Savings if cut or traded

brees84 · 12-23-2014, 08:18 PM

Originally Posted by halloween 65

I think Evans may be done.

You would cut the guy who just made it to the pro bowl? lol

sarcasm

blackangold · 12-23-2014, 08:50 PM

Originally Posted by brees84

You would cut the guy who just made it to the pro bowl? lol

I saw Evans get beat too often for him to go to the pro-bowl. It feels like a charity type of selection to be honest.

voodooido · 12-23-2014, 10:09 PM

Originally Posted by Jack Vegas

IMO the big cuts are Hawthorne, Bunkley and Evans. That, combined with a Brees restructure, gets you in the black easily, and let's be honest those players won't be missed that much.

I hate to say that about Evans, I really do. But he is about 1/3rd the player he was when he was good.

Loomis will manage the cap masterfully as he always does.

I believe you are way off. Bunkley trade or release would only save us 2.8 million. No way we sign someone equal to him for under 2.8. Hawthorne we would only save 2.9 million. Again, who would be out there we could grab for that price? One we could do without is Evans. We would save 6 million and easily sign a replacement equal to him for under 4 million.

Jack Vegas · 12-23-2014, 10:19 PM

Originally Posted by voodooido

I believe you are way off. Bunkley trade or release would only save us 2.8 million. No way we sign someone equal to him for under 2.8.

Bunkley wasn't that good this year before he got hurt, and we did great without him for a huge chunk of last year. Veteran nose tackles are a dime a dozen. We don't need him.

Originally Posted by voodooido

Hawthorne we would only save 2.9 million. Again, who would be out there we could grab for that price?

We don't have to. Humber is better than Hawthorne and he's already on the roster.

voodooido · 12-23-2014, 10:25 PM

Originally Posted by Jack Vegas

Bunkley wasn't that good this year before he got hurt, and we did great without him for a huge chunk of last year. Veteran nose tackles are a dime a dozen. We don't need him.

We don't have to. Humber is better than Hawthorne and he's already on the roster.

Humbar had 29 tackles, no sacks and no ints, played in 15 games
Hawthorne had 47 tackles, 3 sacks and 1 int, played in 11 games

Jack Vegas · 12-23-2014, 10:30 PM

Originally Posted by voodooido

Humbar had 29 tackles, no sacks and no ints, played in 15 games
Hawthorne had 47 tackles, 3 sacks and 1 int, played in 11 games

Curtis Lofton is 5th in the NFL in tackles. Do you think that makes him the NFL's 5th-best defensive player?

Stats don't tell the whole story. I use my eyes. My eyes tell me that Humber is younger, faster, better in pass coverage and doesn't overpursue against the run all the time.

And all of Hawthorne's sacks came in one game against Jay Cutler. He is hot garbage. We would've been better off re-signing Will Herring to play that spot all year.

blackangold · 12-23-2014, 11:04 PM

Originally Posted by voodooido

Humbar had 29 tackles, no sacks and no ints, played in 15 games
Hawthorne had 47 tackles, 3 sacks and 1 int, played in 11 games

The fact that Hawthorne only had 47 tackles and played 90% of the snaps says it all.

Stats tell a lot of lies. Ill never agree that we should keep Hawthorne or Bunk and PFF a stat site would agree with me.

Mr.Riaton · 12-23-2014, 05:26 PM

A savings of 13mil. between Evans and Jordan.....see ya! I hate to see Jordan go, but its a small price to pay for what we get in return. Combine that with a restructuring of Brees and we can build a hell of an O line...theoretically speaking.

NOLA54 · 12-23-2014, 05:55 PM

I'm sure Loomis will get it right.

Danno · 12-23-2014, 05:58 PM

Originally Posted by NOLA54

I'm sure Loomis will get it right.

Yep, its a shell game and he's one of the best at it. Most of these high cap guys will be restructured. We aren't giving them more money, we're just giving it to them as guaranteed money instead of salary.

12-23-2014, 08:18 PM	#1
brees84 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jan 2014 Posts: 3,015	Re: Savings if cut or traded Originally Posted by halloween 65 I think Evans may be done. You would cut the guy who just made it to the pro bowl? lol sarcasm
brees84 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jan 2014 Posts: 3,015

12-23-2014, 08:50 PM	#2
blackangold 1000 Posts + Join Date: Aug 2011 Posts: 3,422	Re: Savings if cut or traded Originally Posted by brees84 You would cut the guy who just made it to the pro bowl? lol I saw Evans get beat too often for him to go to the pro-bowl. It feels like a charity type of selection to be honest. SaintsBro and brees84 like this.

12-23-2014, 10:09 PM	#3
voodooido 1000 Posts + Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 2,840	Re: Savings if cut or traded Originally Posted by Jack Vegas IMO the big cuts are Hawthorne, Bunkley and Evans. That, combined with a Brees restructure, gets you in the black easily, and let's be honest those players won't be missed that much. I hate to say that about Evans, I really do. But he is about 1/3rd the player he was when he was good. Loomis will manage the cap masterfully as he always does. I believe you are way off. Bunkley trade or release would only save us 2.8 million. No way we sign someone equal to him for under 2.8. Hawthorne we would only save 2.9 million. Again, who would be out there we could grab for that price? One we could do without is Evans. We would save 6 million and easily sign a replacement equal to him for under 4 million.
voodooido 1000 Posts + Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 2,840

12-23-2014, 10:19 PM	#4
Jack Vegas 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 2,254	Re: Savings if cut or traded Originally Posted by voodooido I believe you are way off. Bunkley trade or release would only save us 2.8 million. No way we sign someone equal to him for under 2.8. Bunkley wasn't that good this year before he got hurt, and we did great without him for a huge chunk of last year. Veteran nose tackles are a dime a dozen. We don't need him. Originally Posted by voodooido Hawthorne we would only save 2.9 million. Again, who would be out there we could grab for that price? We don't have to. Humber is better than Hawthorne and he's already on the roster.
Jack Vegas 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 2,254

12-23-2014, 10:25 PM	#5
voodooido 1000 Posts + Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 2,840	Re: Savings if cut or traded Originally Posted by Jack Vegas Bunkley wasn't that good this year before he got hurt, and we did great without him for a huge chunk of last year. Veteran nose tackles are a dime a dozen. We don't need him. We don't have to. Humber is better than Hawthorne and he's already on the roster. Humbar had 29 tackles, no sacks and no ints, played in 15 games Hawthorne had 47 tackles, 3 sacks and 1 int, played in 11 games
voodooido 1000 Posts + Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 2,840

12-23-2014, 10:30 PM	#6
Jack Vegas 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 2,254	Re: Savings if cut or traded Originally Posted by voodooido Humbar had 29 tackles, no sacks and no ints, played in 15 games Hawthorne had 47 tackles, 3 sacks and 1 int, played in 11 games Curtis Lofton is 5th in the NFL in tackles. Do you think that makes him the NFL's 5th-best defensive player? Stats don't tell the whole story. I use my eyes. My eyes tell me that Humber is younger, faster, better in pass coverage and doesn't overpursue against the run all the time. And all of Hawthorne's sacks came in one game against Jay Cutler. He is hot garbage. We would've been better off re-signing Will Herring to play that spot all year.
Jack Vegas 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 2,254

12-23-2014, 11:04 PM	#7
blackangold 1000 Posts + Join Date: Aug 2011 Posts: 3,422	Re: Savings if cut or traded Originally Posted by voodooido Humbar had 29 tackles, no sacks and no ints, played in 15 games Hawthorne had 47 tackles, 3 sacks and 1 int, played in 11 games The fact that Hawthorne only had 47 tackles and played 90% of the snaps says it all. Stats tell a lot of lies. Ill never agree that we should keep Hawthorne or Bunk and PFF a stat site would agree with me.

12-23-2014, 05:26 PM	#8
Mr.Riaton 1000 Posts + Join Date: Mar 2013 Location: Broussard,La. Posts: 1,308	Re: Savings if cut or traded A savings of 13mil. between Evans and Jordan.....see ya! I hate to see Jordan go, but its a small price to pay for what we get in return. Combine that with a restructuring of Brees and we can build a hell of an O line...theoretically speaking.

12-23-2014, 05:55 PM	#9
NOLA54 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 1,708 Blog Entries: 1	Re: Savings if cut or traded I'm sure Loomis will get it right.

12-23-2014, 05:58 PM	#10
Danno Truth Addict Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R) Posts: 24,757	Re: Savings if cut or traded Originally Posted by NOLA54 I'm sure Loomis will get it right. Yep, its a shell game and he's one of the best at it. Most of these high cap guys will be restructured. We aren't giving them more money, we're just giving it to them as guaranteed money instead of salary.

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/70285-savings-if-cut-traded.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
The Latest Ty Zimmerman News \| SportSpyder	This thread	Refback	01-01-2015 02:04 PM	3
The Latest Tim Lelito News \| SportSpyder	This thread	Refback	12-23-2014 06:25 PM	1
The Latest Keenan Lewis News \| SportSpyder	This thread	Refback	12-23-2014 05:33 PM	7
The Latest New Orleans Saints News \| SportSpyder	This thread	Refback	12-23-2014 05:09 PM	7
Savings if cut or traded	This thread	Refback	12-23-2014 04:49 PM	16