Savings if cut or traded

Jack Vegas · 12-23-2014, 10:41 PM

Originally Posted by voodooido

And getting twice the stats in less games than the guy you want to replace him.

One is a starter, the other one a rotational player. I would hope Hawthorne would get twice the stats when he is on the field 80% of the time as opposed to the other guy. That doesn't mean he's any good.

voodooido · 12-23-2014, 10:43 PM

Originally Posted by Jack Vegas

One is a starter, the other one a rotational player. I would hope Hawthorne would get twice the stats when he is on the field 80% of the time as opposed to the other guy. That doesn't mean he's any good.

Ill give you that but Humber started 5 games this season. No stats to show for those 5 games.

Jack Vegas · 12-23-2014, 10:54 PM

Originally Posted by voodooido

Ill give you that but Humber started 5 games this season. No stats to show for those 5 games.

According to NFL.com game logs, Humber started 5 games and had 19 tackles. As opposed to Hawthorne's 47 tackes in 11 starts.

That gives Hawthorne an average of 4.2 tackles per game and Humber an average of 3.8. Wow, so much difference - except one of these guys made 3.5 million this year and the other made 630K.

Since you like statistics so much, let's do a cost-benefit analysis.

Humber gets $21,724 for each tackle he makes

Hawthorne gets $74,469 for each tackle he makes....and is only marginally more productive.

You can figure it out for yourself from here, I am sure.

spkb25 · 12-24-2014, 10:28 AM

Originally Posted by Jack Vegas

According to NFL.com game logs, Humber started 5 games and had 19 tackles. As opposed to Hawthorne's 47 tackes in 11 starts.

That gives Hawthorne an average of 4.2 tackles per game and Humber an average of 3.8. Wow, so much difference - except one of these guys made 3.5 million this year and the other made 630K.

Since you like statistics so much, let's do a cost-benefit analysis.

Humber gets $21,724 for each tackle he makes

Hawthorne gets $74,469 for each tackle he makes....and is only marginally more productive.

You can figure it out for yourself from here, I am sure.

That's beyond sad, n both accounts, but for Hawthrone. Jesus christmas

Jack Vegas · 12-23-2014, 10:44 PM

Originally Posted by voodooido

And getting twice the stats in less games than the guy you want to replace him. I'll stick with the sacks, ints and tackles and you stick with.....well, what YOU see.

The only statistic that's relevant to Hawthorne anymore is how fast the Saints to cut his sorry unproductive butt when the offseason starts. He'll be one of the first to go, I promise you.

voodooido · 12-23-2014, 10:51 PM

Originally Posted by Jack Vegas

The only statistic that's relevant to Hawthorne anymore is how fast the Saints to cut his sorry unproductive butt when the offseason starts. He'll be one of the first to go, I promise you.

If they can find someone for under 2.8 million to replace him that's better I'll be right there with you. I just don't see it happening.

Sarik · 12-24-2014, 06:25 AM

Originally Posted by Jack Vegas

The only statistic that's relevant to Hawthorne anymore is how fast the Saints to cut his sorry unproductive butt when the offseason starts. He'll be one of the first to go, I promise you.

I sure do hope so! Draft multiple LB's to compete for that spot. Michigans Jake Ryan is someone who could play any LB spot & had somewhere in the 3-4 maybe 5th round range depending on how it plays out. Need help in a bad way.

spkb25 · 12-24-2014, 10:27 AM

Originally Posted by Jack Vegas

The only statistic that's relevant to Hawthorne anymore is how fast the Saints to cut his sorry unproductive butt when the offseason starts. He'll be one of the first to go, I promise you.

Don't know how he stays

voodooido · 12-23-2014, 10:47 PM

And one other stat you forgot to look up, Humber will be a FA and only 2 years younger than Hawthorne.

Jack Vegas · 12-23-2014, 11:04 PM

PS you seem to have omitted the fact that Humber did have one sack this year. Not zero, as you said earlier.

12-23-2014, 10:41 PM	#1
Jack Vegas 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 2,254	Re: Savings if cut or traded Originally Posted by voodooido And getting twice the stats in less games than the guy you want to replace him. One is a starter, the other one a rotational player. I would hope Hawthorne would get twice the stats when he is on the field 80% of the time as opposed to the other guy. That doesn't mean he's any good.
Jack Vegas 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 2,254

12-23-2014, 10:43 PM	#2
voodooido 1000 Posts + Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 2,819	Re: Savings if cut or traded Originally Posted by Jack Vegas One is a starter, the other one a rotational player. I would hope Hawthorne would get twice the stats when he is on the field 80% of the time as opposed to the other guy. That doesn't mean he's any good. Ill give you that but Humber started 5 games this season. No stats to show for those 5 games.
voodooido 1000 Posts + Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 2,819

12-23-2014, 10:54 PM	#3
Jack Vegas 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 2,254	Re: Savings if cut or traded Originally Posted by voodooido Ill give you that but Humber started 5 games this season. No stats to show for those 5 games. According to NFL.com game logs, Humber started 5 games and had 19 tackles. As opposed to Hawthorne's 47 tackes in 11 starts. That gives Hawthorne an average of 4.2 tackles per game and Humber an average of 3.8. Wow, so much difference - except one of these guys made 3.5 million this year and the other made 630K. Since you like statistics so much, let's do a cost-benefit analysis. Humber gets $21,724 for each tackle he makes Hawthorne gets $74,469 for each tackle he makes....and is only marginally more productive. You can figure it out for yourself from here, I am sure.
Jack Vegas 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 2,254

12-24-2014, 10:28 AM	#4
spkb25 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Baltimore, MD Posts: 13,115	Re: Savings if cut or traded Originally Posted by Jack Vegas According to NFL.com game logs, Humber started 5 games and had 19 tackles. As opposed to Hawthorne's 47 tackes in 11 starts. That gives Hawthorne an average of 4.2 tackles per game and Humber an average of 3.8. Wow, so much difference - except one of these guys made 3.5 million this year and the other made 630K. Since you like statistics so much, let's do a cost-benefit analysis. Humber gets $21,724 for each tackle he makes Hawthorne gets $74,469 for each tackle he makes....and is only marginally more productive. You can figure it out for yourself from here, I am sure. That's beyond sad, n both accounts, but for Hawthrone. Jesus christmas

12-23-2014, 10:44 PM	#5
Jack Vegas 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 2,254	Re: Savings if cut or traded Originally Posted by voodooido And getting twice the stats in less games than the guy you want to replace him. I'll stick with the sacks, ints and tackles and you stick with.....well, what YOU see. The only statistic that's relevant to Hawthorne anymore is how fast the Saints to cut his sorry unproductive butt when the offseason starts. He'll be one of the first to go, I promise you. Sarik and brees84 like this.
Jack Vegas 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 2,254

12-23-2014, 10:51 PM	#6
voodooido 1000 Posts + Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 2,819	Re: Savings if cut or traded Originally Posted by Jack Vegas The only statistic that's relevant to Hawthorne anymore is how fast the Saints to cut his sorry unproductive butt when the offseason starts. He'll be one of the first to go, I promise you. If they can find someone for under 2.8 million to replace him that's better I'll be right there with you. I just don't see it happening.
voodooido 1000 Posts + Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 2,819

12-24-2014, 06:25 AM	#7
Sarik 100th Post Join Date: May 2012 Location: San Antonio, Texas Posts: 292	Re: Savings if cut or traded Originally Posted by Jack Vegas The only statistic that's relevant to Hawthorne anymore is how fast the Saints to cut his sorry unproductive butt when the offseason starts. He'll be one of the first to go, I promise you. I sure do hope so! Draft multiple LB's to compete for that spot. Michigans Jake Ryan is someone who could play any LB spot & had somewhere in the 3-4 maybe 5th round range depending on how it plays out. Need help in a bad way.

12-24-2014, 10:27 AM	#8
spkb25 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Baltimore, MD Posts: 13,115	Re: Savings if cut or traded Originally Posted by Jack Vegas The only statistic that's relevant to Hawthorne anymore is how fast the Saints to cut his sorry unproductive butt when the offseason starts. He'll be one of the first to go, I promise you. Don't know how he stays

12-23-2014, 10:47 PM	#9
voodooido 1000 Posts + Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 2,819	Re: Savings if cut or traded And one other stat you forgot to look up, Humber will be a FA and only 2 years younger than Hawthorne.
voodooido 1000 Posts + Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 2,819

12-23-2014, 11:04 PM	#10
Jack Vegas 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 2,254	Re: Savings if cut or traded PS you seem to have omitted the fact that Humber did have one sack this year. Not zero, as you said earlier.
Jack Vegas 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 2,254

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/70285-savings-if-cut-traded.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
The Latest Ty Zimmerman News \| SportSpyder	This thread	Refback	01-01-2015 02:04 PM	3
The Latest Tim Lelito News \| SportSpyder	This thread	Refback	12-23-2014 06:25 PM	1
The Latest Keenan Lewis News \| SportSpyder	This thread	Refback	12-23-2014 05:33 PM	7
The Latest New Orleans Saints News \| SportSpyder	This thread	Refback	12-23-2014 05:09 PM	7
Savings if cut or traded	This thread	Refback	12-23-2014 04:49 PM	16