Register All Albums FAQ Community Experience
Go Back   New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints

Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; As i said rather have had a DE but it really does as some great depth on the line LT Armstead-Peat LG Peat-Kelemete C- Unger - Allen RG Warford-Kelemete - Turner RT Strief - Ramczyk That is some quality depth ...

Like Tree53Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-28-2017, 08:33 AM   #11
Threaded by lee909
Site Donor 2015
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Watford England
Posts: 8,793

Blog Entries: 1
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Rating: (0 votes - average)

As i said rather have had a DE but it really does as some great depth on the line

LT Armstead-Peat
LG Peat-Kelemete
C- Unger - Allen
RG Warford-Kelemete - Turner
RT Strief - Ramczyk


That is some quality depth on paper
Views: 7776
Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2017, 08:42 AM   #12
Hu Dat!
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 6,673
Blog Entries: 13
Re: Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32

I really liked the pick. Now we are 3-deep at OT so we can finally hopefully keep Peat at LG and let him settle in. We are no longer 1 injury away from Peat moving all over the line.

And here's the thing - we need a pass rusher, but we don't need a Bruce Smith-type (although that would be nice). We need a speedy type like Danielle Hunter from the Vikings or the KGB that used to play for the Packers. Someone that we can rotate in on obvious passing downs that can wreck the protection. We can hopefully find that guy later in the draft and coach him up, or possibly use Kikaha in that role.
neugey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2017, 08:44 AM   #13
Site Donor
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Colorado Springs Co
Posts: 2,760
Re: Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32

Originally Posted by ChrisXVI View Post
Man, a lot of people don't get that the draft is about the future. If you draft straight up for need you're probably a terrible franchise.
We all get you pick to build and for the future. However if you a coach and your 7-9 three years in a row. Having a qb is in only a two - three span, at best. You pick where you need by far the most help. Which is defense
Offense top 5 for how many years in a row.
Defense , bottom half for how many years in a row.
Let me say I do like the pick, please get starters for now. I hope he beats out Street, then I'm happy
ScottF likes this.
Ashley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2017, 08:44 AM   #14
10000 POST CLUB
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Alexandria, La
Posts: 11,303
Re: Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32

I like how some are chicken littling like the draft is over; even though it was only the first round...

Acting like 1st round talent is the only ones good enough to play...
|Mitch| is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2017, 08:51 AM   #15
10000 POST CLUB
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 10,806
Blog Entries: 3
Re: Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32

What if Armstead moves to RT and Ramathorn is our new LT?







saintsfan1976 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2017, 08:57 AM   #16
10000 POST CLUB
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Alexandria, La
Posts: 11,303
Re: Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32

Originally Posted by saintsfan1976 View Post
What if Armstead moves to RT and Ramathorn is our new LT?
Isn't Ramczyk a natural RT, with one year at LT? From what I understand he is very versatile... I still think he comes in and takes Striefs job from day 1
|Mitch| is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2017, 09:00 AM   #17
LB Mentallity
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 15,870
Blog Entries: 68
Re: Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32

Ramczyk is a bit hard to peg because he is raw.

athletic enough to be a LT

athletic enough to be a very good RT is a safer bet
hagan714 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2017, 09:07 AM   #18
Site Donor 2019
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Bedford, TX
Posts: 24,589
Blog Entries: 3
Re: Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32

Originally Posted by Ashley View Post
However if you a coach and your 7-9 three years in a row. Having a qb is in only a two - three span, at best. You pick where you need by far the most help. Which is defense
Offense top 5 for how many years in a row.
Defense , bottom half for how many years in a row.
Lattimore was projected # 5-7 in most drafts. Ramczyk was projected 15-25.
Both are needs and BPA who fell way lower than most expected. There was a run on Def. Solid draft selections to me.
K Major is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2017, 09:08 AM   #19
Truth Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,713
Re: Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32

He was the #1 OT in the draft, and the 16th best overall prospect in the draft. We nabbed him at 32.

I'm just fine with that.
jnormand and Rugby Saint II like this.
Danno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2017, 09:23 AM   #20
10000 POST CLUB
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Alexandria, La
Posts: 11,303
Re: Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32

|Mitch| is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/82567-despite-defensive-needs-saints-pick-offensive-tackle-no-32-a.html
Posted By For Type Date Hits
Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32 This thread Refback 04-28-2017 08:03 AM 3


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:14 PM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts