Chase Daniel...

Tobias-Reiper · 08-24-2017, 06:52 PM

Originally Posted by spkb25

OMG YES...EVERYONE WAS HURT. That was how we lost to Seattle who went into the playoffs with 7 wins

Not really. The score was 36-41. Saints lost because they couldn't stop the Hawks.

spkb25 · 08-24-2017, 07:17 PM

Originally Posted by Tobias-Reiper

Not really. The score was 36-41. Saints lost because they couldn't stop the Hawks.

We lost because we were one dimensional and couldn't run the ball. We out gained the Seahawks in total yards and had more first downs. We couldn't run the ball at all. We led early in that game, and I remember Julius jones inside the 10 maybe inside the 5 yard line fumbling the ball.

Lynch did put a beating on us that day but we still out gained them in total yards, first downs, time of possession.. Bush got hurt early in that game and the only running back we had left was Julius Jones. Pretty sure we drafted Ingram and signed Sproles after that season because of it

Seer1 · 08-24-2017, 08:51 PM

Originally Posted by spkb25

We lost because we were one dimensional and couldn't run the ball. We out gained the Seahawks in total yards and had more first downs. We couldn't run the ball at all. We led early in that game, and I remember Julius jones inside the 10 maybe inside the 5 yard line fumbling the ball.

Lynch did put a beating on us that day but we still out gained them in total yards, first downs, time of possession.. Bush got hurt early in that game and the only running back we had left was Julius Jones. Pretty sure we drafted Ingram and signed Sproles after that season because of it

Exactly! That season was more frustrating to me than the past 7-9ers. We couldn't find a RB who would last a game much less the season. By the end I think we were putting in former players from old age homes around the country and when we ran out of those, they were putting in busts of players someone was hijacking from the hall of fame.

spkb25 · 08-25-2017, 07:10 AM

Originally Posted by Seer1

Exactly! That season was more frustrating to me than the past 7-9ers. We couldn't find a RB who would last a game much less the season. By the end I think we were putting in former players from old age homes around the country and when we ran out of those, they were putting in busts of players someone was hijacking from the hall of fame.

Very frustrating

Tobias-Reiper · 08-25-2017, 01:15 AM

Originally Posted by spkb25

We lost because we were one dimensional and couldn't run the ball.

I don't know about that. One dimensional or not, the Saints scored 36 points, and lost by 5.

Seer1 · 08-25-2017, 06:22 AM

Originally Posted by Tobias-Reiper

I don't know about that. One dimensional or not, the Saints scored 36 points, and lost by 5.

If we'd have had a running attack, we wouldn't have even needed to be playing in that game...

spkb25 · 08-25-2017, 07:07 AM

Originally Posted by Tobias-Reiper

I don't know about that. One dimensional or not, the Saints scored 36 points, and lost by 5.

It is a fair point, but after being up early 17-7 we started getting our butts kicked and scored a few td's late if I remember correctly. But your point is true that 36 should be enough to win. I just know that there is situational football and sometimes that is extremely important.

That said the d let you too many points and explosive plays. True

burningmetal · 08-24-2017, 09:23 PM

.

08-24-2017, 06:52 PM	#1
Tobias-Reiper Merces Letifer Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 4,161	Re: Chase Daniel... Originally Posted by spkb25 OMG YES...EVERYONE WAS HURT. That was how we lost to Seattle who went into the playoffs with 7 wins Not really. The score was 36-41. Saints lost because they couldn't stop the Hawks.

08-24-2017, 07:17 PM	#2
spkb25 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Baltimore, MD Posts: 13,144	Re: Chase Daniel... Originally Posted by Tobias-Reiper Not really. The score was 36-41. Saints lost because they couldn't stop the Hawks. We lost because we were one dimensional and couldn't run the ball. We out gained the Seahawks in total yards and had more first downs. We couldn't run the ball at all. We led early in that game, and I remember Julius jones inside the 10 maybe inside the 5 yard line fumbling the ball. Lynch did put a beating on us that day but we still out gained them in total yards, first downs, time of possession.. Bush got hurt early in that game and the only running back we had left was Julius Jones. Pretty sure we drafted Ingram and signed Sproles after that season because of it
	Your team stinks

08-24-2017, 08:51 PM	#3
Seer1 Site Donor Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Bayou Bayfield CO Posts: 4,722	Re: Chase Daniel... Originally Posted by spkb25 We lost because we were one dimensional and couldn't run the ball. We out gained the Seahawks in total yards and had more first downs. We couldn't run the ball at all. We led early in that game, and I remember Julius jones inside the 10 maybe inside the 5 yard line fumbling the ball. Lynch did put a beating on us that day but we still out gained them in total yards, first downs, time of possession.. Bush got hurt early in that game and the only running back we had left was Julius Jones. Pretty sure we drafted Ingram and signed Sproles after that season because of it Exactly! That season was more frustrating to me than the past 7-9ers. We couldn't find a RB who would last a game much less the season. By the end I think we were putting in former players from old age homes around the country and when we ran out of those, they were putting in busts of players someone was hijacking from the hall of fame.

08-25-2017, 07:10 AM	#4
spkb25 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Baltimore, MD Posts: 13,144	Re: Chase Daniel... Originally Posted by Seer1 Exactly! That season was more frustrating to me than the past 7-9ers. We couldn't find a RB who would last a game much less the season. By the end I think we were putting in former players from old age homes around the country and when we ran out of those, they were putting in busts of players someone was hijacking from the hall of fame. Very frustrating

08-25-2017, 01:15 AM	#5
Tobias-Reiper Merces Letifer Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 4,161	Re: Chase Daniel... Originally Posted by spkb25 We lost because we were one dimensional and couldn't run the ball. I don't know about that. One dimensional or not, the Saints scored 36 points, and lost by 5.

08-25-2017, 06:22 AM	#6
Seer1 Site Donor Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Bayou Bayfield CO Posts: 4,722	Re: Chase Daniel... Originally Posted by Tobias-Reiper I don't know about that. One dimensional or not, the Saints scored 36 points, and lost by 5. If we'd have had a running attack, we wouldn't have even needed to be playing in that game...

08-25-2017, 07:07 AM	#7
spkb25 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Baltimore, MD Posts: 13,144	Re: Chase Daniel... Originally Posted by Tobias-Reiper I don't know about that. One dimensional or not, the Saints scored 36 points, and lost by 5. It is a fair point, but after being up early 17-7 we started getting our butts kicked and scored a few td's late if I remember correctly. But your point is true that 36 should be enough to win. I just know that there is situational football and sometimes that is extremely important. That said the d let you too many points and explosive plays. True

08-24-2017, 09:23 PM	#8
burningmetal 1000 Posts + Join Date: Mar 2012 Posts: 3,923 Blog Entries: 3	Re: Chase Daniel... .
	Last edited by burningmetal; 08-24-2017 at 09:31 PM.. Reason: Double post

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/83937-chase-daniel.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
The Latest New Orleans Saints News \| SportSpyder	This thread	Refback	08-21-2017 07:31 PM	9
Chase Daniel...	This thread	Refback	08-21-2017 06:46 PM	1