Marcus Davenport

AsylumGuido · 01-22-2023, 04:46 PM

Originally Posted by SmashMouth

So you then agree we shoulda kept Hendrickson.

Sure, but you never know until later. San Diego thought they'd made the right decision at the time, too. Hindsight is always 20/20.

SmashMouth · 01-22-2023, 05:01 PM

Originally Posted by AsylumGuido

Sure, but you never know until later. San Diego thought they'd made the right decision at the time, too. Hindsight is always 20/20.

I am pretty sure no one felt that Hendrickson would not produce on the next contract, which he got at Cincy. It's more a matter of what the Saints thought they had in Davenport , the two number ones it took to get him,
and what they invested overall in P Turner and Davenport. If ones removes those two picks, which one could argue should not have been made , Hendrickson is so easily affordable . The very same decision exists Granderson. He's a rising star just like Hendrickson was. And the Saints need to keep him.

Now to really play 20/20, just who could the Saints have drafted in lieu of Davenport and Turner?

AsylumGuido · 01-22-2023, 05:05 PM

Originally Posted by SmashMouth

I am pretty sure no one felt that Hendrickson would not produce on the next contract, which he got at Cincy. It's more a matter of what the Saints thought they had in Davenport , the two number ones it took to get him,
and what they invested overall in P Turner and Davenport. If ones removes those two picks, which one could argue should not have been made , Hendrickson is so easily affordable . The very same decision exists Granderson. He's a rising star just like Hendrickson was. And the Saints need to keep him.

Now to really play 20/20, just who could the Saints have drafted in lieu of Davenport and Turner?

Yup. There's always could'a been. And also should not have's. You never know for sure.

dizzle88 · 01-22-2023, 05:13 PM

Originally Posted by SmashMouth

I am pretty sure no one felt that Hendrickson would not produce on the next contract, which he got at Cincy. It's more a matter of what the Saints thought they had in Davenport , the two number ones it took to get him,
and what they invested overall in P Turner and Davenport. If ones removes those two picks, which one could argue should not have been made , Hendrickson is so easily affordable . The very same decision exists Granderson. He's a rising star just like Hendrickson was. And the Saints need to keep him.

Now to really play 20/20, just who could the Saints have drafted in lieu of Davenport and Turner?

Lol here's some that stand out to me instead of Davenport, that were all taken after him.

Lamar Jackson, Leighton Vander-esch, DJ Moore, Fred Warner, Nick Chubb.

01-22-2023, 04:46 PM	#1
AsylumGuido 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Bossier City, LA Posts: 26,622	Re: Marcus Davenport Originally Posted by SmashMouth So you then agree we shoulda kept Hendrickson. Sure, but you never know until later. San Diego thought they'd made the right decision at the time, too. Hindsight is always 20/20.

01-22-2023, 05:01 PM	#2
SmashMouth I donated, did you? Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Mandeville, LA Posts: 38,797 Blog Entries: 29	Re: Marcus Davenport Originally Posted by AsylumGuido Sure, but you never know until later. San Diego thought they'd made the right decision at the time, too. Hindsight is always 20/20. I am pretty sure no one felt that Hendrickson would not produce on the next contract, which he got at Cincy. It's more a matter of what the Saints thought they had in Davenport , the two number ones it took to get him, and what they invested overall in P Turner and Davenport. If ones removes those two picks, which one could argue should not have been made , Hendrickson is so easily affordable . The very same decision exists Granderson. He's a rising star just like Hendrickson was. And the Saints need to keep him. Now to really play 20/20, just who could the Saints have drafted in lieu of Davenport and Turner? AsylumGuido and dizzle88 like this.

01-22-2023, 05:05 PM	#3
AsylumGuido 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Bossier City, LA Posts: 26,622	Re: Marcus Davenport Originally Posted by SmashMouth I am pretty sure no one felt that Hendrickson would not produce on the next contract, which he got at Cincy. It's more a matter of what the Saints thought they had in Davenport , the two number ones it took to get him, and what they invested overall in P Turner and Davenport. If ones removes those two picks, which one could argue should not have been made , Hendrickson is so easily affordable . The very same decision exists Granderson. He's a rising star just like Hendrickson was. And the Saints need to keep him. Now to really play 20/20, just who could the Saints have drafted in lieu of Davenport and Turner? Yup. There's always could'a been. And also should not have's. You never know for sure.

01-22-2023, 05:13 PM	#4
dizzle88 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 11,534	Re: Marcus Davenport Originally Posted by SmashMouth I am pretty sure no one felt that Hendrickson would not produce on the next contract, which he got at Cincy. It's more a matter of what the Saints thought they had in Davenport , the two number ones it took to get him, and what they invested overall in P Turner and Davenport. If ones removes those two picks, which one could argue should not have been made , Hendrickson is so easily affordable . The very same decision exists Granderson. He's a rising star just like Hendrickson was. And the Saints need to keep him. Now to really play 20/20, just who could the Saints have drafted in lieu of Davenport and Turner? Lol here's some that stand out to me instead of Davenport, that were all taken after him. Lamar Jackson, Leighton Vander-esch, DJ Moore, Fred Warner, Nick Chubb. SmashMouth and K Major like this.