|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by ScottF Maybe he'd be there 10 picks later at 42, maybe not. Maybe he is an upgrade over Strief... All I know if we could have jumped the Niners at 31 and gotten Foster, a second starter ...
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#10 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bossier City, LA
Posts: 26,953
|
Re: Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32
And what would have cost to jump the Niners for Foster? It would have taken two picks, at least, including a third this season. Not worth it. There's too much talent left out there and Ramczyk was a bargain, and a need, at that spot.
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/82567-despite-defensive-needs-saints-pick-offensive-tackle-no-32-a.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32 | This thread | Refback | 04-28-2017 08:03 AM | 3 |