now to upgrade and pick up some more picks if talent keeps falling in this draft...

|Mitch| · 04-28-2017, 10:34 AM

RockyMountainSaint and jeanpierre like this.

|Mitch| · 04-28-2017, 10:40 AM

Armstead|Peat|Unger|Warford|Ramcyzk/Strief

On paper looks to be a solid line

frydaddy · 04-28-2017, 10:43 AM

Best OT in a weak draft for O-linemen. That's inspiring.

Ashley · 04-28-2017, 10:56 AM

Again I like the pick, but if from what I hear from the expert analyst that have repeatedly said he will be a back up. I'm hoping get he starts straight up.
All I am saying is I would rather have Defense. 11 DE, 32 lb, or corner.
And if he can get a sack somehow or cause turnovers. I'll do back flips with my Ole ass

|Mitch| · 04-28-2017, 11:00 AM

"He's a technician even though he's only a one-year starter at Wisconsin. He's a day-one starter on the right side. They pair him with Terron Armstead. Drew Brees is a happy guy." -- Mike Mayock

...

04-28-2017, 10:42 AM	#1
Seer1 Site Donor Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Bayou Bayfield CO Posts: 4,722	Re: Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32 Originally Posted by Papa Voodoo Warford, Ramczyk, AP. Kept Kuhn. We're going to be running plenty this year. Armstead-Peat-Unger-Warford-Streif is as much BEEF as we've had since Nicks left. I was wondering about that last night. Is Sean considering keeping it on the ground more? All he would need to do is figure out the other side of the ball. A strong ground game needs a strong D. A strong run game with nuclear strike capabilities would be awesome! Championship! \|Mitch\| likes this.

04-28-2017, 09:47 AM	#2
Seer1 Site Donor Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Bayou Bayfield CO Posts: 4,722	Re: Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32 To me, it seemed like a buy a great one (on sale) and get another great one for free deal last night. Of course, I've thought all along that Cooks was far from irreplaceable and our 32 was a gift that we used quite well. Plus, how many of us have been screaming, SCREAMING for better OL representation in our drafts for years now? Stay tuned folks, there's plenty of really good stuff to come these next couple of days.

04-28-2017, 10:00 AM	#3
Cruize 1000 Posts + Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 4,457	Re: Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32 I get both picks. I would have rather had Reddick and Willis. Two players you could have plugged and played on defense and got a CB later. But, they are two top players
Cruize 1000 Posts + Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 4,457

04-28-2017, 10:24 AM	#5
jeanpierre Site Donor 2018 Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Thibodaux Posts: 43,543 Blog Entries: 39	Re: Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32 Originally Posted by K Major Who you got at #42 JP? Bowser? Willis? Tim Williams? Who I have at 42 or my highest rated player? Man, thanks to Da Bears, KC Minute Steaks, Planet Houston, Detroit Lion-o's, and other dumbasses we've got some terrific talent no one saw falling... And I'd consider trading some players now to upgrade and pick up some more picks if talent keeps falling in this draft... RockyMountainSaint and K Major like this.

04-28-2017, 10:34 AM	#6
\|Mitch\| 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Alexandria, La Posts: 11,303	Re: Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32 Twitter RockyMountainSaint and jeanpierre like this.

04-28-2017, 10:17 AM	#4
K Major Site Donor 2019 Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: Bedford, TX Posts: 24,738 Blog Entries: 3	Re: Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32 Who you got at #42 JP? Bowser? Willis? Tim Williams?

04-28-2017, 10:40 AM	#7
\|Mitch\| 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Alexandria, La Posts: 11,303	Re: Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32 Armstead\|Peat\|Unger\|Warford\|Ramcyzk/Strief On paper looks to be a solid line K Major likes this.

04-28-2017, 10:43 AM	#8
frydaddy 1000 Posts + Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: Lafayette Posts: 1,952 Blog Entries: 1	Re: Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32 Best OT in a weak draft for O-linemen. That's inspiring. Rugby Saint II likes this.

04-28-2017, 10:56 AM	#9
Ashley Site Donor Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Colorado Springs Co Posts: 2,760	Re: Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32 Again I like the pick, but if from what I hear from the expert analyst that have repeatedly said he will be a back up. I'm hoping get he starts straight up. All I am saying is I would rather have Defense. 11 DE, 32 lb, or corner. And if he can get a sack somehow or cause turnovers. I'll do back flips with my Ole ass

04-28-2017, 11:00 AM	#10
\|Mitch\| 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Alexandria, La Posts: 11,303	Re: Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32 "He's a technician even though he's only a one-year starter at Wisconsin. He's a day-one starter on the right side. They pair him with Terron Armstead. Drew Brees is a happy guy." -- Mike Mayock ... AsylumGuido and K Major like this.

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/82567-despite-defensive-needs-saints-pick-offensive-tackle-no-32-a.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32	This thread	Refback	04-28-2017 08:03 AM	3