Register All Albums FAQ Community Experience
Go Back   New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints

Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Armstead|Peat|Unger|Warford|Ramcyzk/Strief On paper looks to be a solid line...

Like Tree53Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-28-2017, 11:40 AM   #31
Threaded by |Mitch|
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Alexandria, La
Posts: 11,303

Show Printable Version Email this Page
Rating: (0 votes - average)

Armstead|Peat|Unger|Warford|Ramcyzk/Strief

On paper looks to be a solid line
K Major likes this.
Views: 7788
Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2017, 11:42 AM   #32
Site Donor
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Bayou Bayfield CO
Posts: 4,722
Re: Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32

Originally Posted by Papa Voodoo View Post
Warford, Ramczyk, AP. Kept Kuhn. We're going to be running plenty this year. Armstead-Peat-Unger-Warford-Streif is as much BEEF as we've had since Nicks left.
I was wondering about that last night. Is Sean considering keeping it on the ground more? All he would need to do is figure out the other side of the ball. A strong ground game needs a strong D.

A strong run game with nuclear strike capabilities would be awesome!

Championship!
|Mitch| likes this.
Seer1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2017, 11:43 AM   #33
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Lafayette
Posts: 1,950
Blog Entries: 1
Re: Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32

Best OT in a weak draft for O-linemen. That's inspiring.
Rugby Saint II likes this.
frydaddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2017, 11:56 AM   #34
Site Donor
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Colorado Springs Co
Posts: 2,760
Re: Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32

Again I like the pick, but if from what I hear from the expert analyst that have repeatedly said he will be a back up. I'm hoping get he starts straight up.
All I am saying is I would rather have Defense. 11 DE, 32 lb, or corner.
And if he can get a sack somehow or cause turnovers. I'll do back flips with my Ole ass
Ashley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2017, 11:59 AM   #35
Hou Saints Fan
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 5,050
Re: Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32

I love the OT pick, for years I've wanted a midwest country strong lineman. Looks like we got one, hopefully Payton is cured of his pass happyitis and they start to pound the ball all day on the ground with passes mixed in
RaginCajun83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2017, 12:00 PM   #36
10000 POST CLUB
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Alexandria, La
Posts: 11,303
Re: Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32

"He's a technician even though he's only a one-year starter at Wisconsin. He's a day-one starter on the right side. They pair him with Terron Armstead. Drew Brees is a happy guy." -- Mike Mayock
...
AsylumGuido and K Major like this.
|Mitch| is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2017, 12:07 PM   #37
10000 POST CLUB
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bossier City, LA
Posts: 26,220
Re: Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32

Originally Posted by ScottF View Post
Maybe he'd be there 10 picks later at 42, maybe not. Maybe he is an upgrade over Strief...

All I know if we could have jumped the Niners at 31 and gotten Foster, a second starter on defense for probably a 7th this year or next. Pissed.
And what would have cost to jump the Niners for Foster? It would have taken two picks, at least, including a third this season. Not worth it. There's too much talent left out there and Ramczyk was a bargain, and a need, at that spot.
AsylumGuido is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2017, 12:21 PM   #38
10000 POST CLUB
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Alexandria, La
Posts: 11,303
Re: Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32

Round 1, Pick 32 (No. 32) (From New England)

Ryan Ramczyk, OT, Wisconsin:
An interesting conclusion to a wild night. This is the pick that the Saints acquired for trading Brandin Cooks to New England, but there weren’t many (any?) folks predicting they’d use it on a tackle. That’s not to say it is a nonsensical selection. Andrus Peat, the Saints’ 2015 first-rounder, has settled in at guard, and veteran Zach Strief turns 34 in September. So, the Saints got a jump on any potential future headaches by bringing in Ramczyk. The knock: It probably does not make New Orleans any better in 2017 unless Strief is headed out the door early. The defense could have used another body here.​ GRADE: B
...
|Mitch| is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2017, 12:37 PM   #39
Site Donor 2015
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Watford England
Posts: 8,803
Blog Entries: 1
Re: Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32

Podcast i just listened too
We are loosers last night

Didnt fix the D and we had Malholmes and Foster stolen

Foster i can believe not Malholmes
lee909 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2017, 12:49 PM   #40
Site Donor 2019
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Bedford, TX
Posts: 24,619
Blog Entries: 3
Re: Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32

Originally Posted by lee909 View Post
Podcast i just listened too
We are loosers last night

Didnt fix the D and we had Malholmes and Foster stolen

Foster i can believe not Malholmes
FWIW, there is a "unconfirmed report" coming out now that Reuben Foster will require a second surgery on his shoulder. Possibly another reason why he slid so far down the draft board last night.
K Major is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/82567-despite-defensive-needs-saints-pick-offensive-tackle-no-32-a.html
Posted By For Type Date Hits
Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32 This thread Refback 04-28-2017 09:03 AM 3


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:55 AM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts