|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by Boston Saint Pardon me for jumping in go, but they simply are not the double edge sword you are making them out to be. As demonstrated before there have been multiple seasons for quarterbacks that made the ...
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#28 |
500th Post
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 576
|
Re: Taysom Hill: “Really nice” to tailor all offseason work to playing QB
Originally Posted by Boston Saint
Who is giving him a pass? If those QB’s were on the Saints rosters after having horrible seasons wrt interceptions, I would be making the EXACT same argument that I am now. Those QB’s are all retired though, their stats and careers are history..., aka the past. What we’re discussing is the future. And anybody who says I don’t trust Winston to not throw a crapton of int’s has a legitimate point.![]()
Winston could be the best thing in a Saints uni since crunchy peanut butter was introduced to the consumer market, lol. Entirely possible, entirely possible the opposite will happen. It’s not fair to compare already finished and completed careers to one that is in process. We, at least I, just don’t know the future. You know my arguments, lol, I’ve been very critical of Drew Brees this past year, and was called a “hater” many times, just for my criticism of his arm strength and ability to push the ball vertically. First ballot HOFer or not, the guy I want starting at QB is not the guy who says: “I can’t make that throw, I can’t make that throw, I know I can’t make that throw, I can’t make that throw..., What do I have left in my toolbox” I’m excited about the future, Hill, Winston..., or heck, maybe even Ian Book, or someone else! May the best player get the start, stay healthy, and lead the Saints to many championships!!! As far as Winston’s stats go? 88 int’s in 70 starts. That’s more than one int every game he’s started. Bad? That’s subjective. Me? I’m not ok with turning the ball over that much. You may evaluate turnovers differently though. |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|