|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by AsylumGuido And what would have cost to jump the Niners for Foster? It would have taken two picks, at least, including a third this season. Not worth it. There's too much talent left out there and Ramczyk ...
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#11 |
Site Donor 2018
|
Re: Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32
Originally Posted by AsylumGuido
And there's also the bargain-basement deal we have in Klein and Robertson and possibly Te'o if he's recovered...![]()
We have no depth behind the ageless wonder Zach Strief... We have three (3) offensive tackles on the roster and one of them, Peat, is the starting LG, Armstead has had a propensity to injury in his young career, and then there's a 33 yo right tackle... Look at our offensive line now, with that one selection... SAINTS OFFENSIVE LINE DEPTH CHART - 2017 NFL Draft ![]() LT (2) 72 - Terron Armstead, 65 - Ryan Ramcyzk (R1, P32) LG (2) 75 - Andrus Peat, 73 - John Fullington, 78 - Landon Turner C (2) 60 - Max Unger, 66 - Jack Allen RG (2) 67 - Larry Warford, 65 - Senio Kelemete RT (2) 64 - Zach Strief, 65 - Ryan Ramcyzk (R1, P32) Now, Peat can prepare all week at LG and not have to go through all the last minute adjustments he had last season... And I'm not sold on Warford, that's why I really wanted to spend the wee little bit extra and secure Kevin Zeitler... Now we may still have to seriously consider Dan Feeney in the second round... |
It's not that my way is the right way, I just make the right way my way...
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/82567-despite-defensive-needs-saints-pick-offensive-tackle-no-32-a.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32 | This thread | Refback | 04-28-2017 08:03 AM | 3 |