Register All Albums FAQ Community Experience
Go Back   New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints

Precedents for the Legend of Klint Kubiak

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by AsylumGuido I never said that Allen had anything to do with acquiring the Saints defensive talent. As for Demario and Mathieu, both are coming off banner years and I see no reason why they suddenly hit some ...

Like Tree53Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-04-2024, 07:26 PM   #1
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 2,385
Re: Precedents for the Legend of Klint Kubiak

Originally Posted by AsylumGuido View Post
I never said that Allen had anything to do with acquiring the Saints defensive talent.

As for Demario and Mathieu, both are coming off banner years and I see no reason why they suddenly hit some imagined wall that you seem to wish exists to tarnish anything that has to do with your hated Loomis. Hopefully both Jordan and Lattimore rebound from injuries.
What is imagined is your world view where I am the only one sports fan in the world who thinks aging into the mid 30's and 40's is a risk of declined athletic performance. In the real world we actually live in the vast majority of sports fans agree that decline with aging becomes an increasing risk for athletes from age 30 to 40+. Some sports fans always feel their favorite players on their team still have a couple years in the tank before the decline hits, but we all know its coming. And in reality, we all know that aging can hit suddenly too. Mike Tyson was the invincible until he couldn't beat Buster Douglas. Peyton Manning was the biggest name in the NFL until Brock Osweiler took his job. Cameron Jordan went from averaging about 10 sacks a year against the like of Tom Brady and Matt Ryan to managing only 2 sacks against perhaps the weakest slate of offensive matchups ever faced by a defense. But oh thats right, in hindsight the Saints later revealed Jordan had a twisted ankle and will be 100% again next year. The thing is, Mike Tyson never recovered from his twisted ankle. Peyton Manning never recovered from his twisted ankle. Because sometimes when you are older, that twisted ankle is actually father time, and when it heals, father time takes the form of a worse injury or a lost step too many. Thats just reality. Age is no friend of athletic performance.

If you look at the stats below, Davis is the oldest active linebacker in the NFL. Why might I expect that he COULD decline or soon retire. Because every single other linebacker in the entire NFL even a day older than him already has. But I guess I am 'imagining' the site pro football reference.

https://www.pro-football-reference.c...ay=1&year=1990

I believe even Loomis has joked in interviews that Davis doesn't think he is getting older but he is and the team realized that. We can all hope Davis has another great year but I think realistically every sober minded person realizes he could easily decline this year, and the Saints are paying about half price for his skills knowing its basically a coin flip. Demario Davis has played at a similar level to Fred Warner and Roquan Smith, yet they make $18-20 million a year and Davis just signed for $17 million for two years. I don't think he or his agent are in the charity business, I think everyone understands there is a strong chance that when you pay for 2 years for the price of 1 on a player that age, you are building a significant probability of decline into the contract. One was you look at it is if you get 2 years for the price of one, you could get lucky and the Davis could continue to play at the same level and you double your money, but also there could be a 1/3 chance of extreme decline by 2024 and a 2/3 chance of extreme decline by 2025 so you get 2/3 value in 2024 and 1/3 value in 2025 and thats why you are getting 2 years for the price of 1.
Sinner likes this.

Last edited by BakoSaint; 06-04-2024 at 07:42 PM..
BakoSaint is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2024, 09:07 PM   #2
10000 POST CLUB
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bossier City, LA
Posts: 26,622
Re: Precedents for the Legend of Klint Kubiak

Originally Posted by BakoSaint View Post
What is imagined is your world view where I am the only one sports fan in the world who thinks aging into the mid 30's and 40's is a risk of declined athletic performance. In the real world we actually live in the vast majority of sports fans agree that decline with aging becomes an increasing risk for athletes from age 30 to 40+. Some sports fans always feel their favorite players on their team still have a couple years in the tank before the decline hits, but we all know its coming. And in reality, we all know that aging can hit suddenly too. Mike Tyson was the invincible until he couldn't beat Buster Douglas. Peyton Manning was the biggest name in the NFL until Brock Osweiler took his job. Cameron Jordan went from averaging about 10 sacks a year against the like of Tom Brady and Matt Ryan to managing only 2 sacks against perhaps the weakest slate of offensive matchups ever faced by a defense. But oh thats right, in hindsight the Saints later revealed Jordan had a twisted ankle and will be 100% again next year. The thing is, Mike Tyson never recovered from his twisted ankle. Peyton Manning never recovered from his twisted ankle. Because sometimes when you are older, that twisted ankle is actually father time, and when it heals, father time takes the form of a worse injury or a lost step too many. Thats just reality. Age is no friend of athletic performance.

If you look at the stats below, Davis is the oldest active linebacker in the NFL. Why might I expect that he COULD decline or soon retire. Because every single other linebacker in the entire NFL even a day older than him already has. But I guess I am 'imagining' the site pro football reference.

https://www.pro-football-reference.c...ay=1&year=1990

I believe even Loomis has joked in interviews that Davis doesn't think he is getting older but he is and the team realized that. We can all hope Davis has another great year but I think realistically every sober minded person realizes he could easily decline this year, and the Saints are paying about half price for his skills knowing its basically a coin flip. Demario Davis has played at a similar level to Fred Warner and Roquan Smith, yet they make $18-20 million a year and Davis just signed for $17 million for two years. I don't think he or his agent are in the charity business, I think everyone understands there is a strong chance that when you pay for 2 years for the price of 1 on a player that age, you are building a significant probability of decline into the contract. One was you look at it is if you get 2 years for the price of one, you could get lucky and the Davis could continue to play at the same level and you double your money, but also there could be a 1/3 chance of extreme decline by 2024 and a 2/3 chance of extreme decline by 2025 so you get 2/3 value in 2024 and 1/3 value in 2025 and thats why you are getting 2 years for the price of 1.
Age clearly affects different people in different ways. Tom Brady had many of his best statistical years and kept winning championships. Demario Davis isn't every other 30 something. He's incredible.

Of course, I didn't read any of that **** when you went into boxing crap. Not sure who would.

MatthewT likes this.
AsylumGuido is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:38 AM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts